💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › the-utopian-tendency-who-we-are.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 14:25:28. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Who We Are
Author: The Utopian Tendency
Date: 2001
Language: en
Topics: The Utopian, utopianism, position paper
Source: Retrieved on 11th August 2021 from http://utopianmag.com/archives/tag-The%20Utopian%20Vol.%2018.3%20-%202019/utopian-program-statement-who-we-are/
Notes: Originally printed in Utopian 2001. Revised 2016. Rev. 2019

The Utopian Tendency

Who We Are

To look for Utopia means providing a vision for the future – of a world

worth living in, of a life beyond what people settle for as experience

clouds their hopes. It means insisting that hope is real, counting on

human potential and dreams.

To look for Utopia means providing a vision for the future — of a world

worth living in, of a life beyond what people settle for as experience

clouds their hopes. It means insisting that hope is real, counting on

human potential and dreams.

Utopians do not accept “what is” as “what must be.” We see potential for

freedom even in the hardest of apparent reality. Within our oppressive

society are forces for hope, freedom, and human solidarity,

possibilities pressing toward a self-managed, cooperative commonwealth.

We don’t know if these forces will win out; we see them as hopes, as

moral norms by which to judge society today, as challenges to all of us

to act in such a way as to realize a fully human community.

We can describe some of these possibilities: worldwide opposition to the

imperialist domination of the global economy; struggles against

dictatorship in China, Syria, Egypt, and Venezuela; fights for national

liberation in Ukraine, Kurdistan, Palestine, and China (including those

by Uighurs and by Tibetans); cultural movements for the defense and

recovery of indigenous languages and histories; struggles throughout the

world to guarantee women full sovereignty as a right, not a privilege,

dismantling the patriarchal systems that institutionalize the domination

and devaluation of women by men; changes in society’s acceptance of

LGBTQ people and people with disabilities; and struggles against racism,

for the rights of people of color, and for the rights of immigrants.

There will — we hope — be similar utopian phases ahead in mass movements

in the U.S.

But beyond these specifics, we are talking about something familiar to

everyone, although difficult to get a handle on. In small ways, every

day, people live by cooperation, not competition. Filling in for a

co-worker, caring for an old woman upstairs, helping out at AA meetings,

donating and working for disaster relief — people know how to live

cooperatively on a small scale. What we don’t know, and what no one has

found a blueprint for, is how to live cooperatively on a national and

international scale, or even on the scale of a mass political movement.

Nobody has described how the society we want will look, or how to get

it, though we know what it will be: a society where people are free to

be good, a society based on cooperation and peace, not dominance and

aggression.

This is a good time to be publishing a journal dedicated to Utopianism,

revolutionary socialism, and anarchism. Struggles of the red state

teachers; activism in the Black and Latinx communities, and of women,

lesbian, bisexual, gay, transgender, and queer people, indigenous

people, environmentalists, and people with disabilities — these, we

think, are all harbingers of another upsurge coming.

But these are perilous times as well. Destructive effects of climate

change are already being felt. They will get far worse. They demonstrate

capitalism’s disregard for life — human and otherwise — and for the

ecosystem. It is a graphic illustration of the need to reorganize the

way in which we (human beings) relate to and organize the world around

us, as well as our relations with one another, with other species, and

with the entire ecosystem.

The collapse of the Soviet bloc and the fact that China’s Communist

political dictatorship is state-controlled capitalism (with gross

inequality) have done more than just discredit authoritarian Marxism.

They have also discredited, for many, the very idea of changing society

fundamentally. Instead, we see many turning in desperation to the

demagogues of the right, while others look to the statist reformists of

the social democratic left.

Meanwhile, the fabric of the post-World War II world system, already

fraying, is unraveling at its core, the U.S. and Europe. Rising anger at

the gross inequality and assault on living standards of the majority has

resulted in the rise of right- wing movements throughout Europe and the

U.S. Racist, anti-immigrant authoritarians have ridden this anger to

electoral victory in the U.S., Italy, Hungary, Austria, and Turkey, to

name a few.

In the U.S. and the UK, social democrats have also gained adherents

(Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in the U.S.;

Jeremy Corbyn in the UK). But these “democratic socialists” and

“progressives” think that capitalism can be reformed, its rough edges

smoothed. Their prescription to cure the predations of neoliberal

privatization is to increase the scope and authority of the state, with

their ideal being something resembling Scandinavian “socialism”

(contemporary Denmark; Sweden of the 1960s) and/or FDR’s New Deal. So in

the U.S. the leading demand is “single payer health care” — with no

discussion of how this would not be a top-down, bureaucratic

monstrosity, or how it would not come at the expense of another program.

But the cure for privatization is not to increase the power and

authority of the state (be it by regulation, taxation, or

nationalization) but to dismantle the state (the standing army and the

cops; the nightmare bureaucracies) and to reorganize society,

cooperatively and democratically from the bottom up, locally based and

with emphasis on mutual aid. We are confident that new mass movements

from below will rise again, in a massive surge, as did Occupy in 2011.

And we hope and anticipate that, like Occupy (in its initial stages, at

least), these movements will reject reformism and statism.

Another highly problematic phenomenon has been the rise of

Islamist/Jihadist religious fanaticism, which exploits radical hopes for

escape from western domination to build mass support for a tyrannical,

socially regressive, and exceptionally brutal war against both

non-Muslims and the great majority of Muslims. This development is

partly a response to the collapse of secular anti-imperialism in Africa,

the Arab world, and Asia in the past fifty years, and partly to

continuing European/North American domination of these areas, now made

worse by an anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim backlash in Europe and the

United States. The road forward lies in rebuilding a democratic, radical

anti-imperialism, but how this may occur we don’t know.

Moreover, with a few exceptions, revolutionary anarchist and libertarian

socialist groups remain small and their influence limited. Various kinds

of reformism and Marxism still attract radical-minded people. Indeed,

the support for Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Democratic Party primaries

and the growth of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) since the

November 2016 elections show that various strains of left statism,

reformist and Marxist, still attract radically minded people. Reformism

and Marxism, and their corresponding movements, accept the state,

capital-labor relations, conventional technology, and political

authoritarianism. Nevertheless, despite the dominance of reformists and

statists in the world of the organized left, over the past two decades

the influence of anarchists and libertarian socialists has clearly

increased (as was seen in the Seattle protests against the World Trade

Organization as well as the Occupy movement).

It is important to continue to work for freedom and to speak of utopia.

This racist, sexist, and authoritarian society has not developed any new

charms. It remains exploitative and unstable, threatening economic

collapse and environmental destruction. It wages war around the globe,

while nuclear weapons still exist and even spread. Even at its best —

most stable and peaceful — it provides a way of life that should be

intolerable: a life of often meaningless work and overwork; hatred and

oppression within the family, violence from the authorities; the

continuing risk of sudden violent death for LGBTQ people, women, and

Black people; the threat of deportation of undocumented immigrants. The

major reforms of the last period of social struggle, in the 1960s, while

changing much, left African Americans and other Black and brown

populations in the U.S. and around the world facing exclusion and daily

police (state) violence, literally without effective rights to life. The

videos we see every day (in which new technology makes visible what has

always been going on) reveal, like sheet lightning, the reality of the

system we live under. For this society, from its inception, to call

itself “democracy” is a slap in the face of language.

This paradoxical situation — a society in obvious decay but without a

mass movement to challenge it fundamentally — is, we hope, coming to an

end. As new movements develop, liberal-reform and Marxist ideas will

show new life, but so will utopian and libertarian ideas. We work with

this in mind. We have to do what was not done during the last period of

really radical social struggles in the 1960s and 1970s. Among other

things, revolutionary anarchist and libertarian socialist theory very

much needs further development, including its critique of Marxism, and

its ideas about how to relate to mass struggles, democratic and

socialist theory, and popular culture. And we need to reinvigorate the

ideals of anarchism/libertarian socialism and the threads in today’s

world that may, if we can find them and follow them, lead to a future

worth dying for and living in.

Based on all of the above, we state a few basic principles:

We fight for reforms, but we do not believe that capitalism can be

reformed or transformed into socialism via reformism or reliance on the

state, be that reliance via nationalization, parliamentarism, a social

democratic New Deal, or any such statist scheme.

We are opposed to social democracy, electoralism, and the capitalist

parties. Consequently, we are categorically opposed to supporting

Republican or Democratic candidates (including “insurgent” Democrats

such as Sanders, Warren, and Ocasio-Cortez), and third parties.

We are not pacifists. We are internationalists who, as well, support

struggles for national liberation. We oppose neoliberal globalization,

but also oppose the virulent racism and scapegoating being directed at

immigrants, at women, at Black and brown people, at LGBTQ people, at

religious and ethnic minorities. We are for fully open borders.

We support and encourage workers to organize. Organizing may take place

outside the unions, inside the unions, or both inside and outside,

depending on current situations and future developments. And organizing

should not be limited to workplace issues, but should embrace broader

social, environmental, and community concerns as well.

We are anarchists and libertarian socialists. We seek collaboration with

all who share our core values, including those who consider themselves

libertarian Marxists, although our view — of which we hope to convince

them — is that Marx, far from being a libertarian, was an authoritarian

centralist and statist.

This future, we state clearly, is an ideal, not a certainty. The lure of

Marxism, for many, has been its promise that a new world is objectively

determined and inevitable. This idea is not only wrong, it is elitist

and brutal. If the new society is inevitable, then those who are for it

will feel free to shoot or imprison everyone who stands in their way.

That is the key to Marxism’s development from utopia to dictatorship,

which everyone except Marxists is aware of. Nor do we believe in an

inevitable collapse of the present system — capitalism may be able to

continue to push its way from crisis to crisis at the usual cost in

broken lives and destroyed hopes.

We fight all oppression under capitalism and urge all oppressed people

to work in a common struggle to end their own oppression and that of

their sisters and brothers.

We believe people have to make ethical choices about whether to accept

life as it is or to struggle for a new society, and then about whether

the society they are for will be democratic or authoritarian. The only

key to the future is a moral determination to get there, a dream of a

world in which those who were obscure to one another will one day walk

together. We do not know where this key may be found, but we know the

only way to find it is to search for it.

That is who we are.