💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › bernard-lazare-jewish-solidarity.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 08:01:33. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Jewish Solidarity
Author: Bernard Lazare
Date: October 1,1890
Language: en
Topics: religion, solidarity
Source: Retrieved on 2016-10-28 from http://marxists.architexturez.net/reference/archive/lazare-bernard/1890/jewish-solidarity.htm
Notes: Source: Entretiens Politiques et Litteraires, 1st year, No. 7, October 1,1890; Translated: for marxists.org by Mitch Abidor; CopyLeft: Creative Commons (Attribute & ShareAlike) marxists.org 2006.

Bernard Lazare

Jewish Solidarity

A propos of Russian Jewry, whose cause some French journalists took up

with too much ardor, or at the very least in too intemperate and

unjustifiable a fashion, Monsieur Paul de Cassagnac, in an excellent

article, said:

“Jewish writers here have an excellent occasion, by ceasing to

compromise the Russian alliance by their unjust diatribes, to prove –

what I have never doubted – that they are falsely accused and slandered

when they are reproached for being cosmopolitans and for only making a

mediocre – or at least secondary – case of what is commonly called the

fatherland.”

That recent affair and these words put in question that famous

solidarity of Israel that though once justifiable, wrongly persists

today. A definition is capable of characterizing it in the past and the

present: There was once an Israelite solidarity, there can now only be a

Jewish solidarity. The first can be excused and understood; as for the

second, I hope to demonstrate that it is founded on false principles and

that it constitutes a danger for the Israelites of France, the only ones

I am concerned with here.

For countless days the Hebrews, who bore in their souls their mourning

for sacked Judea, for Jerusalem destroyed, for the temple delivered to

flames, were subject to contempt, insults, and punishments. To be sure,

the prophets who called down upon Judas the fearsome fury of their God

as punishment for the evil ones who ruined him didn't dream up

misfortunes more horrible than those that overwhelmed him. When we read

its martyrology, as it was told in tears in the 16th century by the

Avigonnais Ha-Cohen, this martyrology which extends from Akiba torn

apart by iron tines, to the tortured of Ancona praying at the stake, and

to the heroes of Vitry who immolated themselves, one feels oneself

seized by sorrow. The Vale of Tears, such is the name of that book that

“resonated for the mourning...” and whose moving grandeur the tears of

the pastor of Chambrun, celebrating the proscribed Huguenots, doesn’t

reach. “I called it the ‘Vale of Tears’,” said the old chronicler,

descendant of sorrowful nabis, “for things are exactly as in the title:

whoever reads it will be breathless, tears will flow from his eyes and

his on his breast he will say: How long, my God, how long?” After

reading this one can understand how poignant must be the affliction of

these beings and how, in these difficult hours, they should band

together and feel themselves to be brothers. The ties that bind them

could only become stronger, the shared rancor of these disinherited

beings develop, become necessary. Who could they tell their sorrows and

joys to if not to themselves, since for centuries no one wanted to

listen to them. From these common desolations, from these tears was born

a suffering and intense fraternity. It pleased these abandoned ones,

mistreated all over Europe and who marched with their faces soiled with

spittle to feel Zion and its lost hills live again, to evoke – a supreme

and sweet consolation – the beloved banks of the Jordan and the Galilee:

this came about through a universal solidarity. They didn’t at all take

account of differences; it seemed to them that all those who bear the

name of Israel, and who were necessarily their friends, deserved their

tenderness. Thus was formed, in groans and oppressions, that alliance

which little by little, when the earth became more clement, came apart;

that alliance that clumsily inspired politicians have brought back to

life in our time, when it no longer has any raison d’etre.

Once the Jew knew that when he traveled he would only find shelter with

a Jew; if he were struck by illness only a Jew would fraternally assist

him; if he were to die far from his own, Jews alone could bury him

according to the rites, saying over his body the customary prayers. No

one condemns these necessary and just ties. The Israelites owe them

their indomitable courage; thanks to that mutual affection they were

able to resist implacable laws and deploy that marvelous energy that

saved them. Hunted, persecuted, they embraced each other with even more

love, and this preserved the tenderness and goodness that many among

them have rediscovered, at the same time as they have forgotten the

tortures. Are there today many Protestants who hold onto the rancor

caused by the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre and the Dragonnades? Not

any more than there are Israelites who remember Philippe-le-Bel.

And yet in 1860 a man, with a mediocre intelligence and of questionable

politics, dreaming of I know not what gaonate, sought to bring this

solidarity back to life and organize it. I am speaking of Monsieur

Crémieux and the Alliance Israélite Universelle. I have no need here of

concerning myself with this man; perhaps later I will go into his role,

which I consider detestable; I can perhaps say that he doesn’t deserve

the admiration and respect he is given by French Israelites, and that he

did great evil when, in the midst of his countries reverses, he thought

only of the emancipation of Algerian Jewry, sordid usurers worthy of

contempt and not pity, thus provoking insurrection and war.

I come now to the Alliance. Founded in 1860 over the last forty years it

has expanded greatly. It is led by a Central Committee, and by regional

and Local Committees. In the words of one of its members, it seeks the

moral unity of Israel; its watches for and prevents – insofar as it can

– the oppression of Jews in “backwards countries.” It is neither English

nor French nor German: it is Jewish. On what basis is it founded?

Is it on a religious basis? I have already spoken of the lack of faith

of modern Israelites. In any event, I don’t see the necessity for an

International in order to affirm your beliefs. Mohammedans, spread

across many countries, don’t act in this way and yet among them Allah

and Mohammed are adored with as much energy, or even more, than Jehovah

and Moses elsewhere. Are they not mistreated in certain countries, you

might ask? Yes, but they don’t feel the need to defend co-religionaries

who are foreign to them. In any case, the Jews of Russia and Romania,

are they molested because of their religion? It would be naïve to defend

such a thesis. The theological tie is insufficient in explaining the

Alliance. It is thus based on race, and so becomes false and dangerous.

One of the most generally established errors, one of the dogmas admitted

by all those who have shown an interest in Semites, is their so-called

stability, the ethnic persistence of the Israelites. To listen to most

of these historians, they have remained what they were at the time of

the Roman conquest. Nothing could be less true than this assertion. The

only thing that has persisted is something that has not been noticed:

it’s the eternal division of the Hebrew tribes, attested to by the

profound symbol of the Golden Calf. Two fractions, almost two nations

constantly confront each other with every step of the exodus, on every

date in history. One simple and pure, adoring with a profound piety the

God that its genius conquered, by the mouth of whose prophets pure law

was given and the powerful and the rich anathematized. The other

eternally perverse, prostrating itself before the idols Kamosch,

Milchom, or Aschera, preaching in support of luxury and wealth, sister

in this to Tyre and Sidon, which were cursed by Isaiah and Jeremiah. It

will later produce evil pontiffs and dry doctors; it will suffocate the

flower of poetry that lay in the soul of the prodigious singer who sang

the lamentations of Job, of that other who sighed of the abduction of

the Shulamite and, becoming dominant, will render Israel an object of

abomination when the greater part of it is worthy of respect. It alone

will be seen, for it will lead this unfortunate people, and the image of

captives on the banks of enemy rivers, of indomitable and worthy heroes

– incarnated by Samson – the memory of the glorious soldiers who

resisted Rome and who buried themselves in the city in flames, all of

this will disappear. It will no longer be known, or at least it will no

longer be said, that those who were called “warriors of God” – Israel –

were not a horde of greedy traffickers and vile usurers. And it is of

this duality that I am speaking, for they still exist, despite the

transformations, the allies of Tyre and Sidon, cursed by the inspired;

they still exist, the defenders and henchmen of the nabis, and yet the

Jewish nation is dead.

Take a Jew from China, a B’nei Israel from Hindustan, a Polish or

Russian Jew, a German Jew, A Spanish Jew, or a French, an Italian, an

Algerian Jew, an Abyssinian Jew; put them one next to the other and see

if a serious ethnologist could draw from this exhibit the theory of a

permanent race that is so complacently professed. That this Celestial,

this Hindu, this Hun, this Kalmuk, this Negro and this half-Latin have

points of contact is undeniable – we can find them between a Samoyed and

a Parisian – but what is especially palpable and obvious are the

divergences.

Let us consider just the Europeans. Between a lorgnette merchant of

Frankfurt – this lorgnette merchant who is the inevitable chrysalis of a

journalist or a stock market agent, if not of a politician – and the

humblest of Jewish shop owners of France or Italy, and I’m not speaking

of those who were naturalized: the most violent anti-Semites have

themselves noted the difference, entirely to the advantage of the latter

group. How did these differences come about? The Israelist, who they

like to show as perpetually withdrawn into himself, holding his

neighbors in horror and refusing to mix with them was, on the contrary,

always devoured by proselytism; and by generally attributing to him the

idea of his confining himself to closed off practices and scrupulously

reserved rites, they formulate the doctrine of the Pharisees and the

Talmudists, who were often fought against but who, alas, emerged

victorious in the 18th Century. The Essenes, those communists preaching

the contempt of worldly goods, living ascetically in the candor of

perpetual prayer, these Essenes, persecuted by Phariseeism traversed the

Orient in order to spread their doctrine. In Rome their proselytism was

so ardent that in 538 the Republic expelled them. The measure was

temporary, and in Imperial Rome we see them attracting matrons and

slaves. The number of these God-fearers was considerable, and the

situation was the same in Alexandria, as attested to by Philo. It was

among these Judaizers that nascent Christianity conquered souls with

such ease. Is not one of the most striking evidences of this propaganda

the apostle Saint Paul? With the arrival of Christianity these

tendencies did not weaken. From this time on in every country the Jews

lived they Judaized, and thus mixed, and foreign elements were

incorporated into them. What was then produced? In certain cases the mix

of nationalities was favorable, in others not. The great separation of

European Israelites is the proof of this: the German Jews (Ashkenazim)

and the Portuguese Jews (Sephardim), the former in the German Empire,

Austria, Poland, Russia; the latter in Spain, Portugal, France, England

and Holland. Some colonies even crossed the Rhine, notably in Hamburg.

To believe that this division is founded on an arbitrary geographic

factor would be an error: rather it is based on profound differences in

ethnic constitution, in character, and in morality. The Portuguese, who

allied themselves with peoples of the Latin race (those in Holland and

England come from émigrés) belong to the type that the anthropologists

call dolicocephalic. The Germans, who it would be more correct to call

the Tatar, belong to the brachycephalic type. In the first centuries of

our era he met with the great lirachycephalic emigration, and the

Caucasus was the center of the fusion. It is also there that we find the

greatest number of documents for the studying of these transformations.

The Jews established in Anape, in Olbia and the surrounding areas

converted the Uro-Altaic peoples to Judaism, and the memory of the most

powerful of these tribes that became Israelites has been preserved in

history: the kingdom of the Khazars. The Hebraic element, sustained by

currents arriving from Baghdad and Jerusalem, mixed with the Huns and

Kalmuks. It was thus that that hybrid and small yet noble race was

formed that, in the Sixth century, invaded Russia and then Poland and

Germany, submerging in its passage the purer Semitic groups. As for the

Jews of the south, in Rome itself, from which many left to found

settlements in Europe, they had assimilated to themselves men of the

people, the fearful, who, sensing the arrival of a new day, tired of a

polytheism that left their hearts thirsty and their hearts empty, and so

they went over to the jealous God. In Spain and France the repeated

prohibitions of the Councils of the Fourth to the Seventh centuries bear

witness to how numerous mixed marriages were. It should not be forgotten

that upon their arrival in these countries the Jews found themselves in

the presence of pagan populations, and perhaps they were on the

peninsula before Jesus Christ. The Semitic type predominated among them;

they are most often quite large, the nose firmly outlined, their hair

fine and curly, the eyes beautiful. The German is generally small, with

pale skin, he has dirty red hair, or dirty yellow as is the case in

Bohemia, a sparse beard and a distracted gaze. In the lower classes in

Poland, Russia, and Galicia and among the ghettos of Germany, one finds

oneself in the presence of an unwashed being, in tattered clothes, of a

viscous and repugnant aspect, speaking a bizarre idiom, a Judeo-German

patois. Look now at the smallest Israelite peddler of a Provencal

village: in costume, language and attitude he is the same as the

peasants of the different confessions that surround him. The German is

vain, ignorant, greedy, low, groveling, insolent. Cerf Beer of

Medelsheim, who knew them well, said this in 1847. He has never produced

anything, if not clippings of ducats, tunesmiths, vaudevillians of a

doubtful intelligence, vague chroniclers. If some, like Heine, have

stood out, then likely they were descendants of Spanish émigrés, of

those who, expelled in 1492, took refuge in the countries of the Rhine:

Heine’s appearance, his air of a young God, the purity of his features

seems to prove this. As for the Portuguese, before the Babylonian or

German Talmudists broke their spirit and abolished the independence of

their thought they developed and flourished in a very high civilization.

Of a proud allure and a purified taste they feels reborn in their hearts

the poetical soul of their forefathers, of those who told the touching

stories of Ruth and Suzanne. They always held the Germans in contempt,

and the Germans gave them hatred in return: as recently as forty years

ago a Portuguese or Comtadin Israelite would not have wanted to ally

himself with a Prussian Jew. In Spain the Jews were detested, not held

in contempt: at the battle of Zalaca 40,000 fought with Alfonso VI of

Castille, and the skillful lance blows given and received rendered them

capable of elevated thoughts. It is the same in southern France. And so

they don’t deserve the just disdain felt for the Germans and Russians,

those semi-Huns and semi-Tatars. They didn’t take on those vile

attitudes that are still assumed today by the usurer of a Polish hamlet

when he receives a blow with a riding crop. And let it not be said that

the intellectual and morale debasement of these Ashkenazim, that their

inability to produce literarily and scientifically are caused by their

repeated proscriptions and martyrdoms, since in Poland, where they lived

for many years under a favorable domination, they produced nothing but

false, dried out, detestable Talmudic literature. Those unfortunates,

for whom we must feel the pity owed to those who suffer, but not any

kind of esteem, have remained under the rule of narrow old rabbis who

imposed upon them a ridiculous dialectic, forever striking their brains

– already consecrated to decrepitude- with imbecility. It was in vain

that in Germany larger spirits wanted to tear them from these evils: in

vain did Mendelsohn and the editors of the Measef attempt this; they

only succeeded in converting their children to Christianity, who came to

this from disgust with those who surrounded them.

External circumstances, the influence of the milieu, historical causes,

and the climate don’t suffice to explain such differences in beings

issued from the same social stratum. Only modifications due to mixing, a

change in constitution, a modification in the cerebral substance justify

them, and we can say that the pure Jewish race no longer exists, except

among a handful of Karaites, and even this is not proven.

Russian Jews and French Jews, German Jews, English Jews and Polish Jews

are separated by the same distances that separate Slavs from Germans,

Latins, and Saxons. This being so, the second reason that the Alliance

Israélite Universelle can invoke, and which is in reality its primary

reason, disappears and cannot be sustained. Nevertheless, let us

understand each other! You Israelites, you protest when you are told:

you have no fatherland; you are vagabonds who have stopped for a moment.

You reject- and often sincerely – these accusations and, on the word of

people having an interest in this arbitrary assimilation you accept as

brothers people who, amongst themselves have as much resemblance as a

Fuegian and a Hottentot. What do they matter to me, a French Israelite,

those Russian usurers, Galician money lenders, Polish horse merchants,

stock jobbers of Prague and money changers of Frankfurt? By virtue of

what so-called fraternity am I to be concerned by measures taken by the

Czar towards subjects who seem to him to do harm? Should I, in defending

them, in supporting them, assume a part of their responsibility? What do

I have in common with the descendants of Huns? If they suffer I have for

them the natural pity due to all those who suffer, whoever they might

be, since on earth punishment is always disproportionate to the crime.

But if they were to adore Jehovah three times and venerate Moses ten

times I wouldn’t feel my sympathy grow for all that; the Christians of

Crete also have the right to move me, as would so many others who are

pariahs on this globe without being Israelites. And besides, what does

such an association lead to? To welcoming among us contemptible beings,

to helping them, favoring them, implanting them in a soil that isn’t

theirs and which shouldn’t nourish them, in facilitating their conquest.

Who does this serve? The cosmopolitan Jew who has ties to no nation,

affection for none, who is a Bedouin transporting his tent with complete

indifference. It is precious to the sons of Kalmuk invaders, most of

them vile and predatory, for those Talmudists who, according to the

words of Ernest Renan, are “unsociable, strangers everywhere, without a

country, without any interest but that of their sect, plagues on the

countries where fate has carried them.” It serves the Jews of whom I

have spoken, who find among them valiant recruits for evil, faithful

acolytes without prejudices and without morals, ignorant and holding in

contempt a law that isn’t theirs. Bankers will find there the courtiers

and straw men they need, the journalists, the blackmailers, the

provocateurs that are necessary to them; the politicians will find the

unscrupulous electoral agents, the perverters of consciences so useful

to their goals. And these courtiers, these provocateurs, these agents

will in their turn, by a dynastic and serious vocation, become the

bankers, the journalists, the politicians of tomorrow.

To whom is the Alliance harmful? To the Israelites of France who are

duped and dishonored by their so-called brothers. What also occurs? Open

an anti-Semitic book to any page and you will hear shouted – and justly

so most of the time – words against the Frankfurters, the Galicians, the

Romanians, the Russians who are descending upon us like grasshoppers.

The Israelites of France suffer from their depredations, their

immorality, their lack of faith, their indifference to the public good.

Thanks to these hordes with which we are confused it is forgotten that

we have inhabited France for almost two thousand years; two thousand

years, like those Franks who invaded this country and made of it a

fatherland: the ancient Hebrews didn’t tread the land they defended with

such well-known energy for as long a time as this. And yet, when one has

spent twenty centuries in a country, when one has prospered there and

suffered loved, profound ties form and nothing can break them. French

Israelites have buried many of their fathers in France; the very blood

they have spilled there, this blood that militates in their favor and

must redeem many faults, this blood ties them even more to the soil that

receives it, and this soil, they have defended it and they will defend

it again, for it is their soil. Some polemicists, sometimes

ill-inspired, cry: Gaul for the Gauls! If Gaul were only for the Gauls

it would certainly belong to few people. Others say: Long Live the

French Race! But this French race, how many different races have

cooperated in forming it? Do we know how many molecules a nation is

composed of? Did the Gauls not energetically fight the Franks who

despoiled them? And does anyone believe that the Goths, the Romans, the

Avars, and the Germans left nothing in this country that they inhabited

one after the other?

If the Jewish religion, that religion that is crumbling, decomposing,

and falling into ruin were to disappear along with the external

practices that alone preserve it today, in a hundred years the Jewish

element would be so incorporated into the elements that surround it that

we would no more recognize the Israelite than we do the Visigoth

existing in a few Frenchmen. In any case, what I want to proclaim is

that we have nothing in common with those constantly thrown in our face,

and that we should abandon them. In place of that stupid and false

solidarity preached by the Alliance Universelle we should ourselves

expel them from among us when they are tainted. “If your hand or your

foot is an occasion for your fall, cut it off and throw it far from

you,” said the gospel. Philo said this too. Let French Israelites at

least listen to Philo, let them put this in practice, especially when

this hand and foot are illegitimately grafted on to them. Otherwise let

them be on their guard: one possibly distant day they will be included

in an anathema gone astray.

Let the Israelites of France retire then from the Alliance Israélite

Universelle – the head rabbi first, for it is inappropriate for him to

play at pope, having neither national nor theological right to it. If

they can cooperate in its abolition it must be done; their consistories

and their communities amply suffice for their religious needs (as long

as a Jew has a synagogue he can go to on Saturday to chat about his

affairs while the un-listened to prayers reverberate around him his soul

is satisfied). Let him leave those of Russia, Poland, and Germany to

unite amongst themselves: that’s their affair. As for the moral

regeneration of the Jews of these nations, let those who govern them

take care of this if they think it necessary. If they think they can use

this large force let them educate their Jews by tearing them from the

grips of the Talmudists who deform and pollute them. On the part of

French Israelites it would be more normal to stop, to dam if they can,

the perpetual immigration of these predatory, crude and filthy Tatars

who come unjustifiably graze in a country not theirs. This is what they

should do instead of welcoming them to their own detriment.