💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 579.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 08:36:46. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-05)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

🚧 View Differences

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Key to All Optical Illusions Discovered

2008-06-03 12:05:44

Jeanna Bryner

Senior Writer

LiveScience.com Mon Jun 2, 9:50 AM ET

Humans can see into the future, says a cognitive scientist. It's nothing like

the alleged predictive powers of Nostradamus, but we do get a glimpse of events

one-tenth of a second before they occur.

And the mechanism behind that can also explain why we are tricked by optical

illusions.

Researcher Mark Changizi of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in New York says

it starts with a neural lag that most everyone experiences while awake. When

light hits your retina, about one-tenth of a second goes by before the brain

translates the signal into a visual perception of the world.

Scientists already knew about the lag, yet they have debated over exactly how

we compensate, with one school of thought proposing our motor system somehow

modifies our movements to offset the delay.

Changizi now says it's our visual system that has evolved to compensate for

neural delays, generating images of what will occur one-tenth of a second into

the future. That foresight keeps our view of the world in the present. It gives

you enough heads up to catch a fly ball (instead of getting socked in the face)

and maneuver smoothly through a crowd. His research on this topic is detailed

in the May/June issue of the journal Cognitive Science,

Explaining illusions

That same seer ability can explain a range of optical illusions, Changizi

found.

"Illusions occur when our brains attempt to perceive the future, and those

perceptions don't match reality," Changizi said.

Here's how the foresight theory could explain the most common visual illusions

- geometric illusions that involve shapes: Something called the Hering

illusion, for instance, looks like bike spokes around a central point, with

vertical lines on either side of this central, so-called vanishing point. The

illusion tricks us into thinking we are moving forward, and thus, switches on

our future-seeing abilities. Since we aren't actually moving and the figure is

static, we misperceive the straight lines as curved ones.

"Evolution has seen to it that geometric drawings like this elicit in us

premonitions of the near future," Changizi said. "The converging lines toward a

vanishing point (the spokes) are cues that trick our brains into thinking we

are moving forward - as we would in the real world, where the door frame (a

pair of vertical lines) seems to bow out as we move through it - and we try to

perceive what that world will look like in the next instant."

Grand unified theory

In real life, when you are moving forward, it's not just the shape of objects

that changes, he explained. Other variables, such as the angular size (how much

of your visual field the object takes up), speed and contrast between the

object and background, will also change.

For instance, if two objects are about the same distance in front of you, and

you move toward one of the objects, that object will speed up more in the next

moment, appear larger, have lower contrast (because something that is moving

faster gets more blurred), and literally get nearer to you compared with the

other object.

Changizi realized the same future-seeing process could explain several other

types of illusions. In what he refers to as a "grand unified theory," Changizi

organized 50 kinds of illusions into a matrix of 28 categories. The results can

successfully predict how certain variables, such as proximity to the central

point or size, will be perceived.

Changizi says that finding a theory that works for so many different classes of

illusions is "a theorist's dream."

Most other ideas put forth to explain illusions have explained one or just a

few types, he said.

The theory is "a big new player in the debate about the origins of illusions,"

Changizi told LiveScience. "All I'm hoping for is that it becomes a giant

gorilla on the block that can take some punches."