💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 1993.gmi captured on 2023-06-14 at 17:17:35. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
2010-04-21 12:35:21
Tue Apr 20, 10:57 am ET
Well, I guess this settles it as far as the authenticity of Gizmodo's iPhone 4G
scoop Monday. The definitive piece of evidence: a letter from Apple's top
lawyer, formally requesting the safe return of the wayward next-generation
iPhone the one left on a Redwood City barstool last month by a young (and
surely red-faced) Apple software engineer.
Gizmodo posted the letter late Monday, and the missive while firm in tone,
and signed by Apple General Counsel and Senior VP Bruce Sewell stops short of
making any legal threats, at least for the time being:
It has come to our attention that GIZMODO is currently in possession of a
device that belongs to Apple. This letter constitutes a formal request that you
return the device to Apple. Please let me know where to pick up the unit.
Gizmodo Editorial Director Brian Lam replied cheekily that the lost, radically
redesigned iPhone was "burning a hole in our pockets" and that he was "happy to
see it returned to its rightful owner" now that "we definitely know it's not
some knockoff."
The news came just hours after the bloggers Gizmodo described how a 27-year-old
software engineer at Apple (who is named and pictured in the post, by the way)
managed to leave the precious iPhone 4G prototype disguised to look like an
iPhone 3GS on a barstool at the Gourmet Haus Straut, a "nice German beer
garden" in Redwood City, about 20 miles northwest of Apple HQ in Cupertino.
(Engadget had blogged over the weekend that the phone was lost in a San Jose
watering hole, leading to some initial confusion.)
Having downed a few brews, the hapless Apple engineer eventually rolled out of
the bar, according to Gizmodo, absentmindedly leaving behind the
next-generation iPhone (which he'd been field testing, the post said). Hey, it
happens. (If I had a nickel for every time I left a credit card at a bar ... )
Another man in the bar ended up taking the phone home, peeled off the
protective jacket the next day, and realized he had a windfall on his hands.
And as we all now know, "weeks later, Gizmodo got it," says Gawker Media Inc.'s
Gizmodo leaving out a key detail that Nick Denton, founder of Gawker Media,
filled in later for the Associated Press: The company paid $5,000 for it.
What followed, I'm sure, was a scene similar to the wonderful sequence in the
BBC version of "State of Play": The editors huddled with their lawyers, the
crucial evidence (a suitcase of documents in "State of Play," an iPhone in the
case of Gizmodo) on a table before them, trying to suss out whether they should
write a story or call the police.
So, is Gizmodo in trouble? Hard to say, but the L.A. Times tech blog checked in
with UC Irvine law professor Henry Weinstein, who says Gizmodo is probably in
the clear: "Journalists generally do not get prosecuted for being in receipt of
stolen documents, as opposed to the person who received the documents and
turned them over." (It's worth noting that Gizmodo claims the iPhone in
question wasn't stolen merely "lost.")
Now, Apple may find some other way to punish the Gizmodo guys (who are fast
becoming the Merry Pranksters of tech bloggerdom) perhaps a different legal
route, or it may freeze out Gizmodo in terms of access to Apple reps and review
samples. Then again, Apple reportedly had already snubbed Gizmodo by refusing
to give it an advance review iPad, so ... sounds like Gizmodo's iPhone scoop
may have been sweet revenge for the spurned blog.
And c'mon: Here's Apple, perhaps the most infamously paranoid company of all
time, complete with triple-secret security zones, blackout curtains hung over
conference room windows, flashing red warning lights, prototype devices chained
to tables, and all that only to suffer the (arguably) worst security breach
in its history because some poor guy left the next iPhone on a barstool. The
irony is just too rich.
Of course, this is all inside baseball (albeit a fascinating game of inside
baseball); in the end, we're left with what appears to be an enticing new
iPhone, with a revamped design (flat and shiny on the front and back, trim
aluminum sides, thinner but a bit heavier), dual cameras (with a front-facing
lens for video chat), a bigger battery, and what appears to be a
higher-resolution display. The design may change between now and the final
shipping date after all, the phone Gizmodo snagged may only have been a
prototype but still, there's little question that the iPhone as we know it is
poised for some big changes.