💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › freedom-press-london-notes-jun-1888.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 10:19:13. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Notes [Jun, 1888] Author: Freedom Press (London) Date: June, 1888 Language: en Source: Freedom: A Journal of Anarchist Socialism, Vol. 2, No. 21, online source http://www.revoltlib.com/?id=3069, retrieved on April 14, 2020.
Last month a million slaves obtained their liberty in Brazil. The
newspapers were filled. with touching descriptions of the joy of the
aged emperor in thus beholding upon his death-bed the peaceful results
of a wise series of preparatory measures. Here was, indeed, an example
of an enormous social change brought about in accordance with the
principles of law and order. What an encouraging example for European
parliamentarian Socialists!
Turning, however, to Number 33 of La Révolte we find an extract from the
Porvenir, a Portuguese Socialist paper, written before the official
announcement of the emancipation, which throws a somewhat new light on
the matter, a light carefully obscured by the bourgeois journals. The
extract runs as follows:
"At Grajahu, in the Maranhao, the authorities have been obliged to flee
before the revolted slaves. At the Barra Mensa the director of the
plantation has been lynched. Campos also is in a state of revolution.
The detachment of police has been reinforced by troops from Nictheroy.
At Ubatuba the blacks and the policemen had an open fight and the
"representatives of order" got the worst of it. At Ouro Preto mutinous
slaves surrounded the houses of the 'Liberals' and besieged them. The
police deputy has fled. Flying companies (of troops) hold the country
but dare not measure forces with the bands of fugitive blacks." A state
of things that reminds some of us of the state of things in Russia which
preceded the free gift of emancipation from the Great White Czar to his
faithful peasants. So true is it, "Who would be free, himself must
strike the blow."
The Brazilian slaves base forced their way out of the frying-pan only to
find themselves in the fire. Their masters who supported them as beasts
of burden at an expenditure of £45 each per annum, will now, according
to the Pall Malt Gazette, as employers paying competition wages, leave
them to support themselves as free men on £20 a-year. Well, personal
liberty is worth the winning even at the cost of semi-starvation. It is
the necessary first step towards the true freedom of Communist
Anarchism.
The Jewish refugee who explained before the aristocrats of the Sweating
Commission that he preferred to work 17 hours a day in London instead of
13 hours in Russia, because in London he had more freedom, spoke like a
true man. But when will the victims of private property learn that they
have but a miserable fragment of freedom after all? Why should a man
toil either 13 or 17 hours a day for a master, or rather a series of
masters, each of whom appropriates a slice out of the produce of the
worker's labor, so that after all only a wretched pittance remains for
himself, when lie might work only five or six hours and amply supply his
needs, if he had free use of the means of production and no idle
monopolists to support? Is a man truly free who is the slave of an
unnecessary and removable economic system, upheld by an immoral and
destructable law?
Louise Michel's humane attitude towards her would-be assassin has
produced its natural effects. Pierre Lucas is deeply penitent for his
mad outrage and lie has been acquitted at the Rouen assizes amid the
enthusiastic applause of the people. The idea of the justice of the
punishment of criminals by society has received a sharper check by this
one true-hearted action than by years of preaching.