💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › petr-kropotkin-letter-to-lenin.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 13:22:13. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Letter To Lenin (21 December 1920) Author: PĂ«tr Kropotkin Date: December 21, 1920 Language: en Topics: letter, repression, State socialism, Russian Revolution Source: Retrieved on June 8, 2012 from http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_archives/kropotkin/kropotlenindec20.html. Notes: From Selected Writings on Anarchism and Revolution, P.A. Kropotkin, edited and translated by Martin A. Miller.
Dmitrov (Moscow province)
21 December, 1920
Respected Vladimir Illich,
An announcement has been placed in Izvestiia and in Pravda which makes
known the decision of the Soviet government to seize as hostages SRs
[Social Revolutionary party members] from the Savinkov groups, White
Guards of the nationalist and tactical center, and [Pyotr] Wrangel
officers; and, in case of an [assassination] attempt on the leaders of
the soviets, to “mercilessly exterminate” these hostages.
Is there really no one around you to remind your comrades and to
persuade them that such measures represent a return to the worst period
of the Middle Ages and religious wars, and are undeserving of people who
have taken it upon themselves to create a future society on communist
principles? Whoever holds dear the future of communism cannot embark
upon such measures.
It is possible that no one has explained what a hostage really is? A
hostage is imprisoned not as punishment for some crime. He is held in
order to blackmail the enemy with his death. “If you kill one of ours,
we will kill one of yours.” But is this not the same thing as leading a
man to the scaffold each morning and taking him back, saying: “Wait
awhile, not today...”
And don’t your comrades understand that this is tantamount to a
restoration of torture for the hostages and their families.
I hope no one will tell me that people in power also do not lead easy
lives. Nowadays even among kings there are those who regard the
possibility of assassination as an “occupational hazard.”
And revolutionaries assume the responsibility of defending themselves
before a court which threatens their lives. Louise Michele chose this
way. Or they refuse to be persecuted, as did Malatesta and Voltairine de
Cleyre.
Even kings and popes have rejected such barbaric means of self-defense
as the taking of hostages. How can apostles of a new life and architects
of a new social order have recourse to such means of defense against
enemies?
Won’t this be regarded as a sign that you consider your communist
experiment unsuccessful, and [that] you are not saving the system that
is so dear to you but only [saving] yourselves?
Don’t your comrades realize that you, communists (despite the errors you
have committed), are working for the future? And that therefore you must
in no case stain your work by acts so close to primitive terror? [You
must know] that precisely these acts performed by revolutionaries in the
past make the new communist endeavors so difficult.
I believe that for the best of you, the future of communism is more
precious than your own lives. And thoughts about this future must compel
you to renounce such measures.
With all of its serious deficiencies (and I, as you know, see them
well), the October Revolution brought about enormous progress. It has
demonstrated that social revolution is not impossible, as people in
Western Europe had begun to think. And, for all its defects, it is
bringing about progress in the direction of equality, which will not be
corroded by attempts to return to the past.
Why, then, push the revolution on a path leading to its destruction,
primarily because of defects which are not at all inherent in socialism
or communism, but represent the survival of the old order and old
disturbances, of an unlimited, omnivorous authority?