💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › document › daniel-cairns-shifu-1884-1915 captured on 2023-05-24 at 19:47:31. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-03-20)

➡️ Next capture (2023-07-10)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Shifu (1884–1915)
Date: 2011
Source: *The International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest*, Edited by Immanuel Ness. DOI: 10.1002/9781405198073.wbierp1802
Authors: Daniel Cairns
Topics: biography, China, anarchist biography, Chinese Anarchism
Published: 2020-05-10 06:40:47Z

Shifu, a Chinese revolutionary, anarchist

organizer, and writer, was born Liu Shaobin

to a prosperous family in Guangdong. Classically educated as a child, he performed

exceptionally well in school but disliked his

formal education. In 1902, he traveled to

Japan to pursue western studies. There, he

discovered radical politics and joined Sun

Yat-Sen’s Revolutionary Alliance (RA). The

RA trained him in terrorism, teaching him

to construct and use explosives. He was

assigned important missions but never completed them; none of his targets was struck by

his bombs, and in fact, he was victim to two

of his own devices, the latter of which cost

him the lower half of his left arm in 1907.

Following that abortive attempt, aimed at a

Qing general in Guangzhou, he was jailed for

two years, escaping execution because of his

father’s connections.

While imprisoned, he searched for insights

in Buddhism, “national essence” scholarship, and the Paris-based anarchist journal,

1909, he traveled to Hong Kong to resume

RA activities. Eventually, he abandoned

reformism, changing his name from Liu Sifu

(a pseudonym connoting reforms) to simply

Shifu (“teaching renewal”). New Era, brought

to him by his brother, clarified his own ideas,

and by 1911 he was a declared anarchist, dissociating himself from terrorism. He moved

to Shanghai and founded the Society of the

Cock Crowing in the Dark the same year.

Shifu transmitted anarchist theory but was

not the originator of many original ideas.

Still, his particular amalgam of evolutionary

theory, moral principle, and autonomous revolutionary action was classified as its own distinct ideology, Shifuism. After the fall of the

Qing dynasty, revolutionaries in China sought

organizations offering systematic programs,

something anarchism was seen as lacking;

Shifu developed and espoused an appropriate,

if utopian, response to this. Following Tolstoy,

he wanted to rebuild society in the form of

sustainable, collective, agrarian communes.

In 1913, he founded the Commitment

Club, through which many non-industrial

workers were included in a labor union. The

same year, he famously debated Jiang Kanghu,

the leader of the Chinese Socialist Party, and

Sun Yat-Sen, the leader of the Guomindang

(Kuomintang), over the relative merits of

their socialisms. Because of his prominence

as an oppositional leader, the Yuan Shikai

government suppressed him, forcing him to

shift locations between Guangdong, Macao,

and Shanghai. In 1914, he wrote a report

on the Chinese anarchist movement for

the International Anarchist Congress. He

died the next year. After his death, his disciples formed other anarchist-inspired labor

organizations, like the workers’ Mutual Aid

Society of 1921, an umbrella organization for

over 40 smaller labor unions.

References and Suggested Readings

<biblio>

Chan, P. (1979) Liu Shifu (1884–1915): A Chinese Anarchist and the Radicalization of Chinese Thought. PhD thesis. Berkeley: University

of California Berkeley.

Krebs, E. (1998) Shifu, Soul of Chinese Anarchism.

Lanham, MD: Rowman, & Littlefield.

Shaw, H. A. (1915) Chinese Revolutionist. Mother

Earth 10, 8 (October): 284–5.

Shifu (Ed.) (1913) Huiming lu [Crying in the Dark

Weekly]. Guangzhou.

Shifu (Ed.) (1914) Min sheng [People’s Voice].

Macao (nos. 3, 4), Shanghai (nos. 5–22).

Shifu. (1927) Shifu wencun [Collected Works of

Shifu]. Guangdong: Gexin shuju.

Zarrow, P. (1990) Anarchism and Chinese Political

Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.

</biblio>

Home