💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › freedom-press-prison-life.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 10:20:06. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Prison Life
Author: Freedom Press, Anonymous
Date: August, 1887
Language: en
Topics: Freedom Press, Freedom: A Journal of Anarchist Socialism
Source: Freedom: A Journal of Anarchist Socialism, Vol. 1, No. 11, online source http://www.revoltlib.com/?id=3097, retrieved on May 1, 2020.
Notes: Freedom Press, London

Freedom Press, Anonymous

Prison Life

[SECOND NOTICE.]

Are Prisons Necessary? is the title of the concluding chapter of

Kropotkin's account of his prison experiences. "Unhappily, hitherto," he

goes on to remark, "our penal institutions have been nothing but a

compromise between the old ideas of revenge, of punishment of the 'bad

will' and 'sin,' and the modern ideas of 'deterring from crime,' both

softened to a very slight extent by some notions of philanthropy." But

is it not time that we fully recognized the fact that crime, like bodily

disease, is capable of scientific investigation, and of that scientific

treatment which considers prevention the best of cures?

An energetic school of scientific students of crime has sprung up of

late years in Italy and Germany, who have devoted themselves to

searching out the main causes of this painful phenomenon. They have

concluded that there are three groups of such principal causes: the

cosmic, the anthropological, and the social. All these causes, and

especially the first, have as yet been but very imperfectly investigated

; nevertheless, some very interesting facts have been conclusively

established.

Cosmic influence, that is roughly speaking, the state of the weather,

has been shown to have a strong and definitely ascertainable effect upon

human action. To take one instance; an English writer (S. A. Hill, I

-Nature,' Vol. XXIX., 1881, p. 338) has pointed out that in India crimes

of violence correspond in frequency to the amount of moist heat in the

atmosphere. The Italian Professor E. Ferri has collected statistics of

temperature and of the prevalence of "crime against the person," which

show the most striking correspondences.

The anthropological, the distinctively human and individual causes of

crime are still more important. Dr. Loinbroso and his Italian colleagues

have put together many valuable observations on the physical

characteristics of criminals. They have shown that the majority of

prisoners have some defect of brain organization ; that the most brutal

murders have usually been committed by men afflicted with some serious

physical imperfection ; that most criminals have singularly long arms

(suggestive of nearness to the monkey), etc., etc. Researches in

interesting relation with the investigations of our English Dr.

Maudsley, into what he calls the wide "borderland between crime and

insanity."

A crime is rarely due to something which has suddenly sprung up in the

criminal. "Take for instance," says Kropotkin, "a man who has committed

an act of violence. . . . Before this time, probably, throughout his

life, the same person has often manifested some anomaly of mind by noisy

expression of his feelings, by crying loudly after some trifling

disagreeable circumstance, by easily venting his bad temper on those who

stood by him; and, unhappily, he has not from his childhood found

anybody who was able to give a better direction to his nervous

impressibility. . . . And if we push our analysis still deeper, we

discover that this state of mind is itself a consequence of some

physical disease, either inherited or developed by an abnormal life."

" . . . More than that. If we analyze ourselves, if everybody would

frankly acknowledge the thoughts which have sometimes passed through his

mind, we should see that all of us have had some feelings and thoughts

such as constitute the motive of all acts considered as criminal. We

have repudiated them at once; but if they have had the opportunity of

recurring again and again; if they were nurtured by circumstances or by

a want of exercise of the best passions–love, compassion, and all those

which result from living in the joys and sufferings of those who

surround us; then these passing influences, so brief that we hardly

noticed them, would have degenerated into some morbid element in our

character."

"Fraternal treatment to check the development of the anti-social

feelings which grow up in some of us–not imprisonment–is the only means

that we are authorized in applying, and can apply, with some effect to

those in whom these feelings have developed in consequence of bodily

disease or social influences." A remarkable instance of the healthy

influence of fostering the self-respect and kindly feelings of criminals

is given by Dr. Cameron. Speaking of his 30 years of experience as a

prison surgeon, he says that by treating the convicts "with as much

consideration as if they bad been delicate ladies, the greatest order

was generally maintained in the hospital." He was struck with "that

estimable trait in the character of prisoners–observable even among the

roughest criminals–I mean the great attention they bestow on the sick."

These convict attendants are just those prisoners who have an

opportunity of exercising their good feelings, and who enjoy the most

freedom. "The most hardened criminals," Dr. Cameron adds, "are not

exempt from this feeling" of kindly compassion.

The moral necessity for the adoption of a humane and brotherly method of

treating criminals appears the stronger when we turn to consider the

social causes of crime. "The feeling is growing among us that society is

responsible for the anti-social deeds committed in its midst. . . ."

From year to year thousands of children grow up in the filth–material

and moral–of our great cities. The "father and mother leave the den they

inhabit early in the morning in search of any job which may help them to

get through the next week." The children enter life without even knowing

a handicraft."

"I never cease to wonder," adds Kropotkin, "at the deep rootedness of

social feelings in the humanity of the nineteenth century, at the

goodness of heart which still prevails in the dirty streets."

1'In Russian and French Prisons.' By P. Kropotkin. Ward and Downey.

This social morality of the wretched is still more remarkable when we

remember not only the continual flaunting display of the luxury and

license of the rich, but that "everything we see around us–the shops,

the peoples we see in the street, the literature we read, the

money-worship we meet with every day–tends to develop an insatiable

thirst for unlimited wealth," and an impression that the beauideal of

life is to make others work for us and to live in idleness.

About two-thirds of the actual breaches of the law, are so-called crimes

against property." And it is obvious that these will disappear with the

removal of the social injustice which is their cause.

"As to 'crimes against persons,' already their numbers are rapidly

decreasing, owing to the growth of moral and social habits which

necessarily develop in each society, and can only grow when common

interests contribute more and more to tighten the bonds which induce men

to live a common life." "We live now too much in isolation. Everybody

cares only for himself, or his nearest relatives. Egotistical–i.e.,

unintelligent–individualism in material life has necessarily brought

about an individualism as egotistic and harmful in the mutual relations

of human beings." " But men cannot live in this isolation, and the

elements of new social groups–those ties arising between the inhabitants

of the same spot having many interests in common, and those of people

united by the prosecution of common aims–is growing." And where there is

common life there is mutual moral as well as material support,

influences calculated to draw forth the kindly feelings and counteract

those morbid tendencies, which, if unchecked by the growth of better

things, finally corrupt the mind. Where the bonds of common life are

Strong, as in the Chinese compound family or Swiss or Slavonian.

communes, we see its beneficial effects in the low level of crime. We

may expect the like results from the new developments of social life now

springing up around us. "Yet notwithstanding all this, there surely will

remain a limited number of persons whose anti-social passions–the

results of bodily disease–may still be a danger to the community."

Such men and women can only be treated as modern science and humanity

are teaching us to treat the lunatic and idiot. We have ceased to whip

and chain the madman, we are ceasing to lock him up in the mitigated

imprisonment of an asylum. The plan tried by the kind-hearted and brave

peasants of Gheel, in Belgium, of taking the insane into their houses as

members of the family has lately found warm advocates among medical men

elsewhere, notably Dr. Arthur Mitchell in Scotland, where the practice

of receiving lunatics in private families is rapidly gaining ground with

markedly beneficial results.

It is by such self-devoted and compassionate fellowship, not by

imprisonment, that we can hope to redeem the afflicted and erring among

our brethren." All that tends that way," concludes Kropotkin, "will

bring us nearer to the solution of the great question which has not

ceased to preoccupy human societies since the remotest antiquity, and

which cannot be solved by prisons."