đŸ Archived View for library.inu.red âș file âș prairie-struggle-dispatch-from-ecuador.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 13:29:57. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
âĄïž Next capture (2024-06-20)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Dispatch from Ecuador Author: Prairie Struggle Date: 2014 Language: en Topics: Ecuador, reportback Source: Retrieved on July 8, 2014 from https://web.archive.org/web/20140708223521/http://www.prairiestruggle.org/news/dispatch-ecuador-prairie-struggle-members-reporting
I have been living in the Andean mountains of Ecuador for about eight
months. I live just outside the city of Azogues, about twenty minutes
away from the city of Cuenca, which is an incredibly metropolitan city
of about half a million people. I have also had the privilege of
travelling the country, to the ocean city of Salinas, to Guayaquil (the
largest city in Ecuador and center of business), to Quito (the capital
of Ecuador), and many places in between. I think I was unprepared for
how beautiful a mega-biodiverse country as small as Ecuador truly is. I
also tried to arrive in this country with as few preconceived notions as
possible, while at the same time researching as much as I could before
arriving. The purpose of this article is not to crap on Ecuador, a
country I have come to love, nor to purvey that I speak for the people
of Ecuador, because thatâs not the case either. I want to dispel the
idea that political leftism is more prominent here in South America than
in the North.
Of course, president Rafael Correa does belong to an alliance in South
America of âleftist leadersâ, but after living here for almost a year,
Iâm just not sure what that means â aside from the rhetoric used to piss
off the United States in particular. Now, to be sure, immense progress
has been made in Ecuador in a relatively short period of time. If you
want to give yourself nightmares for a month, Google âEcuador and
Chevronâ to see how this oil company nearly destroyed a country, not to
mention one of the most important rainforests in the world. About 20
years ago, people were still leaving Ecuador in droves, culminating in
the currency being so devalued that Ecuador switched to the U.S. dollar.
My partner, a citizen of Ecuador, remembers a large piece of
tear-inducing graffiti in the central plaza of our city, reading âlast
person to leave, please turn out the lightsâ. This has changed
immensely. Infrastructure has improved by leaps and bounds, creating a
lot of jobs. For example, from our location it used to take fifteen to
eighteen hours to drive to the capital of Quito; it now takes only six
to eight hours. The abject poverty that was a reality for so many, has
also improved drastically. The road stops that were manned by either
corrupt police looking for bribes, or just straight-up thieves in
uniforms, are now abandoned. Many of these changes are a result of
president Correaâs policies.
However, one need only to travel outside the areas of tourism and U.N.
World Heritage Sites to see how the working poor still suffer. As with
the rest of the world, these improvements have widened the gap between
the wealthy and the working class. In Guayaquil, the center of business
in Ecuador, the poverty is stark and in your face no matter which part
of the city you are in. In the capital of Quito, the disparity between
the classes is marked by disturbing differences. Once you leave the
areas marked by the glittering temples of consumerism, government, and
tourism you will see that the roads in the neighbourhoods of the poor
are not even paved. Will this change as improvements continue? Only time
will tell; certainly many of the statements made by Correa are
encouraging. He speaks often and specifically of ending discrimination
against the marginalized communities of Ecuador; of being firmly against
American imperialism; of protecting the environment; and improving the
lives of all the citizens of Ecuador.
Itâs just that a lot of Correaâs recent actions are so damn scary. When
I say recent, Iâm talking in my time living here. Itâs incredibly
difficult to take the good stuff seriously when the presidentâs actions
are so bizarrely the opposite. Letâs look at a couple of examples of
what is happening in Ecuador under president Correa, and see if we canât
infuse some reality into the preconceived notions of institutionalized
leftism we in the North seem to hold about the South.
In 2007, president Correa went before the General Assembly of the United
Nations and announced that he had taken the Yasuni portion of the Amazon
rainforest hostage. I stand against capitalism and for the environment,
he seemed to say... but pay up or we start choppinâ limbs! Tree limbs,
that isâŠ
Dubbed the YasunĂ-ITT Initiative, Correa said that in exchange for half
the value of the oil under this portion of the Amazon, he would leave it
untouched, halting all plans to drill for the crude beneath. In perhaps
the most expensive hostage taking of all time, he gave the rest of the
world six years to âdonateâ $3.6 billion to save the rainforest. Correa
made this announcement with all the altruistic pomp he could muster,
speaking persuasively about saving the culture of isolated Indigenous
tribes, preventing insane levels of CO2 from being released, not to
mention that itâs just straight up repugnant (for lack of a better
phrase) to picture an oil slick running through the pristine Amazon.
However, this deadline has come and gone, putting Ecuador in a seriously
tough position because the country really, really needs the money from
extracting this oil.
Iâd like to be very clear about the vital importance and unique nature
of Yusani National Park. This part of the Amazon is one of the most
biologically diverse areas on earth. Scientists have discovered 655
species of trees in one hectare of land in the park, more than the total
recorded in the U.S and Canada combined. It has been declared a world
biosphere reserve by UNESCO. Some 4,000 plant species, 173 species of
mammals, and 610 bird species live inside the Park. It contains more
documented insect species than any other forest in the world, and is
among the most diverse forests in the world for different species of
birds, bats, amphibians, epiphytes, and lianas. Yasuni is a critical
habitat for 23 globally threatened mammal species, including the giant
otter, the Amazonian manatee, pink river dolphin, giant anteater, and
Amazonian tapir... Ten primate species live in the Yasuni, including the
threatened white-bellied spider monkey. (Wikipedia, UNESCO, Journal
Nature) But back to the hostage taking.
Anarchist groups like Prairie Struggle incorporate environmental
concerns into their campaigns and platforms not only to protect the
global commons, but also because these issues are always part of the
struggle against capitalism and the commodification of our environment.
This figures particularly into Correaâs treatment of oil extraction in
the Amazon region of Yusani, for Ecuador needs the money anticipated
from the hostage taking to pay back considerable loans from China. When
the international community paid only about $100 million of the demanded
ransom, Correa scrapped the YasunĂ-ITT Initiative on August 15^(th) of
this year. Some drilling has already commenced, predictably leading to
the same old language (utilized by Correa in an act of supreme irony
given his original speech to the U.N.) of colonization of Indigenous
tribes, not to mention over-hunting and deforestation.
Oh yes, Correaâs a real socialist enemy of the state, huh?
I would like to metaphorically introduce you to a cool dude named Jaime
Guevara. He is an active, very well known anarchist and musician (the
two often overlap) based out of Quito, Ecuador. After Guevara gave what
Correa interpreted to be an âobscene gestureâ on August 31^(st) of this
year, the president of Ecuador declared him an alcoholic and drug addict
that was not to be trusted. Correa began a swift smear campaign again
this known anarchist that did not go well. You see, what Correa
ignorantly assumed were the effects of alcohol and drugs, were actually
the effects of the medications that Guevara takes for his epilepsy.
As soon as people who know Guevara started jumping to his defense,
clarifying that he has a neurological disorder, not to mention that he
never drinks or does drugs both out of personal choice as well as
needing to take medications that make it dangerous to consume either,
youâd think that Correa would simply have apologized and the two men
would have returned to their respective corners of our antiquated
political spectrum. But the presidentâs first response was quite
preposterous. âHow are we to know the brat has a neurological problem?â,
Correa said. No apology would ever come. Of course, there was widespread
support for Guevara, some of which, ironically, would not have come if
not for Correaâs actions. And it got worse⊠much worse. As if to counter
the support that Guevara was receiving, Correa continued his misguided
smear campaign. The president clarified in response to the backlash that
Guevara was a spoiled liar, is a dangerous anarchist with left-leaning
militancy, and that his disease causes him to be violently aggressive
especially against those who disagree with his views.
Correa, who often touts his dedication to eradicate discrimination in
Ecuador, essentially vilified all those suffering from epilepsy, which
is pretty damn low. Also interesting is that Correa has enacted a law in
Ecuador that states that journalists who lie in their publications can
be prosecuted and be sent to jail. Most recently, this law has been
extended to social media in Ecuador, including Facebook and Twitter. But
what of Correa lying in the media? While I doubt that there exists a
government in the world that is a big fan of the anarchists seeking to
topple their system, Correaâs actions increasingly (and disturbingly)
reflect the type of bubble he rules from. Watch out if you donât agree
with the president, as there will be consequences. Oh, and itâs well
worth noting that Guevara is opposed to the exploitation of the Yasuni
National Park and has been actively engaged in the organizing against
this government action.
Many that consider themselves part of the institutionalized left in
North America look to South America as a political haven of 21^(st)
century socialism; but what makes the president of Ecuador any better
than the president of America? We are anarcho-communists, and a
government is a government is a government. None are better than the
other under capitalism, though some can surely be worse. Just as in most
of the world, in Ecuador the environment is still exploited (despite the
fact that the environment is constitutionally protected), and anarchists
are still vilified. These are merely two examples demonstrating how our
current system really makes one country no better than another.
What unites us is that the working class is universally exploited by the
few that hold the power, sometimes more violently, sometimes more
latently. Let us not be divided, nor misled, by the borders we seek to
abolish.
By Stacey and Michael (Regina Branch)