💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 4356.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 06:09:13. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

🚧 View Differences

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Corporate savings - Dead money

2012-11-06 10:20:53

Cash has been piling up on companies balance-sheets since before the crisis

Nov 3rd 2012 | WASHINGTON, DC | from the print edition

MONETARY stimulus gets you only so far. In America, third-quarter profits and

revenues for companies in the S&P 500 index appear to have fallen year on year

for the first time since 2009, according to Thomson Reuters. Profits for

roughly half the firms in the European Stoxx 600 have fallen short of

expectations so far.

Companies in search of a culprit may want to glance in the mirror. Firms are

trimming their budgets for everything from technology-consulting services to

semiconductor equipment in the face of what Sir Martin Sorrell of WPP, a

British advertising and marketing giant, calls four grey swans (unlike black

swans, people know about grey ones). The four worries unnerving business are:

the euro-zone crisis; upheaval in the Middle East; a possible recession in

China; and America s economic health and fiscal cliff the combination of tax

increases and spending cuts scheduled to occur at the end of this year.

This is not a new problem. Investment has steadily risen since the recession

ended, but not as vigorously as profits. In America, for example, nominal

capital expenditure this year (on an annualised basis) has risen by 6% compared

with 2007; internal cash flow is up by 32%. Companies have been net suppliers,

instead of users, of funds to the rest of the economy since 2008. Firms in the

S&P 500 held roughly $900 billion of cash at the end of June, according to

Thomson Reuters, down a bit from a year earlier but still 40% up on 2008.

Business leaders and conservative critics cite that cash mountain as proof that

meddlesome federal regulations and America s high corporate-tax rate is locking

up cash and depressing investment. But that cannot explain why the same

phenomenon prevails worldwide. Japanese companies liquid assets have soared by

around 75% since 2007, to $2.8 trillion, according to ISI Group, a broker. Cash

stockpiles have continued to grow in Britain and Canada, too, to the immense

frustration of policymakers there. Dead money is how Mark Carney, the Bank of

Canada s governor, has described the nearly $300 billion in cash Canadian

companies now hold, 25% more than in 2008. Mr Carney admonished them to put

money to work and if they can t think of what to do with it, they should give

it back to their shareholders.

No single factor seems to explain companies high savings. The Bank of England

notes that natural-resource companies account for a disproportionate share of

the cash build-up. That may reflect the boom in commodities prices and the

paucity of promising new sources of supply.

Low interest rates have reduced borrowing costs, adding roughly a percentage

point to American profit margins, according to BCA Research. (Yet rock-bottom

interest rates also make it less attractive to hold cash.) The financial crisis

has made firms more skittish about relying on banks or securities markets for

funds. Since questions were raised in 2008 about the ability of General

Electric s finance arm to fund itself, the company has been stockpiling cash:

$85 billion at the end of the third quarter, the most in the S&P 500.

A rapid reversal is unlikely. That s because rising corporate saving has deeper

roots than the crisis, the commodities boom or this interest-rate cycle. In a

recent study Loukas Karabarbounis and Brent Neiman at the University of Chicago

found that across 51 countries they examined between 1975 and 2007, companies

share of private saving rose in aggregate by 20 percentage points. In countries

where corporate saving rose, labour s share of GDP in the corporate sector

shrank, by five percentage points in aggregate.

Mr Karabarbounis and Mr Neiman link both rising corporate saving and labour s

shrinking share of GDP to a fall in the relative price of investment goods that

began in the early 1980s. That drop may be down to the plunging cost of

computing, or to the shift in capital-goods production towards lower-wage

developing countries, or both.

Whatever the reason, firms have responded by substituting away from labour and

towards capital, and by more than textbook economic models imply. And to

finance this investment companies have steadily boosted saving over time. (Just

as households can save each year and take out a mortgage, that does not mean

firms stopped borrowing: indeed, American businesses have by some measures

become more indebted in recent decades.)

The authors do not have comparable data for all 51 countries since 2007. But

they do have numbers for the four largest economies (see chart). The data there

show that the corporate share of private savings has since dipped a bit, in

part because household savings have risen, although it remains high in absolute

terms. (Labour s share of GDP has stabilised at a low level.) The urge to save

may be lessening. Japanese firms, with few growth prospects at home, have been

making foreign deals. Marc Zenner of JPMorgan Chase notes that in the past 18

months firms that announce acquisitions have been rewarded with higher share

prices.

Yet even if they are loosening the purse strings a bit, companies are unlikely

to abandon their frugal ways in the near future. Falling corporate-tax rates

have increased the appeal of capital over labour; heightened uncertainty and

capricious funding markets seem a recurring part of the landscape. That should

make firms all the more determined to fund growth internally. Between now and

2016, GE expects to generate $100 billion in cash, enough to finance

investment, acquisitions and dividends, and to buy back enough stock that

shares outstanding will be lower than before the crisis. Asked recently if GE

was tempted to spend more of its cash pile on acquisitions, Jeffrey Immelt, the

chief executive, replied: It s not burning a hole in our pocket.

from the print edition | Finance and economics