💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › conor-mcloughlin-free-women-of-spain.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 08:39:59. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Free Women of Spain
Author: Conor McLoughlin
Date: 1996
Language: en
Topics: Mujeres Libres, anarcha-feminism, Spanish Revolution, Workers Solidarity
Source: Retrieved on 7th December 2021 from http://struggle.ws/ws/spain48.html
Notes: Published in Workers Solidarity No. 48 — Summer 1996.

Conor McLoughlin

Free Women of Spain

“It was like being brothers and sisters. It had always annoyed me that

men in this country didn’t consider women as beings with full human

rights. But now there was this big change. I believe it arose

spontaneously out of the revolutionary movement.”

Margorita Balagar quoted in ‘The Blood of Spain’ by Ronald Frazer, p.287

The position of workers and peasants in Spain in the 1920s and 1930s was

bad. If you were female it was appalling. Conditions for Spanish women

were oppressive and repressive in the extreme. The position of women in

Spain in the 1930’s was similar to that in many Muslim countries today.

They had no independence, could be “given away” in arranged marriages

and single women were not allowed out without chaperones.

The average daily wage of a male agricultural labourer was 3 pesetas, a

woman got half this (1.5 pesetas) for working from dawn to dusk. Reforms

often did little to benefit women workers. For example, when the

republican government of 1931 bought in the eight hour day this just

meant that women could be home at 5pm to cook and clean.

The 1931 government had introduced limited divorce, given women the vote

and some limited maternity leave. There was a small movement for

women’s’ rights but it was reformist and based on middle class and

professional women. Within the anarchist movement there was little

discussion of women’s issues. However just before the military coup in

May 1936 two small groups of anarchist women from Madrid and Barcelona

merged to form the Mujeres Libres (Free Women) organisation.

The revolution in Spain began as a reaction to the military coup (see

Workers Solidarity no.47). Workers organised by the anarcho-syndicalist

CNT union and, to a lesser extent, the socialist UGT union federations

took to the streets. The response was spontaneous and courageous,

heavily influenced by anarchist ideas which had a deep implantation

among Spanish workers and peasants.

Women were everywhere in the initial resistance and fought as full and

equal members of the anti-fascist militias up until November 1936, when

the republican government ordered women away from the frontline. Many

were killed in the battle for Madrid. There were changes in work,

leisure and in attitudes towards women.

Women were involved at all levels in the collectivisation of industry

and land. Piece-work in the home was abandoned as women flooded into the

factories. It was a time of tremendous excitement as a wave of

revolutionary enthusiasm swept over the republican zone. As one woman,

Pepetia Carpena of the Catalan regional committee of Mujeres Libres, put

it “even if I had died I wouldn’t have wanted not to have had that

experience.”

Revolutions bring about dramatic social changes. Old expectations,

assumptions and ways of behaving begin to be questioned. But change

doesn’t occur overnight. Rather, change starts with a discussion. It’s

though the often long and messy process of debate and disagreement that

the way in which we see the world is radically altered. So, as we can

see in Spain, no revolution is cut and dry.

In areas where they were well organised, such as Terrasa where anarchist

women in the textile industry had a group since 1931, they gained

maternity leave and full equality of pay. In many cases, though, the CNT

was unable or unwilling to make real it’s goal of full equality. In

textiles, in general, where women formed the overwhelming majority of

the workforce they still had the lowest wages.

On the land there was further to go as attitudes lagged even further

behind. However, in the collectives women found that for the first time

ever they did have a real say, although sometimes not an equal say or

vote to the men. In some collectives such as Mazon and Miramel in Aragon

women and men were paid the same. In many, though, this was not the

case.

These collectives did assume that a woman deserved an income in her own

right, which was an advance. Most collectives, though, had a “family

wage”. This, of course, was almost always paid to the man who would be

assumed to be the head of the household. The social division of labour

remained. “Women’s work” was “women’s work” and when women did “men’s

work” they still got women’s wages !

The CNT was committed, at least in theory, to full and absolute

equality. They declared, at their 1936 Saragosa conference, that after

the revolution “the two sexes will be equal, both in rights and

obligations.”

In practice, up to 1936, the CNT was failing to draw in women. Women in

the union often found that they were not being taken seriously and that

sexism was not uncommon. To combat this the Mujeres Libres group was

founded in May 1936.

They aimed to empower women, giving them the confidence to become

involved in anarchist politics. They saw it as crucial to involve women

directly in the struggle for their own liberation. They did not see

themselves as feminists, in fact according to one member, Soledad

Estorach, most of them had never even heard of feminism. They believed

that ending the domination of women by men was part of a larger struggle

to abolish all forms of domination.

Unlike the feminists who narrowly focused on the individual liberation

of individual women, they believed that the struggle for emancipation

was a collective one for anarchism and freedom as a whole. None the less

a major part of this fight was against the undervaluing of women within

the anarchist movement.

Achievements

During it’s short two year existence Mujeres Libres came to number

30,000 women and achieved much throughout republican Spain. A major

focus was on education. In Barcelona they set up the Casa de La Dona, a

major women’s college, in 1937. By December 1938 the Casa was taking in

600–800 women per day. They ran numerous schools and courses to train

women to enter industry in both Madrid and Barcelona. As well as

technical training they urged trainees to fight for full equality within

the workplace.

They also undertook military training, setting up a shooting range in

Madrid. They opened maternity hospitals in Terrasa and Barcelona, and

many schools for young children. These schools based themselves on the

anarchist idea of education as a process of development and exploration

rather then one of factual brainwashing.

They also fought for and won legalised abortion, contraception and

divorce and, locally, some rights to child care for women workers. As

the war went on many members became increasingly involved in the housing

and education of refugees.

This article only allows for a short summary. Above all else, Mujeres

Libres stuck to their original agenda of emancipation for women through

their own struggle. As the war progressed the socialists, communists and

POUM (anti-Stalinist Leninists) all set up “women’s sections”. All

wished to draw women into the struggle against fascism, and into their

own organisations. None, however, took seriously the idea of women’s

emancipation as a goal in itself. Mujeres Libres was the only group

which did so.

The fate of women in Spain was closely tied to that of the overall

revolution. As this was pushed back by the Communist Party and the

government of the day, so were they. As the militias and collectives

were destroyed their first brief taste of freedom was snatched away. The

victory of Franco only served to copper-fasten this process.

It is clear that the revolution did bring some real gains for women. It

is also clear from the events of the Spanish revolution that women’s

freedom cannot be ignored or side-lined by revolutionaries. It cannot be

left until after the revolution or to “the women’s section.” A struggle

which does not, from the beginning, aim to win freedom and equality for

all does not deserve the name revolution.