💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 3867.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 06:29:05. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

🚧 View Differences

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

The Ins and Outs Of In-Process R&D Expenses

2012-03-12 13:30:24

October 25 2007

Good investment choices are the result of careful examination of all available

information relating to the investment under consideration. For many investors,

the primary source of information about their common stock investments comes

from the company's audited financial statements. Having a thorough

understanding of the way information is presented in the financial statements

may impact an investor's decisions. In-process research and development

expenses are a very specific component of the income statement, but having an

understanding of these items and the accounting that surrounds them can help

investors uncover investment opportunities (or a lack thereof) in a newly

acquired company. (To learn more, read Find Investment Quality In The Income

Statement.)

Getting To Know The Basics

When one company acquires another, the purchase price is often an amount that

is greater than the book value of the acquired company. In accounting

terminology, the premium paid over book value is called goodwill, which is

treated as an asset on the balance sheet of the acquiring company. Recall that

an asset is a resource of economic value that a corporation owns or controls

with the expectation that it will provide future benefit. Goodwill resulting

from an acquisition is expected to provide a future economic benefit to the

acquiring company. (To learn more, please see Reading The Balance Sheet and Can

You Count On Goodwill?)

Advertisement - Article continues below.

When an acquisition is completed, the acquiring company must identify and

allocate goodwill to the acquired assets. If an acquired company is conducting

research and development on a new product, but that product is not yet being

sold, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) require that any premium

in the purchase price over book value attributed to that product be expensed.

This scenario is referred to as in-process research and development.

For example, suppose that International Blowfish acquires Fugu Inc. for $1.5

million. Fugu is developing a product that is slated to become its major asset.

Blowfish determines that $900,000 of the purchase price should be allocated to

the product. This amount is considered in-process research and development

because the product is not yet ready for sale as of the closing date of the

acquisition. The product may be only weeks away from being introduced to the

market, but GAAP requires Blowfish to expense the $900,000 rather than record

it as goodwill. (To learn more, read The Basics Of Mergers And Acquisitions.)

Looking for penny stocks that skyrocket?

The Logic

Paying top dollar for another company only to turn around and expense a large

portion of the acquisition price may cause investors to wonder whether it was

worth making the acquisition. In the above example, it really doesn't seem to

be logical, especially because the product was almost ready to be introduced to

the market.

However, although the requirement to expense in-process research and

development costs appears unreasonable, it is actually consistent with the

treatment of similar costs incurred by a company seeking to internally develop

new products. GAAP requires that all research and development costs be

expensed. One may argue that this violates the matching principle of

accounting, which requires that costs be recognized in the same period as the

revenues they create, but research and development costs are expensed because

the future economic benefit generated by the resulting product can be highly

uncertain.

Implications for Investors

Investors who know and understand the rules relating to in-process research and

development expenses have the opportunity to make more informed investment

choices. If an investor believes that current earnings have been temporarily

impaired as a result of the application of the accounting requirements, and

that there will be significant future economic benefit as a result of the

research and development secured in an acquisition, then the investor may be

able to profit from the information if other investors have overlooked this

possibility in their valuations of the company. Conversely, if an investor

believes that the current valuation of a company reflects the expectation of

future economic benefits that may result from an acquisition, but the investor

understands that the acquisition resulted in an in-process research and

development expense, then the investor may conclude that a future benefit is

highly uncertain as reflected in the accounting treatment of the transaction.

This may lead the investor to determine that the stock is overvalued.

Additionally, it may be useful for investors to consider the judgment applied

by management in the application of the rules regarding allocation of goodwill.

Because the application of this accounting principle can be somewhat

subjective, investors should be aware that management may have the opportunity

to use this principle to manipulate earnings. If management over-allocates

expense to in-process research and development, it can understate earnings in

the current reporting period to the benefit of future earnings. (To learn more

about earnings manipulation, please see Cooking The Books 101.)

Investors should determine whether the company has hired an outside consultant

to examine the facts and allocate goodwill. Hiring an independent consultant/

accountant could indicate that management is making an effort to get it right

by receiving objective assessments.

Conclusion

In-process research and development is a complicated accounting concept that

deserves a high level of scrutiny from investors and other users of financial

statements. The accounting principle is not necessarily bad, it is simply the

accounting profession's best attempt to provide accurate financial information

about complex business transactions. Investors who have a thorough

understanding of the principle and know its limitations have the opportunity to

make more informed investment decisions.

by Jerry Sais Jr. & Melissa W. Sais

Jerry D. Sais Jr., CPA, CFA, AIFA, is a registered investment advisor and chief

investment officer of REDW Stanley Financial Advisors, LLC, in Albuquerque,

N.M. Melissa W. Sais is an Albuquerque-based writer and editor.