💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › ben-d-what-is-anarchism.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 07:57:21. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: What Is Anarchism? Author: Ben D. Language: en Topics: introductory, syndicalist Source: Retrieved on January 1, 2005 from http://www.cat.org.au/aprop/whatis.txt
Anarchism is a social philosophy which says that every individual has
the right to make decisions for her or himself about things that affect
her or him. Consequently, it is also a social philosophy which opposes
every intrusion of the principle of authority into relations between
people.
Anarchists oppose the principle of authority — the principle of
command-and-obey, of leaders and led, or of masters and slaves — because
they see people’s capacity to control the course of their own life as
the precondition for realising their humanity — their “selves” or “who
they are”, in everyday language. Anarchists believe that people for whom
this capacity is denied (by some other person, for instance) are simply
slaves, since they are executing the will of some other individual, not
their own.
The ability of every individual to utilise their inborn capacities for
critical, logical and rational thought is the foundation of their
self-awareness. It is simply the idea that “I think, therefore I am”.
Those who do not think do not live in the proper sense, although they
might walk, talk, eat, drink, breathe, go to the toilet, as well as a
million other things. This is because it is possible to be physically
alive as well as spiritually dead at the same time. To live means to
participate in life, means to have some impact on the surrounding
environment.
Anarchists believe that no individual has the right to issue orders to
another. We are all capable of rational thought; we should therefore all
be capable of getting things done through collective decison-making
processes, rather than through social systems where someone orders and
someone obeys.
Anarchists extent the above principle to its logical conclusions, and
therefore favour the abolition of those social insitiutions founded on
the principle of authority: capitalism and the state. Capitalism is the
system whereby some monoplise social wealth, thus impoverishing the
majority and making them dependant on them for survival. Capitalism is
also the system whereby the majority of people are exploited by the rich
be being paid less in wages than the true value of their labour — a fact
disguised by the wages system. There is therefore two classes in
society: the producing class, or the workers, who survive by undertaking
physical or mental labour in return for wages, and the parasite class,
the rich, or the capitalists, who survive by exploiting human labour.
The State, meaning the sum total of the police, the law courts, etc and
not society, is the system whereby the right of the capitalists to
monopolise social wealth (the social wealth that should be owned
collectively and managed equally by all) is consecrated in law. Respect
for the law being maintained by means of state violence, through the
police the army, and so on, the state thus becomes a mechanism of social
control, a mechanism for oppression the people for the benefit of the
rich.
In a nutshell, Anarchists view the state as a institionalised,
coordinated, systematic apparatus of terrorism, directed against those
who threaten the social privileges of the rich and powerful. Any good
that the state does, such as protecting society against mad people, is
only done in order to retain a monopoly over authority.
In the place of capitalism and the state, anarchists desire a social
system that would ensure social freedom and material equality. They
believe that such a system would be based on the principle of free or
voluntary association and on the principle of “from each according to
their ability, to each according to their needs”. Instead of being
forced to work through need, people would be able to work where they
chose or where they were needed, participating in decicion-making
processes and free of domination and exploitation by their employer.
Alternatively, they would be able to work for themselves as
individualists, so long as they didn’t hire workers to exploit.
Anarchists call the system by which they would have society organised
Direct Democracy, meaning self-management of the various parts of the
social organism by those involved. More precisely, anarchists would have
society organised through a dual system of federated communes and
federated industrial unions. Workers in each industry would undertake
production on the basis of worker self-management, coordinating
production in the interests of the community through
industrially-organised unions, within which decision-making power flowed
from the bottom up. Decisions would be made by general assemblies of
workers within the individual workplaces, and coordination between
different workplaces would be carried out by mandated, recallable
delegates. Rather than the government of people, society would be based
around the administration of things. There would be no need of police,
because class divisions in society would disappear with the abolition of
private property, and so any rational need to compete against other
human beings.