💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › workers-solidarity-federation-unions-and-revolution.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 14:56:03. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Unions and Revolution
Author: Workers’ Solidarity Federation
Language: en
Topics: revolution, South Africa, syndicalist, trade unions
Source: Retrieved on January 1, 2005 from http://www.cat.org.au/aprop/unions.txt

Workers’ Solidarity Federation

Unions and Revolution

Anarchist-Syndicalists stand for a revolution by the working class and

the poor to smash all oppression and create a free stateless socialist

society. The trade unions will play a leading role in this process. It

is also vital to organise in the community.

Why Class Struggle?

Class struggle is the key to changing this rotten society. We working

and poor people create all social wealth but we do not get the benefits.

Our work is controlled and exploited by the capitalists and top state

officials — the ruling class.

We are not powerless. We can hit the bosses and rulers with mass

actions, particularly at the workplace. Only we workers and poor people

can create a free society because only we do not need to exploit.

The bosses and rulers created racism (and other oppression). They wanted

to super-exploit Black people to make more profits. They wanted to

divide our resistance by splitting us to into Zulus, Shangaans, Xhosas,

Sothos, Indians, Coloureds and Whites. We can only defeat racism by

smashing the bosses — of all colours.

All Black people are victims of racism, but the Black middle and upper

class elite is shielded from the worst effects of racism by their

privileged status. They can live in the suburbs, go to private schools

and earn big salaries — we can’t. We must fight racism wherever it

exists. But the working class must not form alliances with the Black

managers and capitalists, because they will always choose profits over

socialism.

Defend the Trade Unions

The trade unions are one of the most important mass movements that the

working class and poor have built. The unions were built to defend and

advance the class interests of the workers and the poor.

Even the most bureaucratic and reformist union must defend its members’

interests or it will collapse. The unions have massive potential power

because they can disrupt production, the source of the bosses wealth.

They promote class consciousness, solidarity, and confidence because

they organise people to fight as working and poor people against the

bosses and rulers.

It is nonsense to say that the unions “serve” the bosses. Even the most

“progressive” boss will oppose the unions because they are a challenge

to his exploitation of workers. Even the most reformist union cannot be

totally “incorporated” into capitalism because capitalism cannot satisfy

the needs of workers.

Full Union Democracy

Unfortunately many unions have a strong bureaucracy of paid officials

and leaders. This group is better paid than ordinary workers and has

many privileges. Because of these conditions they develop different

interests to ordinary union members. Ordinary workers need to take

action to improve their conditions, but bureaucrats want the unions to

avoid struggles and spend their time negotiating with the bosses.

We oppose the union bureaucracy because it undermines union struggle and

because it is a threat to union democracy. The existence of a

bureaucracy is not inevitable. The Spanish CNT (a mass

Anarchist-Syndicalist union federation) had a million and a half members

but only two elected full-time officials. We think the union bureaucracy

must be dissolved and the unions controlled by workers on the ground.

Oppose Reformism

Another problem that exists in many unions are reformist ideas.

According to these ideas, capitalism and the State can be changed to

look after the needs of the workers and poor. We reject these ideas

because we know capitalism and the State are based on putting the wealth

and power of a minority of exploiters ahead of the needs of the workers

and the poor.

Revolutionary Potential of Unions

We think that unions are powerful weapons in the struggle for better

conditions and against oppression like racism. We also believe that

unions can organise workers to go on the offensive and destroy

capitalism and the State, by organising the revolutionary seizure and

democratic control of the factories, land, and offices.

The idea that unions and union members can only become revolutionary in

“revolutionary conditions” is mistaken. Revolutionary situations are not

something that “just happen” to workers. They are also the product of

workers struggles, workers organisations, and workers aims.

It is also wrong to say unions “exist within capitalism”, and only exist

to improve the terms on which workers are exploited (rather than put an

end to the system itself). In 1936, for example, the Spanish CNT armed

workers to smash an attempted fascist coup, and spearheaded a successful

mass movement of 7 million workers and peasants to seize the land and

factories and manage them through democratic collectives.

Boring-from-Within

We must do two things if we want the unions to play a revolutionary

role. First, get rid of the union bureaucracy and make sure that the

unions are controlled by the membership. Second, win the union

membership over to Anarchist- Syndicalist ideas.

We must work within the existing unions to achieve these goals. All

unions are workers combat units. Leaving the mainstream unions to form

new “pure” revolutionary unions has serious consequences. It withdraws

militants from the unions, leaving them at the mercy of bureaucrats and

reformists. It isolates militants in tiny splinter unions because the

masses prefer to join large, established unions. Small groups of

revolutionaries working inside established unions can achieve impressive

results. For example, the main French (CGT) and Argentinean (FORA) union

federations were won over to Anarchist-Syndicalism in this way in the

early twentieth century.