💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › richard-greeman-france-at-war.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 13:37:44. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: France at “War”
Author: Richard Greeman
Date: November 17, 2015
Language: en
Topics: france, war, terrorism
Source: http://anarkismo.net/article/28757

Richard Greeman

France at “War”

Dear Friends,

Faced with the shock of the bloody attacks in Paris on Friday the

13^(th), the overall reaction of the French people (and media) was

humane and peaceful, in a spirit of unity and solidarity. Muslim

religious leaders gathered at the Grand Mosque in Paris to denounce the

attacks and disown the jihadist Islamism that inspired them. Citizens

flocked to hospitals to donate blood. They turned to social media to

comfort each other and to debunk wild rumours, with less devisive chat

than after the Charlie attacks. In every city people gathered in central

squares in large, peaceful, silent assemblies in order to mourn

together, to exorcise fear and demonstrate a kind of peace of citizens.

When a group of far-right National Front militants attempted to

politicize a spontaneous gathering of a thousand people in Lille on

Saturday, they were driven off with shouts of “fascists go home!”

On Saturday and Sunday, the radio, TV, and social media frequently

evoked the negative example of George W. Bush’s reaction to the Sept.

11, 2001 attacks: the Patriot Act and the U.S. “global war on terror”

that eventually led to the disintegration of Iraq and the incubation of

today’s Islamic State. The French are proud of having opposed the U.S.

Iraqi invasion in 2003, and hopefully assumed that the Socialist

government of François Hollande would be smart enough to avoid such a

disastrous response to the Nov. 13 attacks. The stakes here are higher,

for in the context of today’s France, such a “war against international

terrorism” would automatically be coupled with a civil war within France

itself between “Muslims” (sic) and “true Frenchmen.”

Such a civil war is not unimaginable. My generation still remembers the

so-called Algerian war of the 50s and 60s, which was actually a civil

war – since at the time Algeria was an integral part of the

“indivisible” French Republic. That long and bloody civil war ended with

De Gaulle overthrowing the Fourth Republic and granting the independence

of Algeria (which sparked another civil war with right-wing

French-Algerian military). Such a chaotic result was precisely the

stated goal the Isis-inspired organizers of Friday’s attack were

seeking. The French weren’t buying it.

Sunday the 15^(th) was a beautiful day all across France, and everywhere

the grieving French people went out of doors to breathe the air and

mingle in cafes, on the squares, and in the automnal sweetness of

nature. They spent the day enjoying their beautiful country, unwinding

from the distress, and affirming their committment to life and

conviviality. The temperature hit a record high for November,

unseasonable flies and mosquitoes were buzzing the crowds of strollers

at the seashore, and people alluded, with a disabused smile, to “global

warming.” The admirable nonchalance of the French, a sunny day of

national defiance of fear. An example of a civilized population.

Sunday evening, returning from our hike, we found our next-door neighbor

Geneviève standing on the landing, haggard, in tears, incoherent (it’s

true that she drinks a bit). Trembling with fear, she was sobbing

“Richard!” “War!” Familiar with Geneviève’s hysterics and totally

oblivious of President Hollande’s bellicose declaration of “war against

barbarism” and France’s nightime bombardment of Raqqa, Syria, we tried

to reason with Geneviève and then, exhausted from hiking, went inside to

sleep in peace.

Monday morning, we woke up to a country “at war.” With martial

solemnity, President Hollande addressed a rare joint session of the

French legistature, declared an open-ended “state of exception,”

promised to fight “without mercy” (!) and, paraphrasing George W. Bush

in 2001, declared war on a “terrorist army” of “barbarians.” With this

policy of “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth,” we’ll all end up

blind and toothless. Poor France! Poor world!

Moreover, while declaring war, the Hollande government has outlawed

anti-war demonstrations and peace assemblies, thus quashing any possible

popular opposition and ending the national dialogue begun over the

weekend. Although the ban was limited to the Paris region and soon to

expire, they are already preparing to prevent mass demontrations and

other outdoor activities during the upcoming climate summit, allowing

the “deciders” to continue to cook the planet in peace. Thus, in the

name of protecting freedom, freedom of assembly has been effectively

abolished in France. In the name of French openness, French society has

been closed. In the name of unity, France has been divided. Not by the

jihadists, not by Le Pen and the racist right, but by the nominally

Socialist government. Why?

On Monday, the Belgian writer and historian David van Reybrouck

published an open letter to the President of the Republic on Médiapart,

which concluded:

Mr. President, you fell right into the trap [laid by Isis] and you fell

with your eyes wide open. You fell into the trap because you feel the

hot breath of hawks like Nicolas Sarkozy and Marine Le Pen breathing

down your neck, and you’ve long had the reputation of a weakling. You

fell into the trap. Elections are being readied in France. They’ll take

place on December 6 and 13. They’re only regional elections, but after

these attacks there’s no question that they will take place under the

sign of national security. You fell into the trap with both feet,

because you pronounced word for word what the terrorist were hoping to

hear from you: a declaration of war. You enthusiastically accepted their

invitation to jihad. But this response, which you wanted to be firm,

runs the monstrous risk of even further accelerating the spiral of

violence.

Van Reybrouk’s analysis is worth reading.[1] Among other things, he

points out that the jihadists described by M. Holland as a “terrorist

army” commanded from the “headquarters” of the Islamic State in Raqqa,

was not very professional. One suicide bomber blew himself up in front

of MacDonalds, killing only one bystander. The group that attacked the

Stadium missed the President and forgot to block the exits. Moreover,

the Isis bulletins taking credit for the attacks were contradictory,

appeared well after the events, and could have been constructed on the

basis of news reports.

Further, Hollande’s spectacular “declaration of war” was somewhat

redundant, as France has been at war with Syria (a former French colony

under a League of Nations mandate) since 2011 with several air strikes

since September. Curiously, unlike in the U.S., the French media never

report these military actions, which are also being carried out in Iraq

along side of U.S. forces. Nor does the French Army post communiqués on

its site. The place to find them is Wikipedia. One could add that Raqqa

is a city of 200,000 civilians, that Isis moves its “headquarters” every

few days, and that hundreds of Syrian civilians in schools and clinics

were killed by the French reprisal attacks. Don’t Arab lives matter?

There are about ten million Arabs living in France today. The European

French media refer to them systematically as “Muslims,” which they are

nominally, although not that many pray five times a day or go to the

mosque on Friday.[2] So as Arabs and “Moslems,” French people of North

African origin are subject to both racial and religious prejudices and

tend to be excluded from mainstream French society. Unemployment is

high, and most Arabs grow up in massive anonymous housing projects on

the outskirts of Paris and other cities, the banlieues, where there are

no banks, public services, or even supermarkets. In 2005, these ghettos

erupted in rioting after police caused the death of the fleeing

teenagers.[3] Almost all the jihadists of Friday the 13^(th) were French

Arabs who grew up in these desperate ghettos, felt excluded, turned to

“crime,” converted to Islam in prison, and then went off to fight in

Syria before filtering back into France and carrying out their suicide

attacks. If the French Republic, instead of moving to include its Arab

minority, provokes a racial/religious war with them, homegrown jihadist

cells like last Friday’s crews would rise up by the hundreds and the

nightmare vision of an endless racial/religious civil war in this

beautiful, peaceful country would come true.

This nightmare is Isis’ vision, and the danger today is that the

Hollande government – by playing with fire – will breath life into it.

Until now, President Hollande has been seen as a hack center-left

politician whose lack of charisma was pitiful. Apparently, he has seized

on this crisis to play the great war leader in the hope of

outmanoeuriving the far-right National Front and getting re-elected in

2017. It won’t get him re-elected, of course. The French people are too

wise to fall for the posturing of a cynical politician pretending to be

a De Gaulle. But that is hardly the matter. People are dying under

French bombs in Syria, and those chickens are bound to come home to

roost in the banlieues of France.

One can only hope that unity in diversity, the intelligence and the

courage manifested during these tragic days by the real France profonde,

will survive the Hollande government’s suspension of basic freedoms and

its devisive, provocative rhetoric designed to build up patriotic fever

and silence critics. Discussions about peace are already beginning to

take place in associations and on line. The real debate about war,

peace, and the exclusion of France’s Arab population will continue. This

is a tragic time here in France. Only time will tell the outcome.

Yours in Solidarity,

Richard Greeman

[1] http://blogs.mediapart.fr/edition/les-invites-de-mediapart/article/151115/monsieur-le-president-vous-etes-tombe-dans-le-piege

[2] By comparison, no one calls the white European French

“‘Christians.”’

[3] Sarkozy, who was then Minister of the Interior (Security) insulted

the rioters “‘scum’” and then officials invited conservative Moslem

immams to help restore order in the projects.