💾 Archived View for gemini.bortzmeyer.org › rfc-mirror › rfc9121.txt captured on 2023-05-24 at 18:21:59.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) K. Davies
Request for Comments: 9121 A. Baber
Obsoletes: 1528 IANA
Updates: 1706 April 2023
Category: Informational
ISSN: 2070-1721
Deprecating Infrastructure "int" Domains
Abstract
This document deprecates the use of any "int" domain names that were
designated for infrastructure purposes by the IETF, and it identifies
them for removal from the "int" top-level domain. Any
implementations that involve these domains are now deprecated. This
document also changes the status of RFC 1528 and RFC 1706 to
Historic.
Status of This Memo
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for informational purposes.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents
approved by the IESG are candidates for any level of Internet
Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9121.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the
Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described
in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Historical Infrastructural Uses
2.1. atma.int
2.2. ip4.int
2.3. ip6.int
2.4. nsap.int
2.5. rdi.int
2.6. reg.int
2.7. tpc.int
3. Updates to Other RFC Series Documents
3.1. RFC 1528
3.2. RFC 1706
4. IANA Considerations
5. Security Considerations
6. Additional Information
7. Informative References
Acknowledgments
Authors' Addresses
1. Introduction
The "int" top-level domain [RFC1591] is a specialized domain
designated for intergovernmental organizations, which are
organizations established by international treaties between or among
national governments.
Historically, the "int" domain was also used for purposes related to
Internet infrastructure. This practice ended in 2001 when the "arpa"
domain was declared the appropriate home for infrastructural
identifier spaces [RFC3172]. In conjunction with this change, the
eligibility for "int" domains was limited to only intergovernmental
treaty organizations.
The documented uses of infrastructural identifiers in the "int"
domain were largely experimental and are now, in practice, obsolete.
This document changes the status of related specifications to
Historic, and it removes any associated delegations from the "int"
zone in the domain name system.
2. Historical Infrastructural Uses
The following domains were used for infrastructural identifier
purposes that are now considered historic. Although each of these
names was either delegated or documented at one time, the parties
administering them have long since stopped using them.
2.1. atma.int
The atma.int domain was experimentally defined to implement address
lookups for Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM), including ATM End
System Addresses (AESAs) [ANS].
2.2. ip4.int
The ip4.int domain was described as providing an alternative to the
in-addr.arpa domain for mapping host IPv4 addresses to host names.
The in-addr.arpa domain zone continues to be administered for this
purpose [RFC1035].
2.3. ip6.int
The ip6.int domain was originally delegated for mapping host IPv6
addresses to host names. It was subsequently removed from the "int"
zone, having been replaced by ip6.arpa [RFC4159].
2.4. nsap.int
The nsap.int domain name was specified to experimentally map Open
Systems Interconnection (OSI) Network Service Access Points to domain
names [RFC1706].
2.5. rdi.int
The rdi.int domain name experimentally mapped OSI Inter-Domain
Routing Protocol's Routing Domain Identifiers [ISO10747] to the
domain name system.
2.6. reg.int
The reg.int domain name hosted an experimental mechanism for
publishing IANA registration values in the domain name system.
2.7. tpc.int
The tpc.int domain name hosted an experimental remote printing
service that served as a gateway between Internet mail and facsimile
transmission [RFC1528].
3. Updates to Other RFC Series Documents
3.1. RFC 1528
The specification for tpc.int [RFC1528] is Historic, as it no longer
functions as described in the document.
3.2. RFC 1706
The specification for nsap.int [RFC1706] is Historic, as it no longer
functions as described in the document.
4. IANA Considerations
IANA has removed the historical "int" domains discussed in this
document.
5. Security Considerations
Some old systems might have one or more subdomains of these names
hardwired and expect a positive response for at least the second-
level domain. This is, of course, true for any name in the DNS and
should not be the sole basis for retaining obsolete names.
Existing applications should eliminate any reliance upon these zones.
The operator of the "int" domain should be cautious about any
potential re-use of these domains for intergovernmental treaty
organizations.
6. Additional Information
This document is the result of a comprehensive inventory of .int
domains to accurately establish and record their purpose based on
historical documentation. As part of this inventory, IANA studied
the domains delegated for purposes related to infrastructure
identifiers. Query patterns in the DNS for these domains were
analyzed and judged to be insignificant; preliminary outreach to the
contacts for the associated domains was conducted. The assessment
concluded that these domains are very likely obsolete. This document
formalizes that assessment.
There are a small number of nominal "int" domains for "international
databases" that are not defined by any standards documentation. They
are assigned to entities rather than for identifier purposes. Their
dispositions are beyond the scope of this memo.
7. Informative References
[ANS] The ATM Forum Technical Committee, "ATM Name System
Specification Version 1.0", ATM Forum af-saa-0069.000,
November 1996, <https://www.broadband-
forum.org/technical/download/af-saa-0069.000.pdf>.
[ISO10747] ISO/IEC, "Information technology - Telecommunications and
information exchange between systems - Protocol for
exchange of inter-domain routeing information among
intermediate systems to support forwarding of ISO 8473
PDUs", ISO/IEC 10747:1994, October 1994,
<https://www.iso.org/standard/21417.html>.
[RFC1035] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and
specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, DOI 10.17487/RFC1035,
November 1987, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1035>.
[RFC1528] Malamud, C. and M. Rose, "Principles of Operation for the
TPC.INT Subdomain: Remote Printing -- Technical
Procedures", RFC 1528, DOI 10.17487/RFC1528, October 1993,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1528>.
[RFC1591] Postel, J., "Domain Name System Structure and Delegation",
RFC 1591, DOI 10.17487/RFC1591, March 1994,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1591>.
[RFC1706] Manning, B. and R. Colella, "DNS NSAP Resource Records",
RFC 1706, DOI 10.17487/RFC1706, October 1994,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1706>.
[RFC3172] Huston, G., Ed., "Management Guidelines & Operational
Requirements for the Address and Routing Parameter Area
Domain ("arpa")", BCP 52, RFC 3172, DOI 10.17487/RFC3172,
September 2001, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3172>.
[RFC4159] Huston, G., "Deprecation of "ip6.int"", BCP 109, RFC 4159,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4159, August 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4159>.
Acknowledgments
This document was compiled with help from Ted Hardie and Michelle
Cotton, with additional input from Jari Arkko, John Klensin, Warren
Kumari, Pete Resnick, George Michaelson, and Toerless Eckert.
Authors' Addresses
Kim Davies
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
PTI/ICANN
12025 Waterfront Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90094
United States of America
Email: kim.davies@iana.org
Amanda Baber
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
PTI/ICANN
12025 Waterfront Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90094
United States of America
Email: amanda.baber@iana.org