💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › frank-kitz-the-unemployed.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 10:00:07. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: The Unemployed
Author: Frank Kitz
Date: November 6, 1886
Language: en
Topics: unemployment, Commonweal
Source: Retrieved on 30th August 2021 from https://www.marxists.org/archive/kitz/unemployed.htm
Notes: Published in Commonweal.

Frank Kitz

The Unemployed

The title of this contribution refers to two widely different classes in

society — one at the top ever seeking to escape labour, and one at the

bottom ever engaged in a vain search for labour. The rich unemployed,

falsely styled the upper classes, have called to their aid the French

word ennui to describe the languor bred by sheer pampered idleness ; the

poor unemployed find the word starvation expresses their condition. Not

always the actual deprivation which gives occasion for those annual

returns of death from starvation, which forms one of the strongest

counts in an indictment against the present system, but the slow linger-

ing stinting which, allied with anxiety for the morrow, brings strong

men down to weakness and hurries the old, young, and weakly to premature

graves. Whilst the wealthy are asking where and how to vary their

pleasures, and the journals which pander to them are discussing the

merits of the brothel stage-displays they affect, thousands are facing a

fate in preference to which summary execution would be humane. Week by

week the roll of pauper and suioide deaths mounts up, whilst the rich

are canvassing the qualities of their cellars and viands, or the

lachrymose details of three-volume novels.

The unemployed have at the present moment many champions, who were

silent when some few years back a band of men strove to draw attention,

not only to the distresses of the unemployed, but to the normal wretched

state of the mass who constitute the fringe of labour, and who ought

certainly to have the largest share of sympathy from the true

revolutionist. The noisiest always secure the greatest attention, and

the present agitation anent the unemployed receives its chief impetus

from a totally different cause than that ascribed by the capitalistic

press, which with singular blindness attributes all the commotion to the

unfortunates of our bastard civilisation, those whom they describe as

“social wreckage.” On the contrary, it is because the wave of commercial

depression has reached a higher grade of workers that the present outcry

is heard. It may be writing with bitterness, but not without truth, to

state that this class has looked upon the gradual development of

machinery in the hands of capitalists, and the consequent displacement

of hand labour and increase of pauperism, prostitution, and crime, with

great indifference. They have joined chorus in the harsh epithets which

the upper thief class has bestowed upon the lower ; and the often

involuntary idler of their own class receives from them his full share

of censure, whilst they ignore the profligacy and luxurious living of

the idle rich, who prey upon all. They have passed without protest and

often with approval, on the ground “that it makes good for trade,” the

criminal atrocities committed by our troops abroad in order to make

fresh markets for the shoddy products they think are goods. But now the

fear of starvation is before them, they clamour for a huge system of

out-door relief in a tone that is at once pitiable and degrading.

No, sapient writers of the daily bond-grabbing press, it is the very

“genuine working men” whom you are so fond of distinguishing from the

“residuum,” who are now your chief trouble, and who are not likely

longer to bestow much attention upon your favourite dodge of erecting

the meetings of coteries of ex-beer-duty, ex-fair-trade,

ex-almost-every-thing agitators, and the renegade Socialist, into

representative gatherings.

The aristocratic snob, some specimens of which are turned out fresh from

our universities, are contemptible ; still more so are the snobs of the

counter; but the worst of all are the contented slaves who only ask “

for work, work, work, however exhausting and wearisome, and regard with

indifference those who are crushed by the system. This class will be

readily appeased by relief works, and their revolutionary ardour will

soon cool under the discipline of State-paid gangs, and the men who

achieve these results, whether they belong to the possessing classes or

not, will be the true saviours of society, as Society stands to-day. The

fringe, the unhappy weaklings and others who cannot take part in the

bitter struggle for existence as capitalist greed orders it to-day, will

remain where they are, to be punished for others’ failure in work-house,

hospital, and prison. It is by no means the business of revolutionary

Socialists to help the exploiters to save themselves for a time by

“timely concessions,” but by educating away the miserable prejudices and

narrowness of the working class to proclaim the solidarity of all,

instead of the frequent cry, “Am I my brother’s keeper?” — to infuse a

feeling of brotherhood and sympathy with those at the very base of

society, as the result of enlightened views as to the cause of their

position, and to join with the demand for work and bread, which is now

heard alone, the demand for leisure, culture and refinement — in short,

equality. A revolution must be accomplished by revolutionists, and is

not likely to be accomplished by those who are simply discontented

because an inherently rotten system can no longer afford them continuous

toil. An agitation will commence not because they are unemployed but

because they are ever poor, and instead of the miserable spectacle now

so frequently seen in winter, of gangs of men accompanied by police

asking alms of their enemies, there will be an irresistible demand for

the restitution of the land and means of production, which will have a

different echo to a cry for gang labour.