💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › charlotte-wilson-the-commune-of-paris.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 08:55:33. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: The Commune of Paris Author: Charlotte Wilson Date: March 1888 Language: en Topics: Paris Commune Source: https://www.revoltlib.com/anarchism/the-commune-of-paris-liberty/view.php
The Commune of March, 1871, was a new departure along an old track. When
the workmen- of Paris rose against the middle-class assembly at
Versailles, they did more than revolt against mere political tyranny,
more than revolt against incapacity and treachery in face of a foreign
foe. They revolted against property-rule. They revolted to regain an old
popular right lost by the people in the evil days which grew up with the
growth of government and law, and the rule of the property grabbers-the
right of each group of workers, each locality to manage its own
business.
It is an old saying : If you want your business done go yourself, if not
send some one else. Of late years the people have had plenty of this
method of sending some one else. Sending them right away out of sight
and hearing almost ; there to settle how everybody is to do everything.
And when the deputies of the French people handed over Paris to Bismark,
the workers of Paris felt they had had enough of it. So they proclaimed
the Commune, i.e., the management of the affairs of the town by the
people of the town, as had been the way of the free associations of
workers federated for mutual help and protection in past ages, when they
were fighting against the encroachments of robber barons and churchmen
and kings, the spiritual ancestors of our robber landlords and
capitalists and kings and parliaments of to-day.
But when Paris, and the other towns of France which followed her
example, proclaimed the Commune, they did more than re-assert an old
popular right. They took the first active step in realising that new
social state towards which the hope of all the workers of the civilised
world is strained.
Not that they formally proclaimed the freedom and equality of all men;
still less the abolition of property. But that the pressure of their
masters, the monopolists of property, being removed, they just began,
without thinking of it, to lead amongst themselves that peaceful and
orderly social life, which must be free and equal because there is no
authority to protect monopoly, and no monopolists of social wealth to
divide the workers from the means of production, and to live idly upon
the forced labour of others. This sort of free and natural social life
has been the real object of every genuine popular movement. It is the
spontaneous idea of what social life ought to be amongst the masses of
the people.
It is by the forcible suppression of this true social life of the
people, that the ruling classes have established their " law and order."
It is by the resurrection of this true social life in its new form of
International Anarchist-Socialism that they and their law and order will
be overthrown.
In 1871 the masses were still hampered by the evil traditions of past
ages of slavery. They had burst their chains, but the broken links still
bung round their feet and prevented them from moving forward.
They waited, let themselves be persuaded to wait, to elect deputies, to
construct a government,--as if a government of any sort were not the
very incarnation of the anti-social principle which they had revolted to
overthrow.
This feeble shadow of a representative body-which, to do it justice, was
very deficient in the tyrannical spirit of a real governmentmanaged
nevertheless to fall into a series of blunders worthy of a middle-class
parliament. It tried to put itself on a legal and constitutional footing
with its rival at Versailles; as if the revolted workers bad any fair
chance of treating with their angry masters! It issued edicts which no
one thought of even trying to obey. It tried to organise an
administration a la bourgeoise right in front of the enemy's bayonets.
It deceived the people as to the state of the war. Worse than all, it
checked them not only in fighting, but in seizing upon the Bank of
France, the wealth which they had helped to create and the title-deeds
of the land which belonged to the whole people of France.
And whilst these well-meaning adminstrators were discussing, and
hesitating, and deliberating, the dismay and confusion of the ruling
classes subsided and the first outburst of revolutionary ardour amongst
the people died down. The moment for decisive and successful action was
irrevocably lost, and nothing remained for the brave workmen of Paris
but to die fighting for the hope they had missed.
Do we reproach these men, our brothers who led the forlorn-hope of the
Social Revolution? Do we reproach a child who tumbles when he first
begins to walk alone? Their errors of judgment committed in the stress
of battle--battle for which they were not prepared--have been washed out
in their blood. Their noble courage and devotion to the, cause which was
theirs and ours remains a shining example for ever.
Nevertheless we owe it to them, as well as to the cause to profit by
their bitter experience, that it may not have been suffered in vain.
Let us lay to heart the necessity of being prepared to act, when our
opportunity comes to us, as theirs to the workers of Paris in 1871.
Prepared, not with the preparation of an army, organised in well-drilled
battalions, where every man is part of a machine which will not act
until the leaders pill the strings. But prepared like free men, ready
each one of us in heart and mind, sure of our principle of action,
decided as to our aim.
Agitate, educate, organise ! But always in accordance with the new
social relations which we look to see universally established. '-Never
forget that the sole end of preparation is that the people shall be
ready to rely on their own revolutionary initiative and not be scared
from it by the scruples and prejudices or the plausible pretences of
leaders, either timid or self-interested.
The end of the social revolution is not to make men obedient servants.
of a reorganised state, but to set them free to live the social life
which is the spontaneous outcome of their inmost desires.