đŸ Archived View for library.inu.red âș file âș kevin-doyle-bombs-are-no-solution.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 11:50:23. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
âĄïž Next capture (2024-06-20)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Bombs are no solution Author: Kevin Doyle Date: 1996 Language: en Topics: Irish Republican Army, peacebuilding, Ireland, United Kingdom, Workers Solidarity Source: Retrieved on 7th December 2021 from http://struggle.ws/ws/norwar48.html Notes: Published in Workers Solidarity No. 48 â Summer 1996.
Finally, it happened. Three bombs in London in February, that killed
three people, put an end to what had been an 18 month long cease-fire.
As we go to press, it is still far from certain as to what will happen
in the coming months but the prospects now may well be for a full scale
return to the âarmed struggleâ by the IRA. With this, undoubtedly, will
come renewed sectarian attacks and violence in the North. It is a
prospect that no one will welcome, least of all those living in the
Northern Ireland.
The Peace Process was on shaky ground for quite a while, but
particularly so in the last six months. The constant âroad-blockingâ
efforts of John Major and the British government inevitably caused
strife. Throughout the last eighteen months they have placed obstacle
after obstacle in front of every attempt to have a meaningful dialogue
about the future of Northern Ireland.
Issues relating to ongoing discrimination and sectarianism in the North,
and its political institutions â a central source of antagonism for the
large Nationalist population â never saw the light of day. Instead,
everything got bogged down on issues relating to âarms decommissioningâ
(and this didnât include the guns of the British Army!).
Even when a comprise was finally reached on this issue â the Mitchell
Principles â Major again destroyed any hope for dialogue with his ânewâ
proposals for âelections before talksâ. It was a performance that
inevitably led to disaster and John Major stands fully to blame. At no
time did he show any inclination to shift from his traditional stance of
shoring up Unionist and Loyalist privilege in the North.
In many respects anarchists can be forgiven for saying, âWe told you soâ
A process that relied so heavily on the British and Irish governments
was inevitably flawed. Were we to believe that either government would
move in any substantial way towards bringing about meaningful change?
Letâs face it: this was always highly unlikely.
Both governments have far more in common than divides them, and this is
not just in terms of economic polices. As much as anything else, both
governments have assisted and presided over the existence of the
Northern Ireland statelet for over 70 years, a statelet that has always
been based on discrimination against one section of the community.
Neither government has ever made any significant efforts to end the
discrimination that is the basis of the Northern State. The British
government, in particular, has actively assisted in propping it up.
In fact, it was mass struggle and huge demonstrations by ordinary people
(the Civil Rights Movement) that forced the first real compromises from
the Unionist ascendancy in Northern Ireland. It was these efforts and
not those of either the British or Irish governments that brought the
first flowers of hope.
Sinn FĂ©in seem to have forgotten this. Or have they? Of course those
privileges are minuscule compared to the division between the ruling
class and the working class. Major put the maintenance of these
privileges, in return for unionist support in the House of Commons ahead
of a chance of peace.
In many respects Sinn FĂ©inâs performance during this Peace Process has
been an eye opener. Its strategy from the very beginning has been a
nationalist one: the formation of the so-called Pan-Nationalist Front.
Throughout the last number of years they have moderated their politics,
in favour of an alliance between the main nationalist forces on this
island: the Irish Government, the SDLP (in the North) and themselves,
Sinn FĂ©in.
But, it has been an sorry strategy and it has led Sinn FĂ©in into
defending some of the strangest and most worthless of things. To give
but one example, in 1994, when the Irish Government fell (following the
Fr. Brendan Smyth child sex abuse scandal) Sinn FĂ©in, almost alone among
political parties in the South, was calling for support for this
Labour-Fianna FĂĄil government. This was at a time when the government
was totally discredited. Strange politics indeed.
But the problems do not end there. The Peace Process never, at any time,
addressed the huge problems that face so many people in Ireland today â
both north and south of the border. Unemployment is now at record
levels, as are the levels of poverty and inequality. This disastrous
situation is one that has been created and âpresided overâ by many of
those central to the Peace Process, including, of course, the Irish and
British governments. In this regard, they have never been offering
anything else, throughout the last 18 months, other than more of the
same.
Sinn FĂ©in stands indicted for falling in so readily and easily with
politicians who have punished working class people again and again. Sinn
FĂ©inâs performance has raised real question marks about their claims to
represent an âalternative Ireland.â â$1000-a-plateâ fund-raising dinners
say a lot, after all.
Very few people will welcome the return of the IRAâs strategy of the
âarmed struggleâ. It is a strategy that is deeply flawed and a dead-end
to all intents and purposes. It fails, even when it is at its most
dramatic, to lay any basis for working class unity in Ireland, let alone
within the North. In fact, more often than not it creates the opposite
effect.
It builds tension, leads to increased State power (and the use of
Emergency and repressive legislation) and it shores up âtraditional
loyaltiesâ Sectarianism will never end when the strategy being used to
bring about a British withdrawal is primarily that of the âarmed
struggleâ. At its very best it will only lead us back to the very place
that weâve been for the last 18 months: cosy wheeling and dealing with
the Clintons, Majors and Brutons of this world. What a prospect!
Over the last 25 years, Sinn FĂ©in and the IRA have demanded the
leadership of the struggle to bring change in Ireland. But their failure
during this peace process, and their failure at the end of it to offer
anything other than a return to the âarmed struggleâ stands as a major
indictment. Sinn FĂ©in are nationalists first, and because of this they
can never offer anything to those who do not share their âIrishness.â
These are not viable politics, not in todayâs Ireland.
But, just as bad, they have shown themselves to be elitist and
âtraditionalâ in their operations during the last 18 months. They have
tried â very hard it must be added â to play âthe game of politicsâ.
They have walked the âcorridors of powerâ but they have created no real
mass-struggle alternative to it; that is why they have no strategy now.
They are floundering. All they can offer is a return to the âarmed
struggleâ â a policy that is certain to fail.
As anarchists, we remain convinced that real change is possible. The
recent strikes in France confirm once again that the power of the
working-class in Europe is far from finished. Workers have much in
common. Often that commonalty spreads beyond the borders of any country
or the colour of anyoneâs skin. We believe that this is the way forward.
The âpeace processâ failed because it was conducted in the traditional
elitist âmen in suits behind closed doors way â trying to sort out our
problems.
The chance for change remains because it will only come though mass
mobilisation. Indeed it was the huge struggle of ordinary people in the
Civil Rights movement that last won something progressive in the North.
Imperialism remains as the great obstacle to progressive change in the
North as it continues to fuel hatreds and successfully helps to divide
and rule the people.
Northern Ireland is still the poorest area of Britain to live in. What
is there worth fighting for ? It is now more imperative than ever to
built solidarity in our class around this issues that we face as
workers: double-taxation, low pay, worsening job security and sex
discrimination. Admittedly, this is not a short term strategy. But then
where did 25 years of the armed struggle get us?
Why not start on the right road now?