💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 5468.gmi captured on 2023-06-14 at 15:17:30. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
2015-07-03 10:02:56
Will wi-fi change how airlines keep us entertained above the clouds? Katia
Moskvitch reports.
By Katia Moskvitch
2 July 2015
In 1936, just over a decade after passenger air travel started with the
invention of the airship, the dirigible Zeppelin Hindenburg sported a
full-blown piano, along with a lounge, dining room, smoking room, and bar.
Before that, it was common for airships to have musicians playing on smaller
instruments such as accordions to help passengers while away the hours (and
days). Long flights, it seems, have always needed entertainment to stop people
getting bored.
After World War II and until the 1990s, the most plane passengers could expect
was a movie at the front of a cabin: first using a projector, and later shown
on a few sparse TV screens lowered from the ceiling. Some airlines also offered
music to passengers, first through little airtubes blowing sound into your
ears, and then later via some proper electric headphones plugged into a socket
in the seat s armrest.
Now of course, keeping passengers entertained is a serious business. And this
doesn t come cheap airlines spend as much as $15,000 on seats featuring
on-demand TV, movies or games as we tick off the miles. But in-flight
entertainment is about to go through another transformation, now that planes
are connected up to the internet and passengers can stream content right to
their personal gadgets. How will this change your flight experience?
On-demand streaming
One of the biggest game-changers for in-flight entertainment is the fact that
much faster internet connection is now available via satellite.
On board wi-fi has now become routine on many US flights, and other parts of
the globe are catching up. In many cases, though, it s not free: passengers
have to fork out around $5 ( 3.20) per hour, or $16 ( 10.25) for a full day s
access but more and more flights are providing the service. In the past five
years, more than 60 airlines using Airbus planes have committed to it, says
Gregor Dirks from Airbus.
Giving passengers wi-fi access in the air is about more than just satisfying
their hunger to stay connected
Despite the cost, access to inflight wi-fi does influence which aircraft and
airline passengers choose to fly, suggests a 2014 report by Honeywell
Aerospace. Two-thirds of our respondents are shopping for wi-fi-equipped
aircraft so they can remain productive, entertained and connected while in
flight. We also identified that passengers are willing to make sacrifices to
ensure their flight has wi-fi, including enduring airport security twice, and
early airport check in, if it meant faster wi-fi speeds, says Steven Brecken
of Honeywell Aerospace.
Often though, passengers are only able to browse the web, check emails and do
other low-bandwidth activities; streaming video services such as Netflix and
Amazon are blocked on many flights because of worries over bandwidth and
capacity.
But giving passengers wi-fi access in the air is about more than just
satisfying their hunger to stay connected. Fast, reliable on-board wi-fi can be
a boon to airlines: It may not be obvious to most, but the reason smaller,
narrow body aircrafts like B737s and A320s don t have fancy in-flight systems
is weight and cost, says Anahita Poonegar of InterTrust Technologies
Corporation, which makes inflight entertainment systems.
And they are costly all right IFE system maintenance was the third-largest
expense for Air France in 2011, for example after paying for the maintenance
of the engines and landing gear. They can cost up to $7.8m per aircraft,
depending on the type and configuration says Koen Spaanderman, engineer at
Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences. That means each seat costs up to
$15,000 to kit out.
Getting rid of these cost-hungry seats is already happening. In 2012, French
airline OpenSkies decided against wiring its fleet of Boeing 757s with a
traditional seat-back video system, but distributed to passengers 500 iPads
instead, each preloaded with an array of videos. This way, it spent about
$250,000 per plane instead of $3m ( 2m).
Content doesn t have to be limited to what s been preloaded by the airline
Since then, the technology has moved on, and now airlines want to take it a
step further aiming to deliver VOD (video on demand) that streams directly to
the passengers own devices using in-flight wi-fi. In North America, Southwest
Airlines, United, Delta and Jetstar are among companies allowing passengers to
stream videos to personal devices. Similar services are offered, among others,
by Australia s Qantas, Norwegian Air, Monarch and Germany s Lufthansa.
But the content doesn t have to be limited to what s been preloaded by the
airline. In early June, JetBlue Airways offered Amazon Prime to members while
in the air.
Roadblocks ahead
There are challenges, however,that stand in the way of industry-wide adoption,
not least finding enough bandwidth for fast enough speeds to allow seamless
streaming.
But companies are certain that this issue is temporary. Inmarsat s Global
Xpress satellite network, the UK's biggest commercial space project, is
scheduled to become operational later this year; two of its three satellites
are already in orbit. Instead of the most often offered Ku-band and L-band
satellites, GX will use the higher-frequency Ka-band that will boost in-flight
internet speeds significantly.
GX will be a dedicated satellite constellation for planes, says Brecken, and
with wi-fi speeds that will allow [passengers] to download movies, play video
games and stay connected just as they would on the ground. .
Beyond bandwidth issues, there are challenges such as battery life, stowage,
limited content options, and placement and viewing angles (some planes now
offer seat-back tablet-holders). And then there are the security risks of
having wi-fi that can be hacked onboard.
Another major problem is how to certify and roll-out such services across the
fleet, says Norbert Muller, a senior vice president at Lufthansa Systems. In
many cases the services are not free and the fees, especially for connectivity,
are usually much higher than you would expect them to be on ground.
Now passengers in the US are upset when their flight doesn t have wi-fi Al St
Germain, Spafax
So what does the future hold for air travellers? Malleable HD screens that can
bend, and 3D or virtual reality environments are all currently being looked
into. For instance, Transavia airline has recently started testing Oculus Rift
headsets in the air, offering them to passengers flying from Schiphol Airport
in Amsterdam to Barcelona.
And soon we may have holographic screens on board to talk to loved ones
hundreds of miles away, and even use special gloves to touch them.
Sounds far-fetched? These technologies are already with us, says Martin
Raymond, co-founder of The Future Laboratory that teamed up with travel search
engine Skyscanner to produce Future of Travel 2024 Report . Prototypes exist
hugely expensive now, but expected to fall in price as they hit the mass
market, says Raymond.
Yet it is always-on connectivity that may bring the biggest change in the near
future. Now passengers in the US are upset when their flight doesn t have
wi-fi, says Al St Germain, senior vice president USA at inflight marketing
company Spafax . The biggest challenge for any carrier is managing these
passenger expectations. Airlines often have to make very expensive decisions on
products and services years in advance how do you know what passengers will
be demanding next year or in 2017?
Terri Potratz, editor of APEX Experience magazine, agrees. Many treat their
in-flight experience as the last bastion of privacy, an opportunity to unplug;
though I think we re right on the tipping point of what passengers expect and
the shift towards constant connectivity is in motion, he says.