💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › wayne-sheridan-farmer-anarchist-catholic.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 14:52:47. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Farmer, Anarchist, Catholic
Author: Wayne Sheridan
Date: September 1, 2014
Language: en
Topics: Catholicism, interview, religion
Source: Retrieved on 3rd August 2022 from https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/farmer-anarchist-catholic

Wayne Sheridan

Farmer, Anarchist, Catholic

Tom Cornell has been a part of the Catholic Worker movement for more

than sixty years. He started in 1953 when he was nineteen years old. By

then, the movement, founded by Dorothy Day and Peter Maurin, had been

around for twenty years. Day was still leading the movement, and Cornell

often worked with her, especially as a writer and editor for the

Catholic Worker newspaper, to which he still contributes. He has also

been a leading peace activist, one of the first to publicly protest the

Vietnam War. Tom’s wife Monica was born into a Catholic Worker family;

her parents joined shortly after its founding.

Tom and Monica have lived for many years at the Peter Maurin Farm in

Marlborough, New York, about seventy miles north of New York City. Tom

and Monica’s dedication to the corporal works of mercy is evident as

soon as you meet them. The farm functions as a house of hospitality for

the formerly homeless and for men recovering from addiction or

struggling with physical or mental impairments. The farm also provides

rooms for a few volunteers and, occasionally, visiting guests.

The following interview took place primarily in the kitchen of the

farm’s “Green House.” Most of the men live in a second house, called the

“White House,” which includes a communal dining room and a chapel. There

are a few other buildings on the farm, including a hermitage in the

woods and a small residence for a beekeeper, who also serves as

caretaker of the walking trails on the farm’s property (about fifty

acres). The organic farm supplies most of the food for the residents, as

well as fresh produce for St. Joseph House and Maryhouse, Manhattan’s

two Catholic Worker houses. The Peter Maurin Farm also brings produce to

a soup kitchen in Newburgh, New York.

Wayne Sheridan: Thank you, Tom, for welcoming me back to Peter Maurin

Farm, and for sitting down for an interview on the occasion of the

eightieth anniversary of the Catholic Worker movement.

Tom Cornell: There was a period of time, about ten years—five during the

time of Dorothy’s final illness, and five years after her death—during

which the future of the movement was much in doubt. Dorothy was such a

dominant figure. She really held everything together. We have, however,

managed to survive and grow, with much trial and error.

As you know, Peter Maurin Farm is one of the Catholic Worker houses. We

are part of the New York Catholic Workers, which include St. Joseph

House and Maryhouse in Manhattan and, of course, the Catholic Worker

newspaper. I suppose we might be called a sort of “mother house” of the

movement. Today I believe there are about 217 houses worldwide, 195 in

the United States—the most in our history.

Peter Maurin Farm is quite engrossing for all of us. Monica, my wife, is

really the heart and soul of the place. And Tommy, our son, runs the

farming operation and does most of the maintenance. And I? Well, I’m not

sure what I do besides hang out and help where I can.

WS: You still write often?

TC: Well, I do write when I can. A twenty-nine-page article of mine on

“Christian Anarchism” has just been published in Vienna, in German. They

seemed very pleased with it. And American Catholic Studies will be

publishing an article I wrote about the Catholic Worker’s relationship

to Communism, Communists, and the Communist Party. I am pleased with

that.

I’ve been active in a new group called Catholic Scholars for Equal

Justice whose meeting in California I was able to attend and about which

I wrote recently in the Catholic Worker. The organization and the

article have had a very, very positive response. But I’m not able to

travel or write as much as I’d like to because of age.

WS: When were you born?

TC: I was born in 1934. The world seemed very stable to me when I was

young, especially the Catholic world. We still had the same pope two

years after I finished college as we did when I was very young—that was

Pius XII, of course.

WS: I haven’t been involved with the Catholic Worker movement since my

years in college some decades ago. But it seems to me that the core

values of the organization have not changed—that is, the focus remains

on the practice of the corporal works of mercy and peace work.

TC: “Peace activism,” to be precise. In fact “activism” is a very apt

word for all we try to do. In the Bible we read, “I was hungry and you

fed me.” It does not say, “I was hungry and you formed a committee”! Our

thing is just getting down and doing it. And that’s what keeps us sane.

A perfectionist group like ours can get off the track by becoming a

little sect, but we try to avoid that by being grounded in reality.

WS: What reality keeps you grounded?

TC: The poor. People come to the Catholic Worker, and even if they stay

only a few years, or even just a few months, they often find their

vocation. Few of us aspire to living among the poor as a career path.

But, our modus operandi is direct action and works of mercy in small

intentional communities. We live in voluntary poverty. There is no

distinction between staff and guests. That’s the way it has always been,

and it’s been fun.

In fact, John Cort, the socialist leader [and a former Commonweal

editor], remembered when he first met Dorothy. She was giving a talk and

she seemed to be having so much fun that he thought, “I might like to

try that too. Have some of that fun.” So he became a Catholic Worker.

WS: You mentioned that there was a young Muslim man staying at St.

Joseph’s House in the city. How long has he been a resident there?

TC: About a year, maybe a bit longer. He goes to a mosque on Tenth or

Eleventh Street. It’s a bit conservative. He’s a resident volunteer at

St. Joseph’s and he helps around the house.

WS: What do you mean by “conservative”?

TC: The mosque does not have interfaith programs or sensibilities. As

you know, the Catholic Worker movement welcomes volunteers who are not

Catholic and who want to experience the way we live and who wish to

serve the poor. Some of these non-Catholic volunteers go on to found or

join intentional communities in their own faith traditions. A few

convert. We’ve also had many Jewish Catholic Workers over the years. We

don’t discriminate as to who can be called a Catholic Worker, just as we

don’t discriminate as to whom we serve.

WS: How do you keep the farm going with so few workers?

TC: We used to have two very good and strong men in addition to Tommy,

our son, and then they left. One, Tim is off to Italy, following the

woman he fell in love with, and they are both now trying to open a

Catholic Worker house to serve immigrants, appealing to the Italian

church to let them use abandoned church-owned buildings. And the other,

Michael, is in Massachusetts trying to open an intentional-community

farm to serve mentally challenged adult men. We admire them and

encouraged them, but it has left us short-handed as most of the guests

living here are unable to do the type of physical labor needed on the

farm. Somehow we made it through the bulk of the harvest in 2013.

WS: When I helped your son deliver fresh produce to St. Joseph’s House

in Manhattan, it was beautiful how all the volunteers came out to help

unload the van, sort it, and store the produce in the basement storage

areas—all with such joy and enthusiasm.

TC: We have people who come to our houses and are used to eating junk

food. Some of them continue the bad habit, but we try to provide all

organically grown vegetables and some fresh fruit and eggs. The meals at

St. Joseph’s are much, much better than they were when we were young. It

was awful then. Dorothy was a typical American in that she just focused

on the basics of food. But at least she did know that you don’t put

onion in a fruit salad, which is what one of our volunteer chefs would

often do.

Monica is our prime cook here on the farm, and she does an excellent

job. We do have a guest who was once in the catering business, and he

will cook the communal meals once or twice a week.

WS: In the early days of the Catholic Worker the emphasis was on feeding

the urban poor, and all else was secondary. Since then, the movement

seems to have widened its focus to other things, including ecology.

TC: Actually, there was no real awareness of the polluting of our planet

in the general public. The awareness was not there in the early part of

the twentieth century—and not even in the 1950s, ’60s, and ’70s. But I

think we in the Catholic Worker movement anticipated it, almost

providentially, much earlier. Caring for what is now called the

“biosphere” was a central part of Peter Maurin’s philosophy. We have had

small farms and have been pioneers in the modern “back to the earth”

movement for most our existence.

Today we all have to learn to live more simply and more responsibly. It

amazes me that the short-term goals of the very rich dictate the

policies in this country—policies from which their grandchildren will

suffer no less than our grandchildren. We have the rapid disappearance

of whole species. What happens when the sea can no longer support fish

because of acidity? What happens when large populations migrate out of

regions that can no longer support them? The Maldives Islands are

putting away money to buy a new homeland.

Also, the importance of employing active nonviolence was something I

believe we were ahead of the curve on. Dorothy would not support U.S.

participation in World War II. She urged men to refuse the draft. That

was a minority position within society and within the Catholic Worker

community itself. She was adamant about it. She welcomed back people who

went to the war, but she never wavered from her commitment to pacifism.

No one was sure whether a Catholic could be a conscientious objector

when I applied for that status in 1956. It took four years for the

Selective Service system to grant me an exemption as a conscientious

objector. I had no idea why it took so long. I had assumed that somebody

was doing my family a favor by putting my file at the bottom of some big

pile of paper. My godfather John Cornell was a well-known jurist and a

leader of the Democratic Party in Bridgeport, Connecticut, where we

lived. I thought they were just protecting someone with the name of

Cornell. It was an embarrassment.

But Fr. Ned Hogan, chair of the theology department at Fairfield

University, told me years later that my application was submitted for

review to the National Catholic Welfare Conference, which was what the

bishops conference was called at the time. Originally it was called the

Catholic War Council because it really was an open question: Can a

Catholic be a conscientious objector? And most people assumed the answer

was no. That was for Quakers, Mennonites, and Jehovah’s Witnesses.

The theologians said they would not make a judgment on this because they

never studied it; it was not in their manuals at the seminary. They had

just-war theory, and that was it. Finally, Fr. Hogan, who wasn’t himself

a pacifist because he couldn’t imagine excepting himself from the Irish

war, guided my study of the question. He said pacifism was orthodox; my

position was contrary to nothing in Catholic teaching. Later on, the

U.S. bishops’ 1985 pastoral letter on peace recognized pacifism as a

legitimate strain in Catholic tradition in addition to just-war theory.

The preferential option for the poor, which has been at the heart of

Catholic Worker activism since our founding, has also become central in

American Catholic thinking. There is now a higher awareness of the needs

and just claims of the poor. But there is need for more work here. In

the War on Poverty, poverty has won.

WS: I’m curious about the relationship of Catholic Workers to politics.

TC: It’s indirect. We do not get involved in politics per se. I knew a

Catholic Worker who was a Republican and later became a Christian

anarchist.

WS: Could you define what you mean by “Christian anarchist”?

TC: In 1954, Robert Ludlow, whom Dorothy named our “chief theorist,”

renounced the use of the word “anarchism,” saying it belongs to others,

not ourselves. He was quite bitter about it. He eventually left the

movement. At that time Ammon Hennacy’s brand of anarchism appealed to

many of the younger people in the movement. Ludlow was a scholar—of

Aquinas. Ammon’s simplistic one-liners drove him nuts. Dorothy advised

us not to listen so much to Ammon but to follow his example of personal

responsibility. His anarchism was not really compatible with Catholic

social teaching: too individualistic, not communitarian in the way

Dorothy’s was.

The anarchism that the Catholic Worker has adopted comes from the wider

socialist movement. The word “anarchist” was used by the so-called

scientific socialists (Marx, Engels, and their followers) as a

pejorative term to describe what they called “deviationists”—left-wing

deviationists. But you have people like Peter Kropotkin, Bakunin,

Tolstoy; theirs is the kind of anarchism we are aiming at with a great

emphasis on what’s called “horizontalization.” Authority, wealth, and

power have to be decentralized as much as possible. What is specifically

Christian about the Catholic Worker form of anarchism can be found in

Aquinas, who said positive laws that are not in harmony with the natural

law are not binding for us. Such laws are a species of violence.

In Catholic Worker thinking there is a set of preferences. We would

rather have people in charge of what they are doing. Who is the

authority in the kitchen? The cook. How do you get authority, how do you

exercise it? It isn’t by delegation or majority vote; it’s by good work.

And that authority is exercised as long as it is recognized by equals.

Anarchism of this kind should not be equated with sloppiness or

irresponsibility or chaos. That is not what we’re aiming at. And it is

not what we ordinarily have, although we fall down on occasion. It has

worked out extraordinarily well for us, although it does take time.