💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 6314.gmi captured on 2023-06-14 at 14:46:41. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Intel on the outside - The rise of artificial intelligence is creating new

1970-01-01 02:00:00

rlp

The success of Nvidia and its new computing chip signals rapid change in IT

architecture

WE ALMOST went out of business several times. Usually founders don t talk

about their company s near-death experiences. But Jen-Hsun Huang, the boss of

Nvidia, has no reason to be coy. His firm, which develops microprocessors and

related software, is on a winning streak. In the past quarter its revenues

increased by 55%, reaching $2.2bn, and in the past 12 months its share price

has almost quadrupled.

A big part of Nvidia s success is because demand is growing quickly for its

chips, called graphics processing units (GPUs), which turn personal computers

into fast gaming devices. But the GPUs also have new destinations: notably data

centres where artificial-intelligence (AI) programmes gobble up the vast

quantities of computing power that they generate.

Soaring sales of these chips (see chart) are the clearest sign yet of a secular

shift in information technology. The architecture of computing is fragmenting

because of the slowing of Moore s law, which until recently guaranteed that the

power of computing would double roughly every two years, and because of the

rapid rise of cloud computing and AI. The implications for the semiconductor

industry and for Intel, its dominant company, are profound.

Things were straightforward when Moore s law, named after Gordon Moore, a

founder of Intel, was still in full swing. Whether in PCs or in servers

(souped-up computers in data centres), one kind of microprocessor, known as a

central processing unit (CPU), could deal with most workloads , as classes of

computing tasks are called. Because Intel made the most powerful CPUs, it came

to rule not only the market for PC processors (it has a market share of about

80%) but the one for servers, where it has an almost complete monopoly. In 2016

it had revenues of nearly $60bn.

This unipolar world is starting to crumble. Processors are no longer improving

quickly enough to be able to handle, for instance, machine learning and other

AI applications, which require huge amounts of data and hence consume more

number-crunching power than entire data centres did just a few years ago. Intel

s customers, such as Google and Microsoft together with other operators of big

data centres, are opting for more and more specialised processors from other

companies and are designing their own to boot.

Nvidia s GPUs are one example. They were created to carry out the massive,

complex computations required by interactive video games. GPUs have hundreds of

specialised cores (the brains of a processor), all working in parallel,

whereas CPUs have only a few powerful ones that tackle computing tasks

sequentially. Nvidia s latest processors boast 3,584 cores; Intel s server CPUs

have a maximum of 28.

The company s lucky break came in the midst of one of its near-death

experiences during the 2008-09 global financial crisis. It discovered that

hedge funds and research institutes were using its chips for new purposes, such

as calculating complex investment and climate models. It developed a coding

language, called CUDA, that helps its customers program its processors for

different tasks. When cloud computing, big data and AI gathered momentum a few

years ago, Nvidia s chips were just what was needed.

Every online giant uses Nvidia GPUs to give their AI services the capability to

ingest reams of data from material ranging from medical images to human speech.

The firm s revenues from selling chips to data-centre operators trebled in the

past financial year, to $296m.

And GPUs are only one sort of accelerator , as such specialised processors are

known. The range is expanding as cloud-computing firms mix and match chips to

make their operations more efficient and stay ahead of the competition.

Finding the right tool for the right job , is how Urs H lzle, in charge of

technical infrastructure at Google, describes balancing the factors of

flexibility, speed and cost.

At one end of the range are ASICs, an acronym for application-specific

integrated circuits . As the term suggests, they are hard-wired for one purpose

and are the fastest on the menu as well as the most energy-efficient. Dozens of

startups are developing such chips with AI algorithms already built in. Google

has built an ASIC called Tensor Processing Unit for speech recognition.

The other extreme is field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). These can be

programmed, meaning greater flexibility, which is why even though they are

tricky to handle, Microsoft has added them to many of its servers, for instance

those underlying Bing, its online-search service. We now have more FPGAs than

any other organisation in the world, says Mark Russinovich, chief technology

officer at Azure, the firm s computing cloud.

Time to be paranoid

Instead of making ASICS or FPGAs, Intel focused in recent years on making its

CPU processors ever more powerful. Nobody expects conventional processors to

lose their jobs anytime soon: every server needs them and countless

applications have been written to run on them. Intel s sales from the chips are

still growing. Yet the quickening rise of accelerators appears to be bad news

for the company, says Alan Priestley of Gartner, an IT consultancy. The more

computing happens on them, the less is done on CPUs.

One answer is to catch up by making acquisitions. In 2015 Intel bought Altera,

a maker of FPGAs, for a whopping $16.7bn. In August it paid more than $400m for

Nervana, a three-year-old startup that is developing specialised AI systems

ranging from software to chips. The firm says it sees specialised processors as

an opportunity, not a threat. New computing workloads have often started out

being handled on specialised processors, explains Diane Bryant, who runs Intel

s data-centre business, only to be pulled into the CPU later. Encryption, for

instance, used to happen on separate semiconductors, but is now a simple

instruction on the Intel CPUs which run almost all computers and servers

globally. Keeping new types of workload, such as AI, on accelerators would mean

extra cost and complexity.

If such integration occurs, Intel has already invested to take advantage. In

the summer it will start selling a new processor, code-named Knights Mill, to

compete with Nvidia. Intel is also working on another chip, Knights Crest,

which will come with Nervana technology. At some point, Intel is expected also

to combine its CPU s with Altera s FPGAs.

Predictably, competitors see the future differently. Nvidia reckons it has

already established its own computing platform. Many firms have written AI

applications that run on its chips, and it has created the software

infrastructure for other kinds of programmes, which, for instance, enable

visualisations and virtual reality. One decades-old computing giant, IBM, is

also trying to make Intel s life harder. Taking a page from open-source

software, the firm in 2013 opened its processor architecture, which is called

Power, turning it into a semiconductor commons of sorts. Makers of specialised

chips can more easily combine their wares with Power CPUs, and they get a say

in how the platform develops.

Much will depend on how AI develops, says Matthew Eastwood of IDC, a market

researcher. If it turns out not to be the revolution that many people expect,

and ushers in change for just a few years, Intel s chances are good, he says.

But if AI continues to ripple through business for a decade or more, other

kinds of processor will have more of a chance to establish themselves. Given

how widely AI techniques can be applied, the latter seems likely. Certainly,

the age of the big, hulking CPU which handles every workload, no matter how big

or complex, is over. It suffered, a bit like Humpty Dumpty, a big fall. And all

of Intel s horses and all of Intel s men cannot put it together again.

This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the

headline "Silicon crumble"