💾 Archived View for station.martinrue.com › rwa › 8f21823cf6d04237aa66fc2004817c2c captured on 2023-01-29 at 05:26:20. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2022-07-16)

➡️ Next capture (2023-07-22)

🚧 View Differences

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

👽 rwa

I think IPFS is quite appealing due to its completely decentralized nature. But i'm not sure: what kind of use cases would it be useful for? Static content of what type do you serve via IPFS?

1 year ago

Actions

👋 Join Station

7 Replies

👽 mntn

@moddedbear only problem with using it for archival is that someone has to keep the content pinned. If there's nobody pinning the material, and nobody accesses it for a while, eventually it will age out. · 1 year ago

👽 mntn

But its slow speed does limit its usefulness unless you get tons of traffic. · 1 year ago

👽 moddedbear

@kocka_collector That was my experience too when I had some fun playing around with it a few days ago. I don't see it ever replacing the traditional client-server hosting model, but it's a great idea and it seems like it'll be really valuable for archival purposes. · 1 year ago

👽 mntn

Echoing other commenters, it's best as a distributed CDN. · 1 year ago

👽 rwa

Thank for your impressions. I think i just play around a bit with it. · 1 year ago

👽 kocka_collector

I tried IPFS once. The idea seems nice enough, but it took massive amounts of space for larger files, RAM (which is expensive), and CPU power. The latter two may have been because I was using an electron-based client, but I don't remember there really being any other (sensible) options. · 1 year ago

👽 cobradile94

I use it to host files on my website from my computer without wasting space on my Neocities sites. I use it because from what I gather, it’s a way to self-host things in a way that you don’t need your PC on all of the time, since it will stay on other nodes for a while. Seems like a best of both worlds thing, though it can be really slow sometimes, · 1 year ago