💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › anonymous-where-is-the-impatience.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 07:50:05. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Where is the Impatience? Author: Anonymous Date: Summer 2019 Language: en Topics: time, impatience, Fernweh, Munich, The Local Kids, The Local Kids #4 Source: Translated for The Local Kids, Issue 4 Notes: First appeared as Wo ist die Ungeduld? In Fernweh (Anarchistische Strassenzeitung, MĂĽnchen), Issue 30, December 2018
“In times of stagnation, whether it is out of lethargy or tyranny, life
cannot come into existence. Living is unrest that is sparked by
eccentric individuals. To live this life one has to take risks… Who
wants to live, has to live dangerously.”
Actually it seems that lots of people have daily a load of time at hand.
The everyday exploitation is limited to a bearable level and is only a
side phenomenon. Yet also this unemployment – “free” or freely organized
time – is therefore not less stressed or constrained; irrespective if
one pursues social trends and duties or if one indulges in non-activity,
be it through the consumption of goods, of media and entertainment, of
small-talk or drugs etc.
Also a lot of people who actually “share the opinion” that everything
should be “different”, are often in a state of permanent vegetation and
lethargy which runs somewhere in between isolated self-care in an
attempt to get on and cope, and some unreal, prefabricated behaviour
that is confined to spending time in thought factories (universities),
sport factories (fitness studios), fun factories (parties), experience
factories (holidays) or rather all possible forms of work. The
oppositional alternatives, those right in front of us, are from their
starting point on just a staging, a “as if” activity, that pretends to
change an aspect of society through a particular fake-activity and thus
limits itself from the outset. The consumption of protest events, the
adherence to certain countercultural labels and symbols, identities and
offers, some charity work, a few donations and benefit concerts, a bit
of alternative food and consumption behaviour. All in all is society
shaped by the belief in that what seems possible and what “is
impossible”, and breaking out of this paradigm seems also impossible.
This belief is a deeply scientific belief which explicitly denies a
guiding hand and a almighty Lord and Creator, but then again declares
what the natural laws of men are, its deepest instincts and thus what
the necessary course of human history is. To understand and consequently
obey these inherent laws of society is just rational – what can YOU
achieve after all?
However, our inner will to live, fully and deeply live, our uniqueness
and the wealth of our desires and capacities cannot be measured with the
criterion of science. They are not superficial, quantifiable facts. The
rationality of the material world opposes the logic of the gut, the own
and individual will doesn’t recognize calculated reason. Our
contemporary understanding of the meaning of life is substantially tied
with the concept of time: when it is about what we want to be or do, we
divide certain periods of life into certain areas and organise, invest
and offer or manage our energy consequently. According to expectations
we invest our time and capacities in this or that activity and thus
results a life inside society and a status inside the social
hierarchies. One beliefs in happiness through money, another in
happiness through alcohol, one in happiness in the family, an other in
happiness through sport or a higher meaning in social and political
commitment… What keeps together all these life’s missions is the belief
in time – one always exchanges time for something specific, harvests
something – be it love, a high, prestige, muscles or just the hope in
something… To see our life as a whole, as something that we can take in
our hands to determine it ourselves, to be aware of and to here and now
shape the endless extent and scope of our possibilities and to shape our
ideas and relations without guidelines and benchmarks – to live and not
manage our time – is something that seems strange, even impossible.
Thinking inside of a time frame blocks us to live passionate – because
it is dangerous, since we could risk something. And actually it is
rather comfortable inside this social cage that has clipped our
imagination and wings… and treats us with infinite playgrounds.
But freedom is not a pleasant platitude, not a Disneyland or a land of
milk and honey. It is dangerous, because it confronts us with ourselves
and the endless possibilities that we are willing and capable of giving
form. Or to fight for. In the fight against society – against its
rationality and its docile beliefs in the interchangeability and
limitations of humans – the belief that we can individually look like,
think and talk about, but that we are not capable of getting beyond life
inside the social cage… and also not dare to. This belief in the
necessity of the limitations of life and our individuality through
collective, social unfreedom maintains itself through the belief in what
humans are supposedly capable of, in what generally is impossible. This
belief is mirrored in the step-by-step politics of those who always want
to adapt their ideas to the masses, to find them where they supposedly
are. One seeks consensus, portrays a good image and shows patience since
actually the people are still not ready. One has to negotiate a bit, to
educate a bit… But what are we actually waiting for? Do we want to break
with this social cage, or do we want to politically negotiate and
manoeuvre about it? Is this about a prison revolt or about more exercise
time?
We only can talk about freedom in freedom. Only when we change the art
of living we confront ourselves with life. Change starts in ourselves,
in our surroundings, in everyday life. Something new arises from
nothing. Only the rupture with the old makes place for what is possible,
for what we can shape. In this nothing, this unknown, can our freedom
and possibilities expand through others and grow beyond itself. Beyond
the masses and their lethargy lies the confrontation with yourself, the
break with habits, social devotion and calculation.
Enough of political tactics, enough of reasonable estimations of
possibilities, enough of fear for the unknown. Why should we be afraid
of “scaring the people”? Why should we be afraid to not “be understood”?
I fear to squawk the same signs and words till exhaustion, to repeat the
same, well-rehearsed rituals and empty phrases and to settle in the back
of one’s mind for the social securities in our big playground… future
planning, money, family, a long life, some “freedoms”… Why dare
something, why jeopardize something, when it is so comfortable?
And where is the impatience? That savage, that urges us with fury to
live?
And yes, the fight against this society is not a lonely fight, it is a
social fight, but it starts with me.
“Logic may indeed be unshakeable, but it cannot withstand someone who is
determined to live.” - Franz Kafka