💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › leo-tolstoy-tolstoy-letter-on-suicide.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 12:18:47. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Tolstoy Letter on Suicide
Author: Leo Tolstoy
Date: 1898
Language: en
Topics: letter, suicide
Source: Original text from http://www.revoltlib.com/?id=10669, 2021.

Leo Tolstoy

Tolstoy Letter on Suicide

The question “Has a man in general the right to kill himself?” is

incorrectly put. There can be no question of “right”. If he is able to

do it, then he has the right. I think that the possibility of killing

oneself is a safety-valve. Having it, man has no right (here the

expression “right” is appropriate) to say that life is unbearable.

If it were impossible to live, then one would kill oneself; and

consequently one cannot speak of life as being unbearable. The

possibility of killing himself has been given to man, and therefore he

may (he has the right to) kill himself, and he continually uses this

right — when he kills himself in duels, in war, by dissipation, wine,

tobacco, opium, etc.

The question can only be as to whether it is reasonable and moral (the

reasonable and moral always coincide) to kill oneself. No, it is

unreasonable; as unreasonable as to cut off the shoots of a plant which

one wishes to destroy; it will not die, but will merely grow

irregularly..

Life is indestructible; it is beyond time and space, therefore death can

only change its form, arrest its manifestation in this world. But having

arrested it in this world, I, first, do not know whether its

manifestation in another world will be more pleasant to me; and,

secondly, I deprive myself of the possibility of experiencing and

acquiring by my ego all that could be acquired in this world.

Besides this, and above all, it is unreasonable because by arresting my

life owing to its apparent unpleasantness, I hereby show that I have a

perverted idea of the object of my life, assuming that its object is my

pleasure — whereas its objects, on the other hand, personal perfection,

and on the other, the service of that work which is being accomplished

by the whole life of the Universe.

It is for the same reason that suicide is also immoral. Life in its

entirety, and the possibility of living until natural death, have been

given to man only on the condition that he serve the life of the

Universe. But, having profited by life so long as it was pleasant, he

refuses to serve the Universe as soon as life becomes unpleasant:

whereas, in all probability, his service commenced precisely when life

began to appear unpleasant. All work appears at first unpleasant.

In the Optin Monastery, for more than thirty years, there lay on the

floor a monk smitten with paralyzes, who had the use of his left hand

only. The doctors said that he was sure to suffer much, but not only did

he refrain from complaining of his position, but incessantly making the

sign of the cross, and looking at the icons, he smilingly expressed his

gratitude to God and joy in that spark of life which flickered in him.

Tens of thousands of visitors came to see him, and it is difficult to

imagine all the good which flowed into the world through this man,

though deprived of the possibility of any activity. Certainly he did

more good than thousands and thousands of healthy people who imagine

that in various institutions they are serving the world.

While there is life in man, he can perfect himself and serve the

Universe. But he can serve the Universe only by perfecting himself, and

perfect himself only by serving the Universe.