đŸ’Ÿ Archived View for library.inu.red â€ș file â€ș prairie-struggle-dispatch-from-ecuador.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 13:29:57. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

âžĄïž Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Dispatch from Ecuador
Author: Prairie Struggle
Date: 2014
Language: en
Topics: Ecuador, reportback
Source: Retrieved on July 8, 2014 from https://web.archive.org/web/20140708223521/http://www.prairiestruggle.org/news/dispatch-ecuador-prairie-struggle-members-reporting

Prairie Struggle

Dispatch from Ecuador

I have been living in the Andean mountains of Ecuador for about eight

months. I live just outside the city of Azogues, about twenty minutes

away from the city of Cuenca, which is an incredibly metropolitan city

of about half a million people. I have also had the privilege of

travelling the country, to the ocean city of Salinas, to Guayaquil (the

largest city in Ecuador and center of business), to Quito (the capital

of Ecuador), and many places in between. I think I was unprepared for

how beautiful a mega-biodiverse country as small as Ecuador truly is. I

also tried to arrive in this country with as few preconceived notions as

possible, while at the same time researching as much as I could before

arriving. The purpose of this article is not to crap on Ecuador, a

country I have come to love, nor to purvey that I speak for the people

of Ecuador, because that’s not the case either. I want to dispel the

idea that political leftism is more prominent here in South America than

in the North.

Of course, president Rafael Correa does belong to an alliance in South

America of ‘leftist leaders’, but after living here for almost a year,

I’m just not sure what that means – aside from the rhetoric used to piss

off the United States in particular. Now, to be sure, immense progress

has been made in Ecuador in a relatively short period of time. If you

want to give yourself nightmares for a month, Google “Ecuador and

Chevron” to see how this oil company nearly destroyed a country, not to

mention one of the most important rainforests in the world. About 20

years ago, people were still leaving Ecuador in droves, culminating in

the currency being so devalued that Ecuador switched to the U.S. dollar.

My partner, a citizen of Ecuador, remembers a large piece of

tear-inducing graffiti in the central plaza of our city, reading “last

person to leave, please turn out the lights”. This has changed

immensely. Infrastructure has improved by leaps and bounds, creating a

lot of jobs. For example, from our location it used to take fifteen to

eighteen hours to drive to the capital of Quito; it now takes only six

to eight hours. The abject poverty that was a reality for so many, has

also improved drastically. The road stops that were manned by either

corrupt police looking for bribes, or just straight-up thieves in

uniforms, are now abandoned. Many of these changes are a result of

president Correa’s policies.

However, one need only to travel outside the areas of tourism and U.N.

World Heritage Sites to see how the working poor still suffer. As with

the rest of the world, these improvements have widened the gap between

the wealthy and the working class. In Guayaquil, the center of business

in Ecuador, the poverty is stark and in your face no matter which part

of the city you are in. In the capital of Quito, the disparity between

the classes is marked by disturbing differences. Once you leave the

areas marked by the glittering temples of consumerism, government, and

tourism you will see that the roads in the neighbourhoods of the poor

are not even paved. Will this change as improvements continue? Only time

will tell; certainly many of the statements made by Correa are

encouraging. He speaks often and specifically of ending discrimination

against the marginalized communities of Ecuador; of being firmly against

American imperialism; of protecting the environment; and improving the

lives of all the citizens of Ecuador.

It’s just that a lot of Correa’s recent actions are so damn scary. When

I say recent, I’m talking in my time living here. It’s incredibly

difficult to take the good stuff seriously when the president’s actions

are so bizarrely the opposite. Let’s look at a couple of examples of

what is happening in Ecuador under president Correa, and see if we can’t

infuse some reality into the preconceived notions of institutionalized

leftism we in the North seem to hold about the South.

“PIMP MY RAINFOREST” (A.R.)

In 2007, president Correa went before the General Assembly of the United

Nations and announced that he had taken the Yasuni portion of the Amazon

rainforest hostage. I stand against capitalism and for the environment,

he seemed to say... but pay up or we start choppin’ limbs! Tree limbs,

that is


Dubbed the YasunĂ­-ITT Initiative, Correa said that in exchange for half

the value of the oil under this portion of the Amazon, he would leave it

untouched, halting all plans to drill for the crude beneath. In perhaps

the most expensive hostage taking of all time, he gave the rest of the

world six years to ‘donate’ $3.6 billion to save the rainforest. Correa

made this announcement with all the altruistic pomp he could muster,

speaking persuasively about saving the culture of isolated Indigenous

tribes, preventing insane levels of CO2 from being released, not to

mention that it’s just straight up repugnant (for lack of a better

phrase) to picture an oil slick running through the pristine Amazon.

However, this deadline has come and gone, putting Ecuador in a seriously

tough position because the country really, really needs the money from

extracting this oil.

I’d like to be very clear about the vital importance and unique nature

of Yusani National Park. This part of the Amazon is one of the most

biologically diverse areas on earth. Scientists have discovered 655

species of trees in one hectare of land in the park, more than the total

recorded in the U.S and Canada combined. It has been declared a world

biosphere reserve by UNESCO. Some 4,000 plant species, 173 species of

mammals, and 610 bird species live inside the Park. It contains more

documented insect species than any other forest in the world, and is

among the most diverse forests in the world for different species of

birds, bats, amphibians, epiphytes, and lianas. Yasuni is a critical

habitat for 23 globally threatened mammal species, including the giant

otter, the Amazonian manatee, pink river dolphin, giant anteater, and

Amazonian tapir... Ten primate species live in the Yasuni, including the

threatened white-bellied spider monkey. (Wikipedia, UNESCO, Journal

Nature) But back to the hostage taking.

Anarchist groups like Prairie Struggle incorporate environmental

concerns into their campaigns and platforms not only to protect the

global commons, but also because these issues are always part of the

struggle against capitalism and the commodification of our environment.

This figures particularly into Correa’s treatment of oil extraction in

the Amazon region of Yusani, for Ecuador needs the money anticipated

from the hostage taking to pay back considerable loans from China. When

the international community paid only about $100 million of the demanded

ransom, Correa scrapped the YasunĂ­-ITT Initiative on August 15^(th) of

this year. Some drilling has already commenced, predictably leading to

the same old language (utilized by Correa in an act of supreme irony

given his original speech to the U.N.) of colonization of Indigenous

tribes, not to mention over-hunting and deforestation.

Oh yes, Correa’s a real socialist enemy of the state, huh?

ANARCHISTS ARE THE ENEMY

I would like to metaphorically introduce you to a cool dude named Jaime

Guevara. He is an active, very well known anarchist and musician (the

two often overlap) based out of Quito, Ecuador. After Guevara gave what

Correa interpreted to be an ‘obscene gesture’ on August 31^(st) of this

year, the president of Ecuador declared him an alcoholic and drug addict

that was not to be trusted. Correa began a swift smear campaign again

this known anarchist that did not go well. You see, what Correa

ignorantly assumed were the effects of alcohol and drugs, were actually

the effects of the medications that Guevara takes for his epilepsy.

As soon as people who know Guevara started jumping to his defense,

clarifying that he has a neurological disorder, not to mention that he

never drinks or does drugs both out of personal choice as well as

needing to take medications that make it dangerous to consume either,

you’d think that Correa would simply have apologized and the two men

would have returned to their respective corners of our antiquated

political spectrum. But the president’s first response was quite

preposterous. “How are we to know the brat has a neurological problem?”,

Correa said. No apology would ever come. Of course, there was widespread

support for Guevara, some of which, ironically, would not have come if

not for Correa’s actions. And it got worse
 much worse. As if to counter

the support that Guevara was receiving, Correa continued his misguided

smear campaign. The president clarified in response to the backlash that

Guevara was a spoiled liar, is a dangerous anarchist with left-leaning

militancy, and that his disease causes him to be violently aggressive

especially against those who disagree with his views.

Correa, who often touts his dedication to eradicate discrimination in

Ecuador, essentially vilified all those suffering from epilepsy, which

is pretty damn low. Also interesting is that Correa has enacted a law in

Ecuador that states that journalists who lie in their publications can

be prosecuted and be sent to jail. Most recently, this law has been

extended to social media in Ecuador, including Facebook and Twitter. But

what of Correa lying in the media? While I doubt that there exists a

government in the world that is a big fan of the anarchists seeking to

topple their system, Correa’s actions increasingly (and disturbingly)

reflect the type of bubble he rules from. Watch out if you don’t agree

with the president, as there will be consequences. Oh, and it’s well

worth noting that Guevara is opposed to the exploitation of the Yasuni

National Park and has been actively engaged in the organizing against

this government action.

Many that consider themselves part of the institutionalized left in

North America look to South America as a political haven of 21^(st)

century socialism; but what makes the president of Ecuador any better

than the president of America? We are anarcho-communists, and a

government is a government is a government. None are better than the

other under capitalism, though some can surely be worse. Just as in most

of the world, in Ecuador the environment is still exploited (despite the

fact that the environment is constitutionally protected), and anarchists

are still vilified. These are merely two examples demonstrating how our

current system really makes one country no better than another.

What unites us is that the working class is universally exploited by the

few that hold the power, sometimes more violently, sometimes more

latently. Let us not be divided, nor misled, by the borders we seek to

abolish.

By Stacey and Michael (Regina Branch)