💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 5053.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 18:06:59. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Tortoise versus hare at work

2014-03-21 10:44:44

Sydney Finkelstein

Pity the tortoise in the 21st century. Stolid, careful, slowly-but-surely the

ways of the tortoise seem quaint in the face of an onslaught of hares running

amok , whether creating new businesses (Facebook, Amazon, Alibaba) or

disrupting old ones (Uber, Roku, Coursera).

But remember, in the classic Aesop's fable it is the plodding tortoise, and not

the speedy hare, that crossed the finish line first.

Is it possible that the tortoise could still win today? And what of the hare

so quick but impulsive and unschooled, calling to mind the all-nighter young

executives at the helm of companies today? How important is experience, and

even age, to successful leadership in an era where speed has become a business

goal in and of itself? The answers may surprise you.

Experience may not bring speed, but it does bring a greater ability to reflect

and put into perspective what is happening around you.

There s no denying the need for speed. Start-ups spend more time on pivots, a

fancy word for changing direction or business strategy, than ever before, while

incremental improvements are probably the best we ll ever see from more

bureaucratic companies. But the devaluation of experience and that means age,

too has gone so far that wisdom has fallen out of the very definition of

business intelligence.

The arrival of the Internet era has meant youth has never been more highly

valued by the business community. Silicon Valley companies every second one

seemingly started by a Harvard University dropout (Microsoft founder Bill

Gates; Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg) are not only reinventing how

businesses are run, they are also leveraging their success to breathe new life

into how philanthropies are run and how governments should be run.

After all, when Zuckerberg calls US President Barack Obama to lecture him on

the abuses of the US National Security Agency never mind the irony of this

coming from the creator of a company wholly-dependent on people revealing

private information about themselves to public audiences all bets are off.

The hares are surely running away with it.

The danger of generalising

Except for one little, but very important sleight of mind.

One of the most enduring human biases is that we tend to generalise from very

small sample sizes. So there s Zuckerberg, Gates, the Google guys, Jack Ma of

soon-to-IPO Alibaba, and a bunch of other successful entrepreneurs who made it

big in their twenties. But what about the tens of thousands, maybe hundreds of

thousands, of other twenty-somethings that have failed as business builders?

Don t believe me? The crowdsourcing fundraiser Kickstarter helped raise money

for more than 19,000 business ideas in 2013, the majority of which were set up

by people in their twenties and thirties. But how many actually created going

concerns, let alone became profitable? Venture capitalists have built an

industry on the premise that they only need to win big in one out of every 10

investments. Even TV shows like Dragons Den or Shark Tank demonstrate how few

young entrepreneurs can really make it.

The new business failure rate in the US is so high 50% fail within 5 years,

according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics that organisational

sociologists have been calling the phenomenon the liability of newness for

decades. Not all businesses are started by young entrepreneurs, of course, but

that s what most people believe. Even venture capitalists prefer younger

founders.

So, youth dominates in entrepreneurship as it does in the wider culture. Does

it also influence the decisions big companies make on talent? That s not a

rhetorical question.

It s not a good thing to be over 50 years old and working in a big company.

When redundancies come, you re often first in line to go because you re more

expensive. Ironically, one of the reasons there s been an upswing in start-ups

from entrepreneurs in their fifties is that they didn t have a choice. Once you

re unemployable, you have to figure it out for yourself.

Experience counts, really

I think it s time we counted up the real losses that arise from the devaluation

of experience, not just for older workers and managers caught up in the

societal meme but for the businesses that are left behind, required to fend for

themselves with one hand effectively tied behind their back.

Experience may not bring speed, but it does bring a greater ability to reflect

and put into perspective what is happening around you. And yes, it does bring

deeper compassion for the people we live among, at work and at home. Some

people call that wisdom.

Once you ve lived a little, the illusion of perfection has long gone. In fact,

you ve seen how the perfectionists you once worked with have moved on, unable

to adapt to the messiness of everyday business.

Once you ve lived a little, it becomes harder to go about your work without

paying closer attention to colleagues and empathising with those around you.

More likely, you can t help but see the nuances and subtleties of work that

less-experienced managers do not see. As a result, you re better able to

motivate others because you know what makes them tick. And you re better able

to influence others when you don t have direct authority over them. That s the

hallmark of the effective leader.

Once you ve lived a little, you ve seen bear markets and not just bull markets,

and you ve been forced to navigate around geopolitical events that periodically

disrupt business plans.

In fact, your skill set is exactly what inexperienced entrepreneurs need, yet

so often don t value.

Of course, experienced leaders don t automatically make the right calls, but

they ve got perspective and they use it. And they can be bold when

opportunities arise. Surely we would all say that about Larry Ellison, the CEO

of Oracle who has generated more than a 25% annual return on shareholder equity

over a 40-year career at the top. And is there anyone out there who doubts

83-year-old Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffet s ability to outthink the

competition as he adds year after year to his legend as one of the world s

greatest investors?

So yes, leaders can get better with age. The youthful hare may talk a good

game, but my money s on the tortoise.