💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › rob-los-ricos-the-master-race.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 13:40:39. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: The Master Race
Author: Rob Los Ricos
Date: Summer 2005
Language: en
Topics: Green Anarchy, Green Anarchy #20, race, racism, civilization, whiteness
Source: Retrieved on 12 September 2018 from http://greenanarchy.anarchyplanet.org/files/2012/05/greenanarchy20.pdf
Notes: from Green Anarchy #20, Summer 2005

Rob Los Ricos

The Master Race

Race:...2. A group of people united by a common history, nationality or

tradition.

–The American Heritage Dictionary, 3rd Edition

The one thing that all civilizations have in common, their very defining

characteristic, is the creation of wealth and privilege for a ruling

elite. Regimes may come and go, but the structure is never more than

slightly modified. Elitism is preserved as the sole focus of civilized

societies, no matter who is in charge.

The ruling elite of the New World Order is not made up of any ethnically

“pure” people. People of all ethnic groups are allowed – encouraged,

even – to fight their way into the inner circle, provided they are

ruthless and cunning enough, and that they don’t present a challenge to

institutionalized elitism.

The lives of the wealthy and privileged are so dissimilar to those of

the poorer members of industrial societies, they constitute a distinct

race. The oppression of civilization’s have-nots by the master race can

therefore be accurately described as racism. This racism is the

cornerstone upon which western civilization was built. It permeates

every facet of the West’s social fabric, so that everything which occurs

everyday reinforces the domination of the world and its various peoples

by a tiny minority. The master race uses their wealth and power to

perpetuate racism.

Basing racial critique on skin color and ethnic heritage doesn’t grasp

the totality of racism. If one equates being “white” with being part of

the master race, then how does one explain away the generations of

Euro-Americans who have nothing but contempt for banks, corporations and

governments and are being warehoused in US prisons? Who is “whiter”,

according to the theory of skin privilege: the typical rural American

outlaw, or Clarence Thomas? Who has more power in this country, the

leader of the KKK or Condaleeza Rice?

There may well be more “people of color” among the global elite than

there are “white” people. Skin color is not relevant to the racism that

dominates us.

What the master race has in common is that they have received a Western

education and they do business with Western banks, for the benefit of

Western interests. It’s not ethnicity that makes one part of the master

race, it’s loyalty and service to Western institutions that grants one a

pass into the upper echelons of Western civilization.

(Eco-feminists in south Asia, among others, have pointed out that most

of the powerful and wealthy nations are in the northern hemisphere, so

in deference to their analysis, from here on, I’ll refer to the

colonial, imperialist nations of old as the North. Also, I’ll refer to

the master race as “whitey”, in order to keep the discussion in somewhat

familiar terms. And also because it’s fun.)

After pummeling one another for a millennium, the northern nations

discovered distant lands inhabited by a wide variety of peoples who

shared one thing in common: their societies were not devoted to

developing more efficient methods to slaughter their neighbors. I’m not

suggesting that warfare was unknown outside the North. I am, however,

observing that most peoples had other things to do besides scheming up

easier ways to massacre their neighbors.

The northerners, on the other hand, were so adept at wholesale

slaughter, Christopher Columbus salivated at the thought that his

armored, heavily armed sailors could readily subdue the Arawak and Carib

peoples he encountered on the islands he stumbled upon. He wrote to the

Spanish monarchs that these easy living peoples could easily be forced

to “accept our ways.”

It wasn’t enough to massacre, rape and plunder these other peoples.

Their cultures were to be obliterated and the unlucky survivors forced

to live in a manner acceptable to their conquerors. This was the

original shock and awe campaign.

The peoples conquered by the invading northerners were forced to convert

to Christianity, but more importantly were also forced to labor at the

creation of wealth for their conquerors.

Diseases, wars and forced labor killed off an incredible, incalculable

number of indigenous peoples wherever the invading northerners asserted

their military superiority. It’s no wonder, then, that most of the

survivors came to emulate their conquerors. To many, the choice was to

either adopt the alien civilization or face extermination. This is still

the false choice presented to all of us on a daily basis: work or

starve. The choice is false because it is actually a threat. The

effectiveness of the threat has not diminished over time. However, it is

not really a threat so much as it is a ruse. Because all of us have been

forcibly absorbed into civilization, we have come to accept such ruses

as truisms. “Money doesn’t grow on trees,” we all know. How many of us,

when confronted by such cliches immediately remind ourselves, “No, but

fruit does!” Who needs money, when food is readily available,

everywhere?

This brings up the question of private property, a concept outside of

most human societies throughout our existence. How can a person own a

forest, a mountain or a valley? The very idea is absurd. Land is

timeless. Human’s mightiest civilizations are fleeting.

Yet, here we are in the 21st century, and the work-or-starve ethic has

spread to every land on the planet. And, grotesquely enough, few people

can even question the sanity, much less the ethics, of the equation. Why

is that? Why must everyone on the planet have to live according to one

all-encompassing, suicidal social dictum? Racism, that’s why.

Not a racism based on ethnic or geographic characteristics, but a racism

which presents one and only one worldview as acceptable, and obliterates

everything that could potentially challenge it’s apparent omnipotence.

In a world where Whitey has conquered over all, Whiteyism reigns

supreme. Whitey doesn’t rule because Whitey’s ways are inherently

superior to other People’s lifeways. Whitey rules because everywhere

Whitey goes, the local population is infected with Whiteyism. The

various Peoples begin to see the world through Whitey vision. They

rebuild their societies to accommodate Whitey’s objectives. We all learn

to think, act and live like Whitey. Once a society is infected with

Whiteyism, everyone in that society wants to be Whitey. And the Whitey

wannabes will not tolerate anyone escaping Whitey’s grasp.

The clearest example is that of West Papua. Many peoples there –

stone-age living hunters, fishers, foragers and herders – have made it

clear that they have no desire to give up their cultures and become

Whiteys. They want no part of nation-states or “economic development.”

They want Whitey to leave them alone. Sadly, the Whitey Indonesian

government desires to develop West Papua for Whitey reasons. And the

tribal Peoples there, with their incredible diversity of languages,

stories and wisdom, will either accept Whitey’s ways or they will be

slaughtered. This is happening now.

So, where are the protestations about the racism so explicit in this

genocide? Instead, there are only mild disputes about how to spread

Whiteyism to the Peoples of West Papua. The kinder, gentler Whiteys wish

for the West Papuan Peoples to be allowed a voice in how they become

Whiteys, behind such catch phrases as “sustainable development”. But

almost no one outside West Papua demands that these Peoples be allowed

to live outside the realm of Whiteyism. And just try to argue that the

West Papuans be left alone. Then, all the familiar Whitey attitudes come

to the fore: “These people are ignorant savages”, “They need education

and health care”, “They need...” this and they need that. What almost

everyone in Whiteyland needs or wants is for these Peoples to be subdued

and Whitey-washed, just as they were! There can be no escape from

Whiteyism – everyone must be assimilated. If not, it points out how

complicit the rest of us are in upholding and reinforcing Whiteyism. Few

people in Whiteyland want out of Whitey’s grasp. Mostly, they want what

Whitey’s got.

People emulate Whitey and fight one another for a greater share of

Whitey’s plunder. Whitey’s wealth was stolen from lands and Peoples all

over the world, and Whitey’s been doing this for over half a millennium,

with no end in sight.

That’s why Whitey has vast stores of wealth hidden away, and why all the

poor, under-developed countries are in debt to their conquerors. It’s a

pretty good racket, isn’t it? Take away all the natural resources from

some people, then loan or sell it back to them at a hefty profit. It

makes me sick just to think of it. It makes me even sicker that so few

people see this extortion, this crime against humanity, for what it is,

and do all they can to stop it.

Instead, almost everyone in Whitey’s domain devotes their entire

existence to keeping Whitey in power. And, if called upon, most people

would destroy anyone or anything standing in the way of Whitey’s profit

lust. Just to earn themselves a share of Whitey’s wealth.

Not one so-called opposition group in the North stands against

Whiteyism. Instead, they all – feminists, marxists, syndicalists, ethnic

nationalists, liberals, religious fundamentalists – bicker over who gets

dibs on Whitey’s privileges. The clamor and competition to prove

themselves worthy of Whitey’s favors is disgusting.

We all know how humiliating work is. How employment grinds us down,

takes away our lives, leaves us numb and drives us insane because it

does not fulfill our lives at any level that matters: spiritually,

existentially, passionately, lovingly.

But still we serve Whitey’s will, because doing otherwise entails risk,

hardship and extreme danger. We cower at our jobs in order to keep a

paycheck coming. This is Whitey’s way of bestowing blessings on us.

Whitey rewards the devout with money, the adept with credit. Every time

we purchase anything, we are casting a vote for Whitey’s continued

reign. Every paycheck cashed is an act of devotion to Whitey. Every day

we report to our jobs or schools, we demonstrate our faith that Whitey

will still be in charge in the future, a future we are actively

creating, according to Whitey’s wishes.

Got a credit card? Then congratulations! You are a card-carrying Whitey.

That piece of plastic is nothing but toxic waste anywhere Whitey’s rule

is not firmly established. Your credit rating is the measure of your

Whiteyness: the more important one is to Whitey, the higher the credit

rating. Credit cards, paychecks and cash are worthless to the Peoples of

West Papua. Whitey has not conquered them. And until we cast off the

intellectual, religious, and social chains that bind us to Whitey,

Whitey will continue to rule over us. This is not an impossible task. We

can do this, but it will take real, determined struggle. We’ll have to

endure hardship, face danger, suffer great pain, to rid ourselves of

Whiteydom. This is not something that can be done quickly and without

sacrifice, or in one’s spare time. To tear down Whitey will take nothing

less than the complete commitment of our existences.

If we don’t withdraw our live’s energies from Whitey, we’ll end up doing

as so many generations before us have – sacrificing our lives to Whitey.

No amount of Whitey’s wealth is worth one minute of your life. Do you

doubt that? If so, let me know if you ever succeed in buying one back.