šŸ’¾ Archived View for library.inu.red ā€ŗ file ā€ŗ belarussian-anarchist-federation-belarussian-anarchist-ā€¦ captured on 2023-01-29 at 21:59:35. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

ā¬…ļø Previous capture (2023-01-29)

āž”ļø Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Belarussian Anarchist Federation
Author: Belarussian Anarchist Federation
Date: 2006
Language: en
Topics: IAF, Belarus
Source: Retrieved on 2020-04-02 from http://www.i-f-a.org.gridhosted.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/anarkiista_debato.pdf

Belarussian Anarchist Federation

Belarussian Anarchist Federation

Two comrades, Pauluk and Maryna, from the Belarusian Anarchist

Federation, an organisation then applying to join the International,

attended the meeting and made a presentation on the situation in their

country at the London Anarchist Bookfair.

---

The collapse of the Soviet Union has resulted in yet another repressive

regime taking power, making it extremely difficult for ana rchists and

others to operate politic ally. This interview focuses on the history of

anarchism in Belarus, as se en through the personal experiences of these

two comrades. It provides insig hts into the situation for anarchists in

the ex-Soviet influenced countries and shows how anarchist ideas and

practices emerge in places where there has not been a strong anarchist

tradition in recent years. The works of our comr ades also illustrates

how people in diffe rent situations take the ideas and mak e them their

own, through creative and imaginative initiatives.

How did you get involved in anarchism? How did you first hear about

it?

Pauluk: I have been in the anarchist movement since 1994. All Soviet

people, sooner or later, hear about anarchism . During our childhood, we

watched f ilms about the Civil War and there wer e always anarchists in

them. The pro paganda portrayed them negatively . But it had the

opposite effect. The anarchists were shown as people w ho, in between

fighting the Reds and Whites, were drinking and dancing. So from

childhood we had the impression that anarchists were fun loving! I was

impressed with the critical position towards the changes in the

political system. Lukashenko, the current President, used the democratic

movement to get elected and then the repression started. So I got the

impression that the problem didnā€™t lie just with the democratic movement

but was somewhere deeper. So I started to try and find out where the

root of the problem was. I read about anarchism and by the end of 1994 I

sympathised with anarchist ideas.

How did you learn about anarchism in Belarus? What did you read?

Pauluk: I read about anarchism in the library; there were books by

people like Kropotkin. But not much was available. We didnā€™t have

contact with other anarchists either in the west or in other eastern

European countries. There wasnā€™t even much communication with other

anarchists in Belarus.

So there was a federation of anarchists at that time?

Pauluk: Yes, already in 1992, founded by 8 people. There are still 6 of

the original members involved. In 1994, there were about 20 people, but

scattered around the country in just two cities so I didnā€™t hear about

anarchism from them, but from books.

So how did things develop from there?

Pauluk: In October 1994 students organised some actions against the rise

in prices on bread and milk. It was a street performance action, with

the slogan ā€˜Thank you President for bread and milkā€™. It was the first

big action organised against the President who had been in office for

two months. The organisation of this action was influenced by anarchists

and so because of this I met other anarchists and by the end of the year

I was a confident anarchist.

Who were these other anarchists? Were they from the federation?

Pauluk: Yes, they were from the Minsk group.

What attracted you to anarchist ideas?

Pauluk: Taking into account that I was coming to the anarchist movement

from the democratic side, I was attracted by the idea that anarchism

seemed the only real democracy. Democracy that the democrats were

talking about was just a lie, an illusion of democracy. I was reading

about other left ideas in general, including Trotskyism, Maoism,

everything possible. Amongst these ideas, anarchism was the only thing I

could imagine.

Maryna, when did you start becoming an anarchist?

Maryna: It is difficult to say because I was very young when the Soviet

Union crashed. I was interested in the punk movement. It seemed natural

that we shouldnā€™t have what we had in the country. Then I met Pauluk and

he just gave a name to what I was thinking about. It was what I wanted,

what I was thinking about. That was in 1998 when I first got involved in

student demonstrations.

---

[The following questions are mostly answered by both Maryna and Pauluk

after discussion between them.]

How many anarchists are there in Belarus?

It is difficult to say because we donā€™t have membership like you do.

Participation in the federation is only possible when you act. About 200

maybe.

After you had the student actions, what did you do? Were you more

involved in the federation?

The federation consists of a number of different initiatives.

Is it like in Poland?

Yes, it is like that but in Poland they have more local groups. This is

because of the history of Poland ā€” there is anarchist intercity

relations. The Belarusian federation also has local sections, but the

work is done around initiatives. One initiative was the anti-Party

initiative. The purpose was of this initiative was to stop young people

get entangled with the work of political parties because they use the

youth as a cheap workforce. So we organised different humorous actions,

ā€˜happeningsā€™ on the street, which made fun of all political parties,

both the government and the opposition.

Why do you think humour is such a good weapon?

We took a risk because had never done it before, we didnā€™t know where it

would lead us, but it led to the fact that the movement began to grow.

But of course we didnā€™t invent it ourselves; we were attracted by a

Polish initiative that was used under the dictatorship where they

organised many street parties and happenings.

Were you at all influenced by the street parties in the west, like

Reclaim the Streets?

No, just from Poland. We read about what was happening in Poland in

newspapers. In the 1990s, there was a drought of information, it was

difficult to get. But now it is possible to get information from the

internet. So the things we did attracted many people, mostly young

people. There was a lot of publicity in the press, saying how anarchists

organised another funny action. So people became interested, thinking

that anarchists must be very amusing people.

Maryna: I remember that I was involved in the nationalist opposition

movement for some months and in one of the meetings the leader told the

audience about how they conducted an action and anarchists were in a

separate block. They were hungry and the anarchists said we have some

sandwiches and offered them around. The leader was trying to laugh at

this but it showed how anarchists were being noticed by people, even

inside other political movements.

After you did these initial actions, what happened next?

One thing was a counter-cultural group that influenced the movement that

organised actions against the military. They were formed in 1995 and by

the end of 1995 they were already in touch with and participated in

actions of the Anarchist Federation. At that time, it was the three main

cities, Minsk, Hroda and Homel that were the basis of the Federation.

There were many actions carried out by different initiatives in the

federation so it is difficult to talk about all of them.

One is the syndicalist group. They organised strikes in places like the

trolley bus depot, they published a lot of propaganda and they had a day

of solidarity with the unemployed. These days of action always ended

with arrests of the participants. The result of this was that many

activists lost their jobs. It is difficult to continue to be a

syndicalist without a syndicate. They didnā€™t work anymore and the

government began to put pressure on all unions so they couldnā€™t practice

syndicalism anymore. One of the people became a local councillor!

What about your paper?

There were several papers before our paper. We got the idea of doing a

newspaper from our anti-Party actions. It is a continuation of our work

to make fun of all authority ā€” the government etc.

Did you do this along with the street parties and ā€˜happeningsā€™?

By the end of 1998 it became more difficult to do actions because the

President issued a decree, which made it likely that you could be

arrested for participating in these actions. We continued to organise

them but not as frequently as before. So we had to replace them with

something.

Where did you get the idea of this newspaper?

It was always in our heads because we had published some newspapers, so

the idea was born quite naturally. And when the first issue was

published we realised we had done the right thing because it was

extremely popular.

And was it mainly popular amongst young people?

No it was popular amongst everyone who was interested in politics. With

the newspaper, all politicians knew about us. First it was a little

newspaper, but after a year we registered it officially. We celebrated

our first year with an action under the slogan ā€˜Legalise Itā€™. The name

of the newspaper, Navinki, is the name of a mental hospital and it also

means ā€˜small newsā€™. The main newspaper is called just ā€˜newsā€™ so we are

making fun in two ways. Our request to register the newspaper officially

was refused because the authorities said that it had the name of the

mental hospital. We made a scandal in the newspaper, so they became

afraid and accepted our registration.

What is your circulation? Do you sell it?

It is difficult to say, about 10,000 copies. First it was a monthly and

then a weekly. But the circulation reduced because some outlets for

circulation were closed. Also, we had a problem that the official

distributors only took our newspaper in small quantities. The private

distribution networks were often afraid to take the paper because of

repression.

What happened to the paper?

Maryna: We were closed by the authorities. We wrote about the President

and ā€˜insulted peopleā€™s moralityā€™. Pauluk was called to court and fined

700 Euros. This was impossible to pay. They came to his parentsā€™ house

and confiscated things from his parents.

What do you now?

We publish an illegal magazine, because illegally you can publish what

you want.

How big is the movement now?

The thing is, we donā€™t have membership, so it is difficult to say. When

people arenā€™t satisfied with the work of one group they may join another

group or start their own initiative and work independently.

Have you been able to maintain an interest amongst young people as

they have become older and because of the repression?

Everyone who comes to the movement understands that there can be

repression. So they donā€™t discover that; they know it already. There is

one main way that we lose comrades: they emigrate for different reasons

such as problems with the authorities. But they keep in contact. Maryna:

My personal opinion is that they do not do much anymore. They are too

busy with making ends meet. We are at the stage where we only have young

people and they are still active, but there are some people who are just

at home, raising children.

What do you think is the most important activity to do now?

Right now the movement and the initiatives are all growing. When someone

comes to anarchism we want to give him or her all opportunities to

participate in the way they want. We are trying to build more of a

network so we have organised social forums that can involve everyone. We

want people to see that they are not alone and that the movement is very

wide, one united front of struggle against the system. And, a person can

find his or her place in this. It is difficult to find ways of doing

something because the State tries to monopolise all possible activities.

They try to get people to communicate only through state organisations.

What do you think about the other organisations that you have come

in contact with when you have been abroad?

Our first contacts were with Russian Anarchists. It is a funny fact that

anarchists from Minsk and from Hroda were put in contact with each other

by Russian anarchists. From our western contacts we got a lot of

information about anarchism in the modern world. Our anarchism was based

on historical anarchism, Kropotkin, Bakunin, and no one really knew what

was going on in the west. We knew about the Spanish Revolution but not

about what happened after the war, like 1968. And when the Iron Curtain

fell, it was a discovery to know what was really happening, your ideas

and what discussions were going on.

But the western countries didnā€™t seem to be familiar at all with what

was happening in the post-Soviet countries. We also noticed that there

are long theoretical discussions, often about small points, while we

discuss more concrete issues. We want to discuss issues that we could

talk about to ā€˜the man in the pubā€™.

In Russia we find that they are often having debates about who is the

better anarchist. To conclude, this interview shows how anarchist ideas

and action emerge in a variety of contexts. For Maryna anarchism is the

name given to what she was thinking anyway. Disillusions with the

so-called new democracy propelled Pauluk into the library, where he

found the ideas that helped him make sense of what was going on. Though

they had no initial contact with anarchists outside their country, their

movement benefited from hearing about what was going on in other

countries.

Similarly, the comrades in the International have been inspired by the

courage, imagination and commitment of the Belarusian Federation. Their

experiences show how important it is to spread anarchist ideas as widely

as possible. There are millions of people who are looking for

alternative perspectives, fed up with the current political and

religious ideologies. We need to make sure that they come into contact

with both anarchist ideas and anarchism in action in order to strengthen

and enrich the global struggle for a new society.

FAB Congress 2005

On the 2^(nd) of October while at the Congress of Democratic Forces the

Belarusian opposition was arguing, electing its united candidate for the

forthcoming presidential election campaign of 2006, Belarusian

anarchists held their Congress to discuss questions which are really

important for the Belarusian society as a whole.

More than 50 delegates from Minsk, Homel, Lida, Vitebsk, Ivatsevitchi

and other Belarusian regions took part in the 12^(th) Congress of FAB

(Belaruusian Anarchist Federation). The Congress discussed pressing

issues of Belarusian society, determined tasks of Belarusian anarchists

in the current social and political situation in the country, as well as

planned some concrete steps for development of the anarchist movement in

Belarus.

One of the most important results of the Congress was the decision about

FABā€™s joining IAF (the International of Anarchist Federations)approved

by consensus of all participants. Representation of Belarusian

anarchists in the International will attract more attention to

Belarusian problems. Moreover it will strengthen international

solidarity and support from foreign comrades that is very important for

Belarusian anarchists, especially after recent repressions against

activists of the antifascist movement.

The Belarusian Anarchist Federation can be contacted via email at

anarchy@tut.by