💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › el-libertario-editorial-collective-on-infiltration.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 09:37:32. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: On infiltration...
Author: El Libertario editorial collective
Date: March 2010
Language: en
Topics: El Libertario, police, security, security culture, how to, activism, surveillance
Source: Retrieved on 16th August 2020 from https://christiebooks.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/WorldThatNeverWas.pdf?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=eb688a782c68439bf310974c1d52fff2babaa50f-1597579982-0-ARBDj1ZqYid18tF0HlHE0k2GQQBTlxXatz-CHlPnicf2olWkX_vud7LREBg4vXrq
Notes: This article was originally published in El Libertario #58, March-April 2010. Although originally based on the actual experiences of Venezuela’s social struggles, it deals with situations and facts of interest to activists anywhere. Translated by Luis Prat.

El Libertario editorial collective

On infiltration...

For some time now the Venezuelan government has made systematic advances

in the reorganization of the national police intelligence system, with

the intention of discovering and neutralizing autonomous social

movements that appear in the country. The Intelligence and

Counterintelligence Law (temporarily suspended) and the new Bolivarian

Intelligence Service (SEBIN in Spanish) are but two examples of this. In

order to promote the necessary knowledge on this issue among activists,

we give an informative recap of the different tactics used by the State

to break up the antagonistic social fabric and criminalize its

followers.

The State’s intelligence tactics

These tricks were developed and/or systematized by the COINTELPRO

program of espionage,provocation and information the FBI used to destroy

dissident political groups in the United States.They have been used by

most of the world’s States and Venezuela is no exception. Here are some

examples:

Surveillance: Intelligence and security organizations use the existing

technologies to conduct exhaustive surveillance of activists to prepare

the corresponding judicial files. To that end they use the existing

surveillance technologies. Photographing, filming, following in

vehicles,reading email and correspondence are some of the many tactics

used against social militants.

In general, mobiles/cell phones and frequently visited places are

infiltrated by the police to eavesdrop in conversations and do what’s

called “information sharing” to combine different pieces of information.

Let’s not forget that in Venezuela CANTV (State enterprise that

monopolizes telephone landlines) and most private communications

enterprises lend themselves to such manipulation by the State.

Infiltration: The State usually places undercover agents in popular

demonstrations or inside the assemblies with a dual intent: first, to

take note of the persons gathered and the information discussed in the

assemblies, second, to promote discord among the attendants in order to

trivialize the issues. Not many people go to a gathering without

previous interest in the conflict or knowledge of some of the people

involved. Since the intelligence services normally use dumb or rookie

police for this task, a simple conversation with them usually uncovers

who is a plant and who isn’t.

A usual trick is the use of informers. These are people close to the

group who, for money,favors or the resolution of judicial problems give

information about the group to the intelligence agencies. They are hard

to detect and more than once activists have been falsely accused of

being informants. This has been used successfully against armed groups

particularly in the previous century. Because of this, action groups

today tend to be smaller and based on extreme affinity and even family

ties.

Another form of infiltration is people who attend a reunion or assembly

for the first time and push for extreme or violent acts regardless of

the issue being discussed. They stand out because of their subversive

rants and their proposals for crazy ideas or plans rarely in tune with

reality.

Rumors: The use of informers and infiltrators contributes to the spread

of rumors that tend to divide a social front or collective. These

baseless rumors seek to discredit the organization and its activists.

False communiqués: Intelligence organizations usually write misleading

stuff to create confusion among activists and their kindred

organizations. The idea is to find a contradiction within the group that

will cause its implosion. For example, in Chile the District Attorney

created a group named Frente Anarquista Revolucionario (FAR)

[Revolutionary Anarchist Front] that in a provocative fashion claimed

responsibility for false actions and stirred polemics with the informal

Chilean groups in order to destroy them.

Media disinformation: Certain media work in tight cooperation with

intelligence organizations. In general they try to create a preconceived

opinion about demonstrators and activists, accusing them of sabotage, of

being “enemy agents”, “out of control”, or “maladjusted”. An example is

the Venezuelan TV program “La Hojilla” whose anchor –a well known and

decorated police informant- plays prosecutor, judge and executioner of

dissidents against the current government. The media also serves to

broadcast wrong information about groups and initiatives or to publish

manipulated information about some activist, attempting to discredit

his/her commitment with whatever causes he or she upholds.

For this reason the use of counter information is a fundamental tool. In

Venezuela – a country where the majority of the radio-electronic media

is in the hands of the current government-the use of blogs, Myspace,

Twitter or other communication networks is a necessary tool today and

will become even more so in the future.

Harassment: In many countries, intelligence organisms use pressure such

as telling the boss an employee is a “radical” or inserting information

among his/her acquaintances to make him/her feel uncomfortable or

persecuted in their trusted milieu. Accusations such as “homosexual”,

“rapist”,“drug addict” are common. Another form of harassment is when

the State determines the identity of an activist and decides to arrest

or interrogate him/her under any pretext. In many cases the arrest is

used to “plant” drugs or other things considered illegal (Molotov

cocktails, explosives etc). The goal is to make them quit their

activism.

Sabotage: Police organizations (or people connected to them) do sabotage

against the meeting places of activists as well as theft of materials.

They try to sow fear and discouragement among the sympathizers.

Paramilitary: Intelligence organisms form paramilitary organizations

which they equip with weapons and train them to perform the “dirty work”

that is not convenient to do under“constitutional legality”. In

Venezuela this is formed by the evil “combat corps” or the

diverse“popular collectives” that police the poor neighborhoods.

Lethal force: When somebody in a social movement achieves notoriety and

other means of control or cooptation by the institutional powers fail,

they resort to assassinate the dissident either by thugs (masquerading

as common criminals) or in supposed confrontations that are usually

uncovered if there is an objective investigation.

Some measures to avoid infiltration

cell phones can transmit information even when they are off. Put them in

a place removed from the discussion area or put them in the refrigerator

[TN: better yet, remove the battery]. Black Berrys use GPS (Ground

Position System) that gives the exact location where you are. Cell

phones are use for data sharing and to establish a dissident’s social

network.

reconnoiter the outside area and try to identify suspicious activity

that could imply undercover police, usually recognizable by their

physique, their way of talking or because they look out of place. Rarely

will they look you in the eye and they many times stumble with their

explanations.

in case your email falls in the wrong hands you will not expose other

people.

prevent the intelligence organizations from obtaining your IP (your

computer ID code)

antidotes against infiltration and repression. Better a few but secure

than many and insecure.

circulate ill-intentioned information.

provocateurs.

right to remain silent. Don’t collaborate with them. Unlike in the

United States, in Venezuela collaboration with the district attorney

doesn’t exonerate you and only symbolically diminishes your sentence.

How to secure your computer

Today computers are the place where activists keep most of their

writings and communiqués. Inmost raids the first things the security

forces confiscate are the computers so we recommend the following:

ZoneAlarm (www.zonealarm.com) which are free to download and work with

Windows.

be downloaded free at www.lavasoft.de

in the hard drive. There is a program called Clean Disk that totally

erases them, download it here www.clean-disk-security.softonic.com

(www.pgp.com) that has been successfully used by activists in many

countries.

digit code containing letters and numbers. A short password is easy to

detect. Don’t use birth dates, or the names of family members or pets.

free and secure email addresses to activists.

Avoid paranoia

Some activists become paranoid, which completely immobilizes them,

abandoning the struggle andb ecoming passive members of society.

Therefore it is important to think about what was said above so we can

act with prior knowledge and diminish risks and weaknesses. We must be

conscious of the fact that any struggle for the collective is the

potential target of police surveillance and that is part of the social

dynamics. The armed organizations of control and repression have been

created to counter any type of dissidence therefore by being activists

we become their target; however, we have better values than they do: our

convictions we uphold for a positive social change. Don’t let fatigue

and fear stop you!