💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › dave-roediger-haymarket-incident.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 09:16:42. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Haymarket Incident
Author: Dave Roediger
Date: 1992
Language: en
Topics: Haymarket
Source: Retrieved on August 11, 2016 from https://web.archive.org/web/20160811055716/http://flag.blackened.net/lpp/haymarket/roediger_haymarket.html
Notes: Published in Buhle, Mari Jo, Buhle, Paul, Georgakas, Dan, eds., Ecyclopedia of the American Left, University of Illinois Press, Chicago, 1992

Dave Roediger

Haymarket Incident

On May 4, 1886, a bomb was thrown as local police attacked an

anarchist-led labor demonstration in Chicago’s Haymarket Square. Eight

policemen died as a result of the bombing and of crossfire among police.

An undetermined, but probably larger, number of demonstrators lost their

lives amidst the tumult and police gunfire. The identity of the

bomb-thrower remains a mystery, but the events leading up to Haymarket,

and the tremendous repercussions of the bombing, are more clear.

The Haymarket Square demonstration grew out of a massive nationwide

movement of working people demanding the eight-hour working day. That

demand had begun to attract support during the Civil War as workers

identified their long hours as a kind of “slavery” from which they could

be “emancipated” by legislation. After the war, EightHour Leagues boomed

in membership and successfully lobbied for eight-hour laws in several

states. But these laws almost all featured gaping loopholes. In

Illinois, Chicago Eight-Hour Leagues were instrumental in securing the

passage of a shorter-hours law in 1867, albeit an unenforceable one. On

May I of that year, tens of thousands of Chicago workers attempted to

make the statute apply by striking. Their actions failed, largely as a

result of police violence, but the episode in that booming industrial

city presented in microcosm trends that would mature in the next twenty

years and lead toward Haymarket.

By the early 1880s, radical workers in Chicago and elsewhere had

accumulated further grievances against the political system, especially

in the bloody suppression of the 1877 railroad strike and in subsequent

local elections in which socialist candidates charged that fraud had

“counted them out” of victory. Three separate national organizational

responses resulted, all of them seeking to reconcile republican

citizenship with industrial society and to address the question of how

the labor movement should interact with a government hostile to labor

action. The oldest of these organizations, the Knights of Labor (founded

1869), preached the virtues of cooperatives, of working-class self

-education, of agitation for political reform, of cultivation of good

relations with local politicians, of organization of both skilled and

unskilled workers, and of caution in undertaking strikes. IrishAmerican

workers strongly supported the Knights of Chicago. The Federation of

Organized Trades and Labor Unions (founded 1881, evolved into the

American Federation of Labor in 1886) stressed trade union organizing

and sought to avoid politically divisive issues and reliance on the

state in labor-reform matters. The smallest organization, the

International Working People’s Association (founded 1881) mixed

anarchism, socialism, and syndicalism. The IWPA utterly rejected both

politics and reform while embracing revolutionary self-defense and

writing romantically about the possibility of dynamite as a too] for

labor militants. It attracted substantial support among German, Czech,

and Scandinavian immigrants. Its Chicago branch, led by Albert Parsons,

Lucy Parsons, and August Spies, emphasized the role of industrial unions

and farm organizations in providing the basis for a new and stateless

society.

Lines dividing these various approaches to labor organization were

extremely fluid, with many activists easily switching organizational

affiliations or even belonging to different groups simultaneously. In

Chicago, with the approach of the May 1, 1886, date designated by the

FOTLU for transition to an eighthour day, Knights, craft unionists, and

the IWPAers who helped lead the large Central Labor Union joined forces

to build a huge strike involving perhaps 80,000 workers.

During this strike, it became apparent that Mayor Carter Harrison, who

earlier had urged restraint in the policing of labor disputes, had

abandoned such a policy in favor of the stance of his appointee, police

captain John Bonfield, who held that “the club today saves the bullet

tomorrow.” On May 3, lumber workers rallying for the eight-hour day

joined strikers from the McCormick Harvest Works, involved in a separate

labor dispute, to harass strikebreakers at the latter establishment.

Police fired into the crowd, killing at least two and wounding many

strikers. The anarchist leader August Spies had spoken to the lumber

workers and witnessed the bloodshed. The IWPA, which had promised to

defend the eight-hour strikes against the kind of police, Pinkerton, and

National Guard violence that had caused scores of workers to die in the

1877 strike wave, called the May 4 meeting at Haymarket to protest

police violence and to memorialize the victims at McCormick Works.

Tensions ran high as employers’ associations and the press demanded

decisive antistrike measures while one version of the IWPA’s leaflets

against police violence bore the headline: REVENGE WORKINGMEN, TO ARMY!

The demonstration in Haymarket Square was itself uneventful until the

police attacked. Rain was heavy and attendance light. Mayor Harrison,

who came as an observer, found the gathering peaceable and orderly. But

after the mayor and most of the demonstrators had departed, Captain

Bonfield led 180 police in an attempt to break up the rally. Moments

later, the bomb exploded, sparking a police riot.

The first fruits of the bombing were accelerated campaigns of repression

against the eight-hour strikers, anarchists, and labor leaders in

Chicago and, to an extent, nationally. Chicago’s press mixed

anti-immigrant, anti labor union and antiradical stereotypes in a

hysterical campaign against anarchist “serpents,” who were seen as the

“offscourings of Europe.” Police for weeks kept up a steady pattern of

raids on Chicago labor leaders’ homes and labor organizations’

headquarters, and their spurious reports of finding caches of arms and

explosives just as steadily splashed across front pages of the city’s

daily papers.

Eight IWPA members were prosecuted in this atmosphere for conspiracy to

murder policeman Mathias Degan, who died at Haymarket. In their trial,

State’s Attorney Julius Grinnell affirmed that “anarchy” was the real

defendant and, as Paul Avrich has recently put it, judge Joseph E. Gary

“flaunted his bias against the defendants” at every turn. All eight

defendants received guilty verdicts in August 1886, though no evidence

specifically linked them to the bomb. In November of the following year,

four of them-August Spies, Albert Parsons, George Engel, and Adolph

Fischer-were executed by hanging. A fifth condemned anarchist, Louis

Lingg, killed himself in jail. Oscar Neebe, Samuel Fielden, and Michael

Schwab stayed in jail until released in 1893 by Illinois governor John

Peter Altgeld, whose stinging pardon message acknowledged the injustice

of the trial.

Haymarket’s bomb echoed long and deep. The explosion and ensuing

repression decimated the anarchist labor movement, though the martyred

defendants became heroes to many and inspired countless individual

conversions to anarchism and to socialism. Victimized too were the

Knights of Labor, who suffered both from the general repression of

worker’s organizations and from the refusal of their national leadership

to endorse the broad-based campaign in defense of those accused as a

result of the bombing. The pardons ruined Altgeld’s promising political

career. The tactic of the mass strike was far less appealing to

pragmatic U.S. labor leaders after Haymarket, and the idea of

self-defense by labor never again received so broad a hearing on the

national scale. On an international scale, the Haymarket events and 1886

eighthour strikes contributed to the 1889 decision of the Second

International to adopt May 1 as World labor Day.

REFERENCES

Avrich, Paul. The Haymarket Tragedy. Princeton: Princeton University

Press, 1984.

David, Henry. The History of the Haymarket Affair. New York: Russell and

Russell, 1958.

Forier, Philip S., ed. The Autobiographies of the Haymarket Martyrs. New

York: Mondd Press, 1969.

Nelson, Bruce C. Beyond the Martyrs: A Sooal History of Chicago

Anarchisim 1870–1900. New Brunswi( k: Rutgers University Press, 1988.

Roediger, Dave, and Franklin Rosemont, eds. Haymarket Scrapbook.

Chicago: Charles H. Kerr Company, 1986.