💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › the-politics-of-bigotry.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 14:22:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: The Politics of Bigotry
Author: Nick S.
Date: September 18, 1999
Language: en
Topics: migration, refugees, civil war, former Yugoslavia, totalitarian state, the State, Freedom
Source: Scanned from FREEDOM vol. 60, #18, September 18, 1999, page 1

Nick S.

The Politics of Bigotry

On the weekend of 14-15th August, after months of provocations by the

local media, small groups of local residents in Dover clashed with

asylum-seekers at a funfair. The Dover Express had been telling locals

for so long that their town was over-run with immigrants that someone

was bound to bite eventually. Home Office minister Lord Bassan

immediately asserted that the town was indeed 'overcrowded' and that New

Labour's draconian powers of dispersal (under the proposed Asylum and

Immigration Bill) were—entirely coincidentally—the only solution! Never

mind that Dover has a population of over 30,000 and that the refugee

population's access to local resources is minimal. Immigrants, as ever,

provide a convenient scapegoat. Dover's economy has been wrecked by the

closure of the Kent coal mines, redundancies on the ferries and the loss

of construction jobs on the completion of the Channel Tunnel. Blaming

asylum-seekers for the flight of capital from the area is an easy means

of deflecting local anger away from those directly to blame.

Not content with the victimisation of those forced to flee NATO's

destruction of the Balkans, Home Secretary Jack Straw cast around for a

new target, and used an interview with BBC Radio West Midlands to attack

travellers. "Many of these so-called travellers seem to think that it's

perfectly okay for them to cause mayhem in an area, to go burgling,

thieving, breaking into vehicles, causing all kinds of trouble,

including defecating in the doorways of firms and so on and getting away

with it.” Straw's comments were combined with moves to introduce visa

restrictions for Czech nationals, and were clearly intended to generate

racist hysteria aimed at Roma asylum-seekers. Czech gypsies endure 70%

unemployment in their homeland, as a direct result of workplace racism.

Over twenty Roma have been murdered by far right groups in

Czechoslovakia since 1990. According to Straw, though, they're 'bogus

asylum-seekers'. Gypsies have been used by the Czech government as

scapegoats for crime, housing shortages and cuts in benefits. Trying to

find sanctuary, they're destined to serve the same ends here.

In 1993 the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR)

described refugees as "the symptom of the ills of an age.” An average of

nearly ten thousand people each day are forced to become refugees. In a

world population of 5.5 billion, roughly one in every 130 people on

earth has been forced into flight. For all the talk within Europe of an

'asylum crisis', some 24 million people are displaced within the borders

of their own countries and, as the UNHCR makes clear, the vast majority

of refugees sought and found sanctuary in neighbouring third world

countries, and returned home when conditions permitted.

In 1993 a UNHCR report states simply: "What sets refugees apart from

other people in need of humanitarian aid is their need for international

protection. Most people can look to their own governments and state

institutions to protect their rights and physical security, even if

imperfectly. Refugees cannot. In many cases they are fleeing in terror

from abuses perpetrated by the state." All this is absented from any

discussion in the media about the 'asylum crisis.’ New Labour has chosen

to provide tax breaks for big business rather than allocate increased

resources to public spending. When classroom numbers increase, hospital

waiting lists are fiddled and benefits cut, some kind of smokescreen is

inevitably needed to deflect popular anger from the real culprits. New

Labour has chosen to do what every other Labour government has done—it

has played the race card. The end result is that people who are fleeing

for their lives may well end up paying with their lives because the only

'conviction politics' Blair's 'Christian' government has left is the

politics of bigotry.

The UNHCR has described the "impulse to provide refuge to strangers in

need" as "one of the most basic expressions of human solidarity.” In

practice, what the Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares as

"the right to seek and enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution"

(Article 14 [1]) is in practice subject to the ideological twists of

governments committed not to 'human solidarity' but to avarice and the

preservation of privilege. In 1918 fifteen thousand White Russian

refugees were allowed into Britain while Jews and Armenians were

deliberately excluded. During the Cold War the West condemned Eastern

European states for their denial of freedom of movement to their

populations. The Hungarian government was pressured to open its borders

with Austria in 1989, creating a route for East Germans into the West.

The steady haemorrhage to the West was then used to undermine the

stability of the East European states. During 1989 alone some 1.2

million people left the Warsaw Pact area. Once the destabilisation of

the state capitalist regimes was underway, the attitude of the Western

states to the right of freedom of movement of Eastern European citizens

was redefined—Italy deployed troops to deter Albanian asylum-seekers,

while Austria used its army to keep out Roma gypsies.

In their magnificent history of global refugee movements, Refugees in an

Age of Genocide (Frank Cass, 1999), Tony Kushner and Katherine Knox note

that "it is all the more remarkable, and one cause for qualified

optimism, that popular attachment to the concept of asylum has in the

last years of the century remained strong in spite of the atmosphere

created by successive governments and the popular press.” In 1991 The

Sun carried out a survey of its readers, and found out (doubtless to its

horror) that half of the sample stated that they did not want the

government to "turn its back on our tradition of giving haven to

refugees.” In a more detailed survey carried out in 1997 by the

Institute of Public Policy Research, three-quarters agreed that "most

refugees in Britain are in need of our help and support.”

Those of us committed to a world based on what Bakunin called the "real

union of free peoples" need to be in the forefront of the defence of the

right to asylum, and the physical defence of those seeking refuge. The

UNHCR, though, notes that "global migration proceeds across a spectrum

of motivation, ranging from those who flee from persecution to those who

flee from serious danger, those who are trying to escape from misery and

those who wish to leave behind a lack of opportunity.” The World Bank,

the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and General Agreement of Tariffs

and Trade (GATT) exist ostensibly to help developing countries, but in

reality do no more than facilitate the freedom of capital to exploit

labour and natural resources across the globe. Free movement of labour,

though, is denounced as 'bogus' (the spectre of the exploited beginning

to exploit the exploiter?) and those seeking a new life are criminalised

for not knowing their place. As a German refugee group, Die Karawane,

note: "This contradiction is most apparent at the USMexico border or at

the eastern frontiers of the EU, where the military clampdown on illegal

migration ensures that reserve pools of cheap labour are preserved on

the edges of affluent US and Europe" (CARF no. 51, Aug/Sept 1999).

In 1652 the Digger activist Gerard Winstanley raised the call for the

battle to "take the earth to be a common treasury.” That battle still

remains to be won. If we are to rebuild a movement fit for the task, we

have to defend the right of freedom of movement of labour—for all people

to seek opportunity where they can. Racism is, in part, an ideological

prop of the ruling class which is used to set those with least to gain

in this society against each other. It is, further, the cultural trace

of the determination of capital that we should all know our place in

this world—and that place shall be defined by borders drawn up by those

who see us as no more than cheap labour, a resource to be exhausted like

every other resource. As A. Sivanandan observed in 1990, "today the

colour line is the poverty line is the power line ... that is why you

cannot fight racism without also fighting imperialism. You cannot fight

for the cause of black people without fighting for the cause of working

people. You cannot, in the final analysis, fight oppression without at

the same time fighting exploitation" (Communities of Resistance, Verso,

1990).

In The Origins of Totalitarianism (Allen & Unwin, 1958), Hannah Arendt

is drawn to comment that "contemporary history has created a new kind of

human being—the kind that are put in concentration camps by their foes

and internment camps by their friends.” For us, then, our attempts to

make a different history have to begin with the need to save the

refugees of today from the internment camps which the likes of Jack

Straw would have as their fate again.