💾 Archived View for mirrors.apple2.org.za › archive › apple.cabi.net › FAQs.and.INFO › SCSIandIDE › … captured on 2023-03-20 at 22:54:09.
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Path: news1.icaen!news.uiowa.edu!news1.chicago.cic.net!iagnet.net!204.71.0.61!peerfeed!newsfeed.internetmci.com!arclight.uoregon.edu!platform.uoregon.edu!cie-2.uoregon.edu!nparker From: nparker@cie-2.uoregon.edu (Neil Parker) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Subject: Re: SCSI CD-ROM Drive Date: 4 Sep 1997 06:59:11 GMT Organization: University of Oregon Campus Information Exchange Lines: 48 Message-ID: <5ulm7v$79h@platform.uoregon.edu> References: <5u1m99$cdt@milo.vcn.bc.ca> <tcpnntpd.17.8.28.8.51.32.3183328205.106365@lost-gonzo.com> <5ui38n$20$1@News.Dal.Ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: cie-2.uoregon.edu In article <5ui38n$20$1@News.Dal.Ca> at217@chebucto.ns.ca (Michael Hackett) writes: >sysop@lost-gonzo.com wrote: >> i thought the ramfast did not support scsi-2...... >> at least the scsi hd i tried did not work and i had rom f or something >> on the ramfast i believe it is. > >From what I've read, the RamFast (what is the proper capitalization >on that anyway? :-) ) does not support drives that are =strictly= >SCSI-2. The exact reason has slipped my mind (could be something to >do with arbitration, but I can't quite dig it up), but it is a >result of the way the RF works such that it does not need a SCSI ID >itself. Most drives still follow the SCSI-1 rules as well as support- >ing the SCSI-2 command set and additional features, but I suppose >that as time goes on, manufacturers will start dumping the old SCSI-1 >backwards compatibility. > >Anyone, please feel free to step in and correct or clarify anything >I've written above. It was a while ago that I ran into this infor- >mation and I'm just posting in case no one else does. The problem is with two SCSI-1 options only partly supported under SCSI-2.