💾 Archived View for gmi.derschwarzestrahler.at › en › gemlog › relog › gemlog-responses › update1.gm… captured on 2023-03-20 at 17:51:48. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
It looks like my idea for the gemlog responses is not as good as I thought in my nativity. Sean Conner gave a critical response:
RE: It still surprises me what some find difficult to do
To sum it up, my idea is rather a hacky workaround for gemini-servers without CGI than a genius idea. I get the point.
As I wrote in the initial post, I am not an expert in programming and have a non-IT engineering background. Nevertheless I have some coding experience (I do some Python coding every now and then), so I understand the argument, that log-parsing is in the more complex than a CGI script. I also have to say that I wrote this post from my perspective, self-hosting my gemini capsule on a virtual Rootserver, which gives me access to all Logs. I see the point, that not every user has access to this.
One more sidenote: In my job I often see, how a lack of IT experience from decision-makers combined with a completely unrealistic underestimation of complexity leads to bad systems with a bad cost-benefit ratio. That's why I'm quite cautious when it comes to IT-topics. I hope this cautiousness was recognisable in my initial article.
Feel free to respond or comment via e-mail:
CC BY-SA 4.0 Martin Marot-Perz, 04.01.2023
╭────────╮ ╔═════╗
╭─╯████████╰─╮ ╔═══╗ ╚═╗
╭╯████████████╰╮ ╔══╗╚═╗ ╚╗
╭╯██████████████╰╮╔═╗╚╗ ╚╗ ╚╗
│████████████████ ║ ║ ║ ║
╰╮██████████████╭╯╚═╝╔╝ ╔╝ ╔╝
╰╮████████████╭╯ ╚══╝╔═╝ ╔╝
╰─╮████████╭─╯ ╚═══╝ ╔═╝
╰────────╯ ╚═════╝