💾 Archived View for midnight.pub › replies › 5277 captured on 2023-04-26 at 16:51:45. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hah - good analogy!
So I'm not in agreement that corps are the collective actions of the bad aspects of the many, but I think they're more the exaggerated bad actions of the few.
There's a Dawkins example here I can't quite think of right now, but it's something along the lines of there are two camps of people: Hawks and Doves. Hawks are abrasive, Doves hate confrontation.
Though I don't believe in such binary classifications of people, I do think everyone has Hawk or Dove like tendencies in certain situations, and ultimately that it just takes one single Hawk to dominate all the other Doves in a group. I genuinely believe this is how corps grow.
> So I'm not in agreement that corps > are the collective actions of the > bad aspects of the many, but I think > they're more the exaggerated bad > actions of the few.
Might the many be at least as culpable as the few for somehow letting a truly miniscule few have their way?
I like somewhat tidiness of the hawks/doves thing, but am hard pressed to think of there being many - if any - human doves not too far beyond the crib. To me it seems more like greater and lesser hawks - the latter rising to the beastly occasion when in the company of what they consider even lesser hawks, copping dove-hood when imagining doing so gives them an advantage ("a hawk in doves clothing"), whatever they imagine securing a bigger seed share.