💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › freedom-press-london-notes-aug-1888.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 10:18:57. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Notes [Aug, 1888]
Author: Freedom Press (London)
Date: August, 1888
Language: en
Source: Freedom: A Journal of Anarchist Socialism, Vol. 2, No. 23, online source http://www.revoltlib.com/?id=3061, retrieved on April 14, 2020.

Freedom Press (London)

Notes [Aug, 1888]

In spite of the ever-present financial difficulties of social rebels,

the Anarchist press shows most encouraging vitality. Now and again a

paper disappears, but two or three others are continually springing up

in its place. This month we publish a list of the Socialist Anarchist

papers in Spanish to supplement the Italian list given in our June

number. In America during the last few months the German Libertus and

Fair Play have respectively sprung from the Mutualist journals Liberty

and Lucifer. The Alarm which was forced to suspend publication as a

fortnightly at Chicago, has reappeared as a weekly at New York, and is

yet more revolutionary in tone. It supplies a special need in the party

by freely opening its columns for the statement of various shades of

Anarchist opinion and the discussion of disputed points. At present an

interesting debate is going forward on the use of forge.

Our Dutch comrades have now an organ in their native tongue, the

Anarchist. In France, the brave little Idee Ouvriere at Havre, for which

Louise Michel had been lecturing when she was shot, has been obliged to

relinquish the struggle for existence, but the Paris, Anarchist groups

have brought out their Ca Ira (That will go) and a new French

fortnightly, La Critique Sociale, is published at Geneva. So goes the

fight. When wearied hands drop the banner, fresh volunteers rush forward

to bear it aloft, and slowly but steadily the new thought forges its way

through the opposing ranks of interest and prejudice.

We are glad to see that revolutionary Communism is making its way among

our Australian comrades. According to the report in the Australian

Radical of the debate of the Melbourne Anarchist Club on June 3rd, only

Comrade Andrade opposed the idea of expropriation, whilst the opener, F.

P. Upham, "stood up squarely for Anarchist Communism." The advanced

political thinkers of Melbourne and the advanced economic thinkers of

Sydney seem to be mutually influencing one another, the Socialists

advancing towards Anarchism and the Anarchists toward Communism, much as

happens in the European International Working Men's Association.

By the way, why do our comrades associate Communist-Anarchism with

individual names? It is not an idea confined to any one man, but for the

last twenty years has been the faith of the majority of Socialists in

the south of Europe and of the left wing of the Socialist party

throughout the world. It is simply the most advanced expression of the

great popular movement of our century, and finds an echo wherever the

revolt against economic, political and moral domination has begun to

deeply stir the minds of men.

On the Portsmouth Road, close of the Hind Head, there have been for the

last ten or twelve years forty acres of land surrounded by a costly and

vicious-looking iron fence behind which, at no great distance apart,

stand tall notice boards bearing the following inscription: "Notice.

Trespassers will be prosecuted according to law. By order. A. J.

Balfour, Esq., M.P." The enclosure with its profusion of brambles and

weeds suggest a picture in miniature of Ireland after "twenty years of

resolute government." When Mr. Balfour has pacified Hibernia he will no

doubt turn his attention to this little plot which Time has converted

into a veritable Tom Tidler's ground The crop of gold and silver which

is to be reaped when the warning, to trespassers have been replaced by

tempting advertisements of building-lots may be calculated to a nicety.

Forty acres at £200 per acre = £8000. Not a bad profit on the original

investment of £10 per acre, and a beautiful example of unearned

increment.