💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › manuel-gonzalez-prada-our-indians.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 12:42:18. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Our Indians
Author: Manuel González Prada
Date: 1904
Language: en
Topics: indigenous, Indian, Indian Sovereignty, racism, colonialism
Source: Retrieved on march 2021 from https://evergreen.loyola.edu/tward/www/gp/english/Indians.htm
Notes: “Nuestros indios” did not become part of Horas de lucha until the second edition in 1924. Manuel González Prada, “Nuestros Indios”, Horas de lucha. Second edition (Callao: Tip. Lux, 1924, pp. 311–338); Translation: Harold Eugene Davis, “Our Indians,” Latin American Social Thought (Washington: The University Press of Washington, 1961), pp. 196–208. For original footnotes, please consult Davis’ original text. The editor has slightly modernized this translation as well as cleared up a few ambiguities. Prepared for WWW by Dawn DeLeonardis.

Manuel González Prada

Our Indians

I

The most eminent sociologists consider sociology a science in formation

and call for the advent of its Newton, its Lavoisier, or its Lyell. Yet

no other works pullulate such dogmatic and arbitrary assertions as those

produced by the heirs and disciples of Comte. [1] One might call

sociology not only the art of giving new names to old things but also

the science of contradictory assertions. If one great sociologist

announces a proposition, we may be certain that another no less great

sociologist will advocate the diametric opposite. Just as some

pedagogues remind us of the teachers of [Eugene] Scribe, so many

sociologists make us think of the physicians of Moliere — Le Bon [2] and

Tarde are not far from Diafoirus and PurgĂłn.

We might mention the question of race as one upon which the authors

differ most. While some see it in the principle factor of social

dynamics, others reduce ethnic influences to so small a scope that they

say with Durkheim: “We know no social phenomenon which falls

unquestionably under dependence upon race.” [3] Novicow, in spite of

considering the opinion of Durkheim exaggerated, does not hesitate to

assert that race, like species, is to a certain point a subjective

category of our spirit, without external reality; and in a generous

burst of humanity he exclaims: “All those pretended incapacities of the

yellow and the black people are chimeras of sick spirits.” Whoever dares

say to a race, “Thus far you may come and no farther,” is blind and

stupid.

How convenient an invention ethnology is in the hands of some men! If

one grants the division of humanity into superior and inferior races and

recognizes the superiority of the whites and their consequent right to

govern the planet, nothing is more natural than the suppression of the

Black in Africa, the Redskin in the United States, the Tagalog in the

Philippines, or the Indian in Peru. Since the supreme law of life is

fulfilled in the selection or elimination of the weak and unadaptable,

the violent eliminators and suppressors are merely accelerating the slow

and indolent labor of Nature. They abandon the pace of the tortoise for

the gallop of the horse. Many, like Pearson, do not write it but allow

it to be read between the lines, as when he refers to the “solidarity

among civilized man of the European race against Nature and human

barbarism.” Where you read “human barbarism,” it is to be translated

“man without white skin.”

But not only is the suppression of black and yellow people decreed.

Within the white race itself, classifications are made of peoples

destined to live and prosper and peoples condemned to decline and die.

Since Demolins published his book A quoi tient la supériorité des

Anglo-Saxons, the fashion has been revived of glorifying the Anglo

Saxons and depreciating the Latins. (Although few Latins can really be

called so — for example can Atahualpa be called Galician, or Montezuma,

Provençal?) [4] In Europe and America we see many Cassandras flourishing

who live by prophesying the conflagration and destruction of the New

Troy. Some pessimists, believing themselves the Deucalions of the next

deluge or even the Supermen of Nietzsche, decree the disappearance of

their own race as if dealing with prehistoric beings or inhabitants of

the Moon. It has not been formulated, but an axiom follows [from this].

Crimes and vices of the English and the North Americans are things

inherent in the human species and do not forecast the decline of a

people. On the other hand, crimes and vices of the French or Italians

are anomalies and indicate racial degeneration. Fortunately Oscar Wilde

and General MacDonald were not born in Paris and the round table of the

Emperor William was not held in Rome.

It seems unnecessary to say that we do not take seriously dilettanti

like Paul Bourget nor mystifiers like Maurice Barrès when they thunder

against cosmopolitanism and weep over the decadence of the noble French

race because the daughter of a syphilitic count and a consumptive

marquise allows herself to be seduced by a healthy and vigorous youth

without a noble pedigree. In respect to Monsieur Gustave Le Bon, we

should admire him for his very vast knowledge and his great moral

elevation, even though he represents an exaggeration of Spencer, much as

max Nordau does of Lombroso and Haeckel of Darwin. He deserves to be

called the Bossuet of Sociology, but that is not to say the Torquemada

or the Herod. If he had not made himself worthy of consideration by his

observations upon occult matters (sobre la luz negra) we might say that

he is to a sociology what doctor Sangrado [the ignorant physician of Gil

Blas] is to medicine.

Le Bon warns us not in any way to take the term race in an

anthropological sense, because pure races have long since almost

disappeared, except among savage peoples. And to give us a secure road

to march on, he decides: “Among civilized people there are only

historical events.” According to the Le Bon’s dogma, Hispanic American

nations constitute one of these races, but a race so exceptional that it

has passed dizzily from childhood to decrepitude, covering in less than

a century the course run by other peoples in three, four, five, and even

six thousand years. “The twenty-two Latin American republics of

America,” he says in his Psichologie du socialisme, “although all

situated in the richest regions of the Globe, are incapable of

developing their immense resources.... The final destiny of that half of

America is to return to primitive barbarism unless the United States do

it the great service of conquering it.... To debase the richest regions

of the Globe to the level of the black republics of Santo Domingo and

Haiti, this is what the Latin race has accomplished in less than a

century with half of America.” [5]

It might be argued with Le Bon that he mistakes the skin eruption of a

child for the senile gangrene of a nonagenarian, the hebephrenia of a

youth for the homicidal mania of an old man. Since when do revolutions

indicate decrepitude and death? None of the Hispanic American nations

today displays the political and social misery which reigned in the

Europe of feudalism. But the feudal epoch is considered a stage in

evolution, whereas the era of Hispanic American revolutions is looked

upon as an incurable, final state. We might also answer by confronting

Le Bon the pessimist with Le Bon the optimist, [pitting] as one might

say St. Augustine the Bishop against St. Augustine the pagan. “It is

possible ,” affirms Le Bon, “that after a series of profound calamities,

convulsions almost never seen in history,” the Latin peoples, taught by

experience, “may attempt the arduous task of acquiring the qualities

they lack in order henceforth to achieve success in life.... Apostles

can accomplish much because they succeed in changing public opinion, and

public opinion is queen today.... History is so full of the unforeseen,

the world is undergoing such profound changes, that it is impossible

today to foresee the destiny of empires.” If it is impossible to foresee

the fate of nations, how then announce the death of the Hispanic

American republics? What the Latin Empires can achieve in Europe, may

not the nations of similar origin attempt in the New World? Or are there

two sociological laws, one for the Latins of America and another for the

Latins of Europe? Perhaps. But happily, the assertions of Le Bon

resemble nails which drive out each other.

It appears, then, that while August Comte intended to make of sociology

an eminently positive science, his heirs have converted it into a heap

of ramblings without any scientific basis.

II

In his Der Rassenkamph (Race Conflict) Ludwig Gumplowicz says that every

important and powerful ethnic element seeks to make serve its ends any

weak element found in its radius or which penetrates into it. [6] First

the Conquerors and then their descendants in the countries of America

constituted an ethnic element sufficiently powerful to subjugate and

exploit the indigenes. Although the statements of Las Casas are marred

by exaggeration, it cannot be denied that in some American countries,

thanks to the avaricious cruelty of the exploiters, the weak element was

almost extinguished. The ants which domesticate grubs in order to milk

them do not imitate the lack of foresight of the whites-they do not

destroy the productive animal.

To the theory of Gumplowicz should be added a law which has great

influence in our way of life-when an individual rises above the level of

his social class he usually becomes its worst enemy. During the time of

black slavery there were no crueler overseers than the Blacks

themselves. At the present time there are probably no harsher oppressors

of the Indian than those very Indians who are Hispanicized and invested

with some authority.

The real tyrant of the masses, who uses certain Indians to exploit and

oppress the others, is the half-caste, including in this term not only

the cholo or mestizo of the sierra but also the mulatto and zambo of the

coast. [7] In Peru we see an ethnic stratification. Excluding Europeans

and the small number of national or Creole whites, the population is

divided into two parts, very unequal in quantity, the dominating

half-castes and the dominated indigenes. One or two hundred thousand

persons have been placed over three millions.

There is a real offensive and defensive alliance based on exchange of

services between the dominant group of the capital and those of the

province. The political bosses (gamonal) of the sierra act as political

agents for the overlords in Lima, and the overlords of Lima defend the

political bosses of the sierra when they barbarously abuse the Indian.

Few social groups have committed such iniquities or have such a black

record as the Spaniards and half-castes of Peru. Revolutions,

squandering, and bankruptcy seem like nothing compared with the glacial

cupidity of the half-castes to squeeze the blood out of human flesh. The

suffering and death of their fellow creatures matters very little to

them when that suffering and death yields them a gain of a few soles.

[8] They decimate the Indian with their assessments and forced labor

(mitas); [9] they import the Black to make him groan under the lash of

the overseer; they swallow up the Chinese, giving him a handful of rice

for ten and even fifteen hours of work; they bring the East Indian from

his islands to let him die of nostalgia in the slave quarters of the

haciendas; today they are trying to bring in Japanese.... The Black

seems to decline [in numbers], the Chinese is disappearing, the East

Indian has left no trace, and the Japanese gives no sign of lending

himself to slavery. But the Indian remains, since three hundred to four

hundred years of cruelty have not succeeded in exterminating him. The

vile creature obstinately insists on living!

The viceroys of Peru never failed to condemn the violations nor spared

any effort to achieve the protection, good treatment, and relief of the

Indians. The Kings of Spain, yielding to the compassion of their noble

and Catholic souls, conceived humanitarian measures and backed those

initiated by the viceroys. There were more than enough fine proposals in

royal cedulas. We do not know whether the Laws of the Indies formed a

pyramid as tall as Chimborazo, but we know the evil continued unchanged,

even though some were punished as examples. And it could not be

otherwise. The exploitation of the conquered was officially ordered, but

humanity and justice were asked of the executors of the exploitation. It

was pretended that it was possible to commit iniquities humanely and to

carry out injustice with equity. To stamp out the abuses it would have

been necessary to stamp out the repartimientos and mitas, in a word, to

change the whole colonial regime. Without the forced labor (faenas of

the American Indian the coffers of the Spanish treasury would have been

empty. The wealth sent by the colonies to the Metropolis was merely

blood and tears converted into gold.

The Republic continues the tradition of the viceroyalty. In their

messages the presidents urge the redemption of the oppressed and they

are called protectors of the native race. Congresses elaborate laws

which go beyond the Declaration of the Rights of Man, the ministers of

government issue decrees, send notes to the prefects, and appoint

investigating commissions, all with the noble purpose of assuring

guaranties to the disinherited class. But messages, laws, decrees,

notes, and commissions are nothing more than hypocritical jeremiads,

fruitless words, and overworked measures. The authorities who send

threatening orders from Lima to the departments know they will not be

obeyed. The perfects who receive the warnings from the Capital know that

nothing will happen to them for not carrying them out. What the Marquis

of Mancera said in his Memoria in 1648 could be repeated today, reading

governors and hacienda owners for corregidores and caciques. “These poor

Indians have as their enemies the greediness of their corregidores, of

their priests, and of their caciques, all trying to grow rich on their

sweat; it would take the zeal and authority of a viceroy for each of

them. Relying upon the distance [from authority] they falsely pretend

obedience and there is not enough strength or perseverance to register a

second complaint.” The phrase falsely pretending obedience has great

significance in the mouth of a viceroy. But even more significant is the

statement which escaped from the defenders of the Indians of Chucuito.

There are many friends of the Indian who in their individual and

collective capacities behave like the government in its official action.

The groups formed to free the unredeemed race have been no better than

political contrabandists, hiding behind a philanthropic banner.

Defending the Indian, they have exploited the public pity as others have

traded on patriotism by invoking Tacna and Arica. For the redeemers to

act in good faith they would have to experience an overnight

transformation, repenting the terrible measure of their sins,

formulating a steady purpose of obeying the dictates of justice,

becoming men of tigers. Is this conceivable?

Meanwhile, as a general rule, the dominant group approach the Indian

only to deceive him, oppress him, or corrupt him. And we should remember

that not only the national half-caste acts with inhumanity and bad

faith. When Europeans become wool traders, mine owners, or hacienda

proprietors, they show themselves fine exactors, extortionists, rivaling

the old encomenderos and the present day hacendados. The white skinned

animal, wherever he is born, is afflicted with the disease of gold. In

the final analysis he yields to the instinct of rapacity.

III

Does the Indian suffer less under the republic than under Spanish rule?

While neither corregimientos nor encomiendas exist, forced labor and its

recruitment remain. What we make him suffer is enough to call down upon

us the execration of humanity. We hold him in ignorance and servitude,

we debase him in the garrisons, we brutalize him with alcohol, we set

him to destroying himself in civil war, and from time to time we

organize hunting parties and massacres like those of Amantani, Ilave,

and Haunta.

It is an unwritten axiom that the Indian has no rights, only

obligations. In his case a personal complaint is considered

insubordination, a collective claim, a plot of rebellion. The Spanish

royalists killed the Indian when he tried to escape the yoke of his

conquerors; we republicans exterminate him when he protests against

onerous taxes or tires of enduring in silence the iniquities of some

satrap.

Our form of government is in essence a great lie, because a state in

which two or three million individuals live outside the law does not

deserve to be called a democratic republic. While in the coastal region

one sees a shadow of protection under a feigned republic, in the

interior the violation of all rights under a feudal regime is open. Here

neither laws nor courts of justice rule, because hacienda owners and

political bosses (gamonales) settle everything, arrogating to themselves

the role of judge as well as executor. The political authorities, far

from protecting the weak and the poor, almost always help the strong and

the rich. There are regions where justices of the peace and [provincial]

governors are servitors of the hacienda. What governor, what

sub-prefect, what prefect, even, would dare oppose a hacienda owner?

A hacienda consists of small farms taken by force from their rightful

owners. A landlord exercises the authority of a Norman baron over his

peons. He not only influences the selection of governors, mayors, and

justices of the peace, but also arranges marriages, designates heirs,

divides up inheritances, and imposes what is frequently a life-long

servitude upon children to pay the debts of their parents. He imposes

punishments that are terrible such as shackles, flogging, stocks, and

death; or are ridiculous, such as shaving the head and cold-water

enemas. It would be a miracle for one who respects neither life nor

property to respect the honor of women. Any Indian woman, married or

single, may be the object of the señor’s vicious desires. Violation and

rape mean little when one realizes that it is necessary to take the

Indian women by main force. And despite all this the Indian never speaks

to the landlord without kneeling and kissing his hand. It cannot be said

that the lords of the land act in this way through ignorance or lack of

culture. The sons of some hacienda owners go to Europe in childhood to

be educated in France or England, returning to Peru with all the outward

aspects of civilized people. But once ensconced in their haciendas, they

lose the European varnish and proceed with more inhumanity than their

fathers. When the son dons his sombrero, poncho, and spurs, the beast

reappears. To sum up: the haciendas are kingdoms in the heart of the

republic; the hacienda owners rule as autocrats in the midst of

democracy.

IV

To justify governmental negligence and the inhumanity of the despoilers

some pessimists of the Le Bon stamp a degrading stigma on the forehead

of the Indian; they accuse him of being refractory to civilization.

Anyone could imagine that if splendid schools could be built in all our

towns, with competent well paid teachers buzzing around in them, that

the rooms would be plenty empty because the children, obeying the orders

of their parents, would not hasten to receive education? Could one

imagine, moreover, that the natives would fail to follow the fine moral

example of the ruling class and crucify without a scruple all who preach

elevated and generous ideas. The Indian received what they gave him —

fanaticism and liquor.

Now let us see what is understood by civilization. Over industry and

art, over science and learning, morality gleams like a shining light on

the apex of a great pyramid. Not theological morality based on

punishment after death, but humane morality which seeks no sanction far

removed from the world. The essence of morality, for individuals as well

as for societies, consists in transforming the struggle of man against

man into a mutual accord for living. Where there is no justice, pity, or

benevolence, there is no civilization; where the struggle for life is

made the law of society, barbarism reigns. What does it avail to acquire

the wisdom of an Aristotle if one’s heart is that of a tiger? What is

there worthwhile in having the talent of a Michelangelo if one has the

soul of a pig? It is better to go through the world distilling the honey

of goodness than shedding the light of art and science. The societies

that deserve to be called highly civilized are those in which the

practice of the good has become an habitual obligation and the

beneficent act instinctive. Have they any right to consider the Indian

incapable of civilization?

The political and social organization of the ancient Inca Empire

astonishes revolutionary reformers today. True, Atahualpa did not know

his Pater Noster, nor had Calcuchima pondered the mystery of the

Trinity. But the cult of the Sun was perhaps less absurd than the

Catholic religion, and the high priest of Pachacamac scarcely exceeded

Padre Valverde in ferocity. If the subject of Huayna Capac accepted

civilization we see no reason why the Indian of the republic is inferior

to the native encountered by the conquerors; but moral depression

because of political servitude is not the same as an absolute incapacity

by organic constitution to achieve civilization. In any case, upon whom

should the blame fall?

The facts give the lie to the pessimists. Wherever the Indian is

educated in schools or simply by contact with civilized persons, he

takes on the same level of morality and culture as the descendant of the

Spaniard. [10] We constantly meet yellow men who dress, eat, live, and

think like the suave gentlemen of Lima. We see Indians in legislatures,

municipal governments, magistracies, universities, and scientific bodies

who seem no more venal nor more ignorant than those of other races. It

is impossible, in our national politics, to trace the lines of

responsibility in totum revolutis [sic] so as to say what evil is caused

by mestizos, mulattoes, and whites. There is such promiscuity of blood

and color, each individual represents so many licit or illicit mixtures,

that most Peruvians would be puzzled to figure out the dose of black and

yellow they carry in their veins. [11] No one deserves the qualification

of pure white, even though he may have blue eyes and blond hair. We need

only recall that out president who had the broadest viewpoint belonged

to the native race and was called Santa Cruz. [12] There were a hundred

more, valiant to the stage of heroism like Cahuide or loyal even to

martyrdom like Olaya. [13]

Novicow is right in saying that the supposed inferiority of Yellows and

Blacks is a chimera of diseased minds. Actually, there is no cultural

activity which cannot be performed by some black or some yellow man,

just as the most infamous act may be committed by some white. During the

invasion of China in 1900 the yellow men of Japan gave lessons in

humanity to the whites of Russia and Germany. We do not recall whether

the Blacks of Africa ever gave such lessons to the Boers of the

Transvaal and the English of the Cape; but we do know that the

Anglo-Saxon Kitchener showed himself as ferocious in the Sudan as

Behanzin in Dahomey. If, instead of comparing white-skinned masses with

dark-skinned masses, we compare one individual with another, we see that

savages and redskins at heart abound in the midst of white civilization.

Suppose we name as flowers of the race, or representative men, the King

of England and the Emperor of Germany. Do Edward VII and William II

deserve to be compared with the Indian Benito Juárez and the Black

Booker Washington? Those who lived in taverns, barracks, and brothels

before occupying a throne, or from the summit of power ordered the

pitiless massacre of children, women, and old people may be white in

skin but hide blackness in their souls.

Does the lowliness of the native race result merely from ignorance?

Certainly national ignorance is fabulous when it is recalled that in

many towns of the interior not a single man is found able to read or

write, that during the War of the Pacific the Indians believed the

conflict of the two nations was a civil war between General Chile and

General Peru, and that not long ago representatives of Chucuito went to

Tacna imagining that there they would encounter the president of the

republic.

Some pedagogues (rivaling the sellers of panaceas) imagine that if a man

knows the tributaries of the Amazon and the median temperature in

Berlin, half the road to the solution of all social problems has been

traversed. If, by some superhuman phenomenon, our national illiterates

should arise some dawn not only knowing how to read and write but with

university diplomas, the problem of the Indian would not be solved. A

proletariat of bachelors and doctors would merely replace that of the

ignorant. [Even] in the most civilized nations physicians without

patients, lawyers without clients, engineers with nothing to build,

writers without a reading public, artists without buyers, and teachers

without students abound, making up a numberless army of shining

intelligences without bread for their stomachs. Where the coastal

haciendas run to four or five fanegas and the estancias of the sierra

measure thirty or even fifty [square] leagues, the nation must be

divided into lords and serfs.

Education does indeed usually change an impulsive brute into a

reasonable and magnanimous being, teaching him and lighting for him the

path he should follow in order not to get lost at the crossroads of

life. But to see a path is not the same as to follow it to the end;

firmness of will and toughness of feet are also necessary. A proud

rebellious spirit is also needed, not the submission and deference of

the soldier and monk. Education may keep man in [a state of] meanness

and servitude — the eunuchs and grammarians of Byzantium were educated.

It is the right of every rational being to occupy on the earth the

decent place due him instead of accepting that which is assigned, to ask

for and get his daily bread, to demand a roof and piece of land.

Nothing changes the psychology of man more quickly or more fundamentally

than property. Upon escaping the servitude of hunger he grows a hundred

palms. By merely becoming the owner of something the individual rises

several steps on the social ladder, because classes are essentially

groups based upon the amount of wealth. Quite the opposite of a balloon

— the more he weighs the more he rises. To one who says the school,

reply the school and bread.

The problem of the Indian is economic and social more than educational.

How is it to be resolved? Not long ago a German conceived the idea of

restoring the Inca Empire. He learned Quechua, made himself known among

the Indians of Cuzco, began to gain supporters and might, perhaps, have

attempted an uprising if death had not surprised him when returning from

a voyage to Europe. But is there any place for such a restoration today?

If it were attempted and carried out the result would be a petty

imitation of past greatness.

The situation of the native can improve in two ways. Either the heart of

the oppressors relents to the extent or recognizing the rights of the

oppressed, or the spirit of the oppressed acquires sufficient vigor to

chasten their oppressors. If the Indian were to spend for rifles and

bullets what he wastes on alcohol and fiestas, or if he were to conceal

a weapon in the corner of his hut or on the hollow of a rock, he might

change his situation, making his property and life respected. To

violence he might then reply with violence, punishing the patron who

steals his wool, the soldier who levies in the name of the government,

and the bandit who robs his cattle and beasts of burden.

To the Indian one should not preach humility and resignation but pride

and rebellion. What has he gained by three or four hundred years of

conformity and patience? The less he is subject to authority the more

injury he escapes. It is a revealing fact that there is more well being

in the regions most remote from the big haciendas and that the towns

least often visited by the authorities enjoy greater peace and order.

To sum up, the Indian will be redeemed by his own efforts, not the

humanization of his oppressors. Every white, more or less, is a Pizarro,

a Valverde, or an Areche.

1904, 1924

[1] Auguste Comte (1798 – 1857) was a French philosopher who developed a

new social science, what he called positive science, and what he

eventually labeled sociology. He is thus, the father of sociology.

During González Prada’s time, many sociologists were Comtian one way or

another. His two foundational sociological works were Cours de

philosophie positive (1830–1842) and Système de politique positive ou

Traité de sociologie (1851–1854) [TW].

[2] Gustave Le Bon (1841–1931) was a French psychologist and sociologist

whose writings were well known for the explosive race theory they

contained. Essential to his thought were analysis of national features

that oftentimes degenerated into racial and even racist propositions.

Among his popular books can be found Psychologie des foules (1895)

translated into English as The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind (1897)

[TW].

[3] Emile Durkheim (1858–1917) was a French sociologist roughly

contemporary to González Prada. Durkheim was interested in behavior as

exterior to the individual or as the result of individual consciousness,

his favored view later in life. Like González Prada, he viewed morality

as integral to social organization [TW].

[4] González Prada signals a problem with calling people of Latin

American heritage “Latins” or “Latinos,” Latin being the language of the

Ancient Roman Empire and the people that were descended from it. Since

people of indigenous origin such as the Inca Atahualpa were never a part

of the Roman Empire nor were they even aware of Europe, calling them

“Latinos” is assigning them to a category to which they cannot possibly

belong [TW].

[5] Santo Domingo is now called the Dominican Republic [TW].

[6] Ludwig Gumplowicz (1838–1909) another of the creators of sociology.

Being a Jewish man from KrakĂłw (then an independent republic, later

Poland) he became aware of ethnic strife between Germanic and Slavic

peoples and of course the treatment that Jews received [TW].

[7] The use of such explicit racial terminology can be shocking to the

modern ear. Yet it was quite common during González Prada’s time,

appearing in other important contemporary essayists such as José Martí

and Eugenio María de Hostos. The paradox consists in González Prada

using racial terminology to attack race theory. This seems clear to us

today, but at that time (before civil rights and the advances of the

theories of heterogeneity, multiculturalism and diversity), it was hard

to see the colonialist forest for all the racist trees. Getting beyond

the language problem, one can see that González Prada continues a line

of argument first established by the early seventeenth-century

chronicler Guamán Poma de Ayala who tells us that priests and mayordomos

(stewards) “and their companions all have mistresses”, the result, of

course, being that “they have crowds of little mestizo sons and

daughters” (Felipe Guaman Poma de Ayala, The First New Chronicle and

Good Government, trans. & ed. David Frye (Indianapolis: Hackett

Publishing, 2006, pp. 150, 185). Like Guaman Poma before him and José

Carlos Mariátegui after him, González Prada seems to prefer pure-blooded

indigenous peoples over mestizos in his plans for society [TW].

[8] The Sol or “Sun” was based on the Incan deity, “Inti.” Times change

and the Sol in González Prada’s time and in our time is the unit of

currency in Peru. The paradox in this is that what was once a spiritual

entity is now a material count [TW].

[9] The mita was a form of tax labor in the Andes during the period

before the arrival of the Spanish. After the conquest it became simply

forced labor and in time grew into an institution called debt peonage

[TW].

[10] González Prada does not refer here to the elevated morality of the

inhabitants of the Tahuantinsuyo state. He is simply referring to the

degraded condition in which the decedents of the Inca’s subjects

continued to live [TW].

[11] “licit or illicit mixtures,” meaning offspring resulting from

marriage or from concubinage, from marriage or rape [TW].

[12] Andrés de Santa Cruz (1792–1865), the Bolivian president between

1829 and 1836, had the foresight that in a political union Peru and

Bolivia would be stronger politically. Thus, he formed and presided over

the ConfederaciĂłn Peruano-Boliviana during the years 1836 and 1839.

Unfortunately, Chile opposed this union, as did many Creoles from Lima,

setting the stage for its failure. Prophetically, down the road when

Chile declared war on Bolivia and Peru in 1879, these twin nations would

have been better prepared to wage war on the British-supplied Chile and

would not have both been destroyed economically and carved up

geographically [TW].

[13] José Olaya was a martyr in the Peruvian war for independence. A

fisherman from Chorrillos, he swam with messages from there to Lima. He

was captured and executed in the Plaza de Armas in the capital [TW].