💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › ricardo-mella-the-rising-anarchism.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 13:41:35. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: The Rising Anarchism Author: Ricardo Mella Date: 1902-03 Language: en Topics: Spain, anarchism without adjectives, translation Source: Retrieved on February 1st, 2017 from https://contrun.libertarian-labyrinth.org/ricardo-mella-the-bankruptcy-of-beliefs-and-the-rising-anarchism-1902-03/
Sequels are never good. But dear friends who, judging the first
installment good, decided to publish it as a pamphlet, ask me to expand
the material a few more pages, and I cannot and do not wish to refuse.
I wrote “The Bankruptcy of Beliefs” in a painful moment, impressed by
the collapse of something that lives in illusion, but not in reality,
which sometimes plays with ideas and with affections, to torment us with
our own impotence and our avowed errors.
The truth does not give way before ideological conventions, and those of
us who profess to worship it, must not, even through feelings of
solidarity, much less through party spirit, sacrifice even the smallest
portion of what we understand to be above all doctrines.
Whoever has followed the gradual development of revolutionary ideas, and
of anarchism above all, will have seen that in the course of time
certain principles began to crystallize in minds as infallible
conditions of absolute truth. They will have seen how small dogmas have
been elaborated and how, through the influence of a strange mysticism,
narrow creeds were finally asserted, claiming nothing less than the
possession of the whole truth, truth for today and tomorrow, truth for
always. And they will have seen how, after our metaphysical drifts, we
have been left with words and names, but completely bereft of ideas. To
the worship of truth was succeeded by the idolization of sonorous
nomenclature, the magic of sensationalism, almost a faith in the
fortuitous combination of letters.
It is the evolutionary process of all beliefs. Anarchism, which was born
as a critique, is transformed into an affirmation that borders on dogma
and sect. Believers, fanatics and followers of men arise. And there are
also the theorists who make of ANARCHY an individualistic or socialist,
collectivist or communist, atheistic or materialistic creed, of this or
that philosophical school. Finally, in the heart of Anarchism,
particularisms are born regarding life, art, beauty, the superman or
irreducible egoistic personal independence. The ideal synthesis is thus
parceled out, and little by little there are as many chapels as
propagandists, as many doctrines as writers. The result is inevitable:
we fall into all the vulgarities of party spirit, into all the passions
of personalism, into all the baseness of ambition and vanity.
How do we uncover the sore without touching the people, without turning
the subject into a source of scandal, into the material of new
accusations and insults?
For many, Anarchism has become a belief or a faith. Who would deny it?
Because this has become so, passionate quarrels, unjustified divisions
and dogmatic exclusivisms have been provoked. That is why, when the
evolution has been completed, the bankruptcy of beliefs, a reality in
fact, must be proclaimed frankly by all who love the truth.
When Anarchism has gained more ground, the crisis must necessarily
arise. Iniquity manifests itself everywhere. Books, magazines,
newspapers, meetings reflect the effects of the rare contrast produced
by the clash of so many opinions that have sneaked into the anarchist
camp. In open competition, doctrinal particularisms fall one by one in
the battle of beliefs. None are firm, and they cannot be, without
denying themselves.
The illusion of a closed, compact, uniform, pure and fixed Anarchism,
like the immaculate faith in the absolute, could live within the
enthusiasms of the moment, in febrile imaginations, anxious for goodness
and justice, but it is exhausted by truth and reason. It dies fatally
when the understanding is clarified and analysis breaks down the heart
of the ideality. And the supreme moment comes to shatter our beliefs, to
break up the ideological clutter acquired from this or that author, in
love with one or another social or philosophical thesis. Why hide it?
Why continue to fight in the name of pseudo-scientific and semiological
puerilities? Truth is not enclosed in an exclusive point of view. It is
not guarded in an ark of fragile planks. It is not there at hand or at
the reach of the first daring soul who decides to discover it. As the
sciences, as everything human is in formation, it will be perpetually in
formation. We are and will always be forced to follow after it through
successive trials; in that no other way is the flow of knowledge formed
and certainty established.
This is how Anarchism will be surpassed. And when I speak of Anarchism
and I say that in minds something stirs that is incomprehensible to the
dying world, and that we sense beyond the ANARCHY a sun, which is born
because in the succession of time there is no sunset without
orthography, I speak of Doctrinal Anarchism, which forms schools, raises
chapels and builds altars. Yes; beyond this necessary moment of the
bankruptcy of beliefs, is the broad anarchist synthesis that gathers
from all the particularisms that are maintained, from all philosophical
theses, and from all the formidable advances of the common intellectual
work, the established and well-checked truths, whose demonstration every
struggle is already impossible. This vast synthesis, a complete
expression of Anarchism that opens its doors to everything that comes
from tomorrow and everything that remains firm and strong from yesterday
and is reaffirmed in today’s clash that scrutinizes the unknown,—this
synthesis is the complete denial of all belief.
There is no need to shout: Down with the beliefs! They perish by their
own hands. Belief, like faith, is an obstacle to knowledge. And in the
restless stirring of so many anarchists speaking, beliefs fail. We will
not hide it. Let every one of us throw away the old dogmatism of their
opinions, the loves of their philosophical predilections, and launching
the mind on the broad paths of unrestricted inquiry, reach as far as the
conception of a conscious, virile, generous Anarchism, that has no
quarrel except with conventionalism and error, and has tolerance for all
ideas, but does not accept, even on a provisional basis, anything except
what is well proven.
This Anarchism is the one that is quietly forming. It is the one that is
elaborated slowly in the beliefs able to feel the pressure of the
atavisms that appear everywhere. It is the one that made me write “The
Bankruptcy of Beliefs:” a cry of protest against the reality of the
anarchist herd; a cry of encouragement for personal independence; a call
for the expansion of the ideal that every day lives stronger in me and
encourages me to fight for a future that I will not enjoy, but which
will be an era of justice, well-being and love for the men of tomorrow.
This Anarchism is the rising Anarchism, capable of collecting within its
breast all libertarian tendencies, capable of encouraging all noble
rebellions and of impressing on generous spirits the impulse of freedom
in all directions, without hindrance and without prejudice, with the
sole condition that exclusivism does not raise Chinese walls and that
the understanding is delivered entirely and unreservedly to the truth
that beats vigorously in the most diverse modalities of the new ideal.
It will no longer be said in the name of Anarchism: No further! Absolute
justice, revived in the dogma that now dies, will be but the
indeterminate goal that changes as human mentality unfolds. And we will
not fall into the strange and singular error of setting a limit, however
distant, to the progress of ideas and forms of social benefit.
The rising Anarchism proclaims the beyond endless, after having knocked
down all the barriers raised by the age-old intellectual absolutism of
men.
Don’t you believe that all the particularisms, all the theories, are now
failing, that all the factories of rubble, awkwardly raised for the
glory of new dogmas, are collapsing? Don’t you believe that the
bankruptcy of beliefs is the last link in the human chain that breaks
down and offers us the full breadth the anarchist ideal, pure and
without blemish?
Faith will have blinded you. And you wound do well to renounce the word
freedom; that can be a herd even in the midst of the most radical ideas.
For our part we limit ourselves to record a fact: anarchists of all
tendencies resolutely walk towards the affirmation of a great social
synthesis that encompasses all the various manifestations of the ideal.
The walking is silent; soon will come the noisy break, if there is
anyone who insists on remaining bound to the spirit of clique and sect.
Whoever has not emancipated himself will be left behind with the current
movement and will seek redemption in vain. He will die a slave.
Ricardo Mella
Sources:
La bancarrota de las creencias, by Ricardo Mella, «La Revista Blanca»,
107, Madrid, December 1, 1902.
El Anarquismo naciente was published as a continuation of La bancarrota
de las creencias, in a pamphlet published in Valencia, in 1903, by
Ediciones El Corsario.
[Working translation by Shawn P. Wilbur]