💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › freedom-press-london-notes-jun-1887.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 10:19:11. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Notes [Jun, 1887]
Author: Freedom Press (London)
Date: June, 1887
Language: en
Source: Freedom: A Journal of Anarchist Socialism, Vol. 1, No. 9, online source http://www.revoltlib.com/?id=3068, retrieved on April 14, 2020.

Freedom Press (London)

Notes [Jun, 1887]

Fifty years more of dust-licking before an out-worn, meaningless

superstition, and we are to make our continued want of energy and common

sense an occasion of national rejoicing! National self-abasement for our

folly would be more to the point.

* * *

What possible meaning has all this cant about loyalty to the poor old

German, who for fifty years has allowed herself to wear the cap and

bells as Queen of England? Truly our civilization, from the British

Constitution to the women's dress improvers, has grown into such

monstrous shapes that it is hard to discover its relation to the reason

of mankind.

* * *

When the sovereign of England was a great military leader, like the

First and Third Edwards, or the center of a national idea like

Elizabeth, there was some meaning, though there might be little wisdom,

in talking of loyalty. But Victoria is simply the most scandalous

sinecurist in the land, and yet the workers are badgered or wheedled out

of their pence by primrose dames and the like empty headed

sentimentalists, to show their loyalty by making her a further present

of money. For 68 years they have supported her in luxury, what has she

done for them in return?

* * *

Before another fifty years are over and gone the workers of the whole

civilized world will be asking some such question in right good earnest;

asking it with a determination to get an answer that will set it at rest

for ever; asking it not of kings and queens alone, but of ruling men and

ruling classes of every sort and condition.

* * *

In the little divertissement in Irish affairs lately caused by the

Times, the Irish actors in the comedy at St. Stephens would have played

a better part if they had allowed the mud thrown at them to dry and drop

off, and a better part still if they had boldly avowed their willingness

to be associated in name with the extremists of their party.

* * *

If but for one thing, the present system of legislation should be

condemned to die the death, and that is for the way in which it makes

rogues of those who might be honest men enough. Among the so-called

representatives of the people, who is there who is not eating his own

words, or stifling the feeble aspirations after freedom and justice of

which he was delivered on election platforms?

* * *

What an awkward position that was at St. Austell for a sometime "friend

of the poor and champion of economy," to be publicly confronted by the

question," Is it true that you refused to accept the office of Secretary

to the Local Board until the salary had been raised from £1,200 to

£1,500?"

* * *

The question remained unanswered; and yet it seems the extra £300 had

been demanded only because it was feared the lesser sum would be

regarded by the agricultural laborers as a slight put upon their special

representative! This delicacy of feeling has no doubt been much

appreciated. It is possible, however, that the agricultural and all

other tax-burdened laborers, may come to contemplate the cropping of

their tribunes' salaries with a philosophic calm.