💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 3888.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 18:57:06. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
2012-03-14 18:06:05
At Fog Creek Software, every worker at the same level is paid the same salary.
And when one gets a raise, they all do
What would happen if you got to work one day, went into the kitchen, and saw a
list of your employees' salaries taped to the fridge? Would you freak out?
Would you expect to find half of your staff weeping and the other half waiting
with pitchforks outside your office door?
Because salary information is viewed as particularly sensitive, employers often
go to great lengths to keep it under wraps. Some companies even make it a
fireable offense for employees to compare salaries, or they write something
into the standard employment contract prohibiting workers from disclosing their
pay. (In the United States, this kind of rule is unenforceable, by the way, but
some bosses hope their workers won't know that.) The trouble with keeping
salaries a secret is that it's usually used as a way to avoid paying people
fairly. And that's not good for employees -- or the company.
When my partner and I started Fog Creek Software, we knew that we wanted to
create a pay scale that was objective and transparent. As I researched
different systems, I found that a lot of employers tried to strike a balance
between having a formulaic salary scale and one that was looser by setting a
series of salary "ranges" for employees at every level of the organization. But
this felt unfair to me. I wanted Fog Creek to have a salary scale that was as
objective as possible. A manager would have absolutely no leeway when it came
to setting a salary. And there would be only one salary per level.
After some digging, I found a Seattle-area software-consulting firm called
Construx that had published on its website the outline of a decent professional
ladder system (read about it at construx.com/?nid=244). It reminded me of the
old pay system at Microsoft, which had worked pretty well when I was there. We
used this model as a rough basis for our system, although we added some
flourishes. I posted the first draft on my blog and got tons of great feedback,
which I used to write up the second draft. The basic system has remained in
place ever since.
In Fog Creek's system, every employee is assigned a level. Currently, these
levels range from 8 (for a summer intern) to 16 (for me). Your level is
calculated formulaically based on three factors: experience, scope of
responsibility, and skill set. Once we determine your number, you make the same
as every other employee at that level.
The experience part is pretty easy: It's based on the number of years of
full-time experience you have in the field you're working in. No work done
while you were still in school counts, and certain types of rote, menial work
can never add up to more than a year of experience. If you worked as a
receptionist for six years, for example, you aren't credited with six years of
experience; I give you credit for one year.
Scope is pretty easy, too. Are you primarily helping someone else do his or her
job? Do you have your own area of responsibility? Or are you running a whole
product? We are able to define the scope of most jobs pretty objectively.
Quantifying skill is a little bit harder, but we still find it possible to
define a fairly objective continuum from a newbie programmer ("Is learning the
basic principles of software engineering; works under close supervision; not
expected to write production code") to an expert programmer ("Has consistently
had major success during participation in all aspects of small and large
projects and has been essential to those projects' successes").
Once we defined our terms, we created a little chart that assigns a level based
on an employee's experience, skill, and scope (a section of it appears on the
previous page, and the whole thing is posted at joelonsoftware.com/articles/
ladder.html). Then, we created another chart that lists the base salaries for
each level, and that's how we figure out how much an employee makes.
Once a year, my management team sits down, reviews every employee's work, and
recalculates every employee's level. Then we look at competitive market
salaries using online tools such as Salary.com and Glassdoor.com, and we
consider our own knowledge of the job market from the past year of recruiting
and make sure that the salaries we have at each level are exactly where we want
them to be.
Because everyone at the same level gets the same salary -- no fudging -- we
sometimes run into difficulty. One problem with our system reveals itself when
we're pursuing an employee who wants to negotiate for a higher salary.
Sometimes this occurs when we find a great person who is currently being paid a
salary that, in our view, is way above market. And sometimes this occurs when a
potential hire just expects a reasonable amount of back-and-forth over salary
because almost every other employer he has ever worked for maintains ambiguous
salary ranges and there is always room to get paid better if you negotiate
well. We usually address these situations by guaranteeing the recruit a larger
first-year bonus than he would normally get. Here's the thing: Fog Creek is
extremely profitable, and we have a generous profit-sharing plan, so the
"guaranteed first-year bonus" is almost always less than the employee's
profit-sharing bonus would have been anyway.
Our system was put to the test over the past eight years when the labor market
was tight. It's easy to see why: Suppose you hire 100 yak drivers at $10 an
hour, but then the Tibetan economy heats up, and you have trouble finding more
yak drivers. The market rate might rise to $15 an hour. The weak-kneed thing to
do is to hire new employees at $15 and hope that the senior people don't
discover that the rookies are making more money than they are.
This is technically called salary inversion -- if you're the kind of person who
likes to use self-important HR jargon. Salary inversion can lead to strife
within an organization. It can also completely warp the relationships among
managers, HR, and employees. This may seem ridiculous and sound apocryphal, but
I actually once heard that managers at a major corporation told their key
employees to quit and reapply for their old jobs, because the bureaucracy had
made it nearly impossible to give them raises that reflected the competitive
job market. At Fog Creek, we decided that the right thing to do when the labor
market tightens is to give raises to everybody at the same level. This move can
be painful and expensive, but the alternative is worse. I don't know about you,
but I'm scared of pitchforks.
I can't guarantee that our system would hold up if margins were to erode, but
I'm pretty sure that employees would be willing to accept slightly lower
salaries as long as the system were transparent and fair, and it were clear
what you needed to do to move up the ladder.
At the same time, if you hear a lot of griping about salaries, you shouldn't
look just at your system for paying people. One thing I've learned from
experience is that happy, motivated employees who are doing work they love and
feel they are being treated as adults don't gripe about money unless their pay
is egregiously unfair. If you hear a lot of complaints about salaries, I
suspect that's probably a manifestation of a much bigger disease: Your
employees aren't deriving enough personal satisfaction from their work, or they
are miserable for other reasons.
It takes a lot of salary to make up for a cruel boss or a prisonlike workplace.
And rather than adjusting pay, you might choose to focus on some nonmonetary
ways to make employees happy. Happy employees make better products and provide
better customer service and will make your company successful and profitable.
And success allows you to pay workers better. It's a virtuous circle, and it
has worked for Fog Creek. Let me know if it works for you.
Joel Spolsky is the co-founder and CEO of Fog Creek Software and the host of
the popular blog Joel on Software. For an archive of his columns, go to
www.inc.com/keyword/spolsky.
"How Hard Could It Be?" columnist Joel Spolsky is the co-founder and CEO of Fog
Creek Software in New York City, and the host of the popular and influential
blog Joel on Software. Most recently, he co-founded Stack Overflow, a
question-and-answer site for software developers. @spolsky