💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › maia-ramnath-heart-of-darkness.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 12:48:53. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Heart of Darkness
Author: Maia Ramnath
Date: March 2004
Language: en
Topics: story, racism
Source: Retrieved on 4th March 2021 from https://users.resist.ca/~maio/essays/heartofdarkness.html

Maia Ramnath

Heart of Darkness

“If you could just fill out this form, the doctor will call you when

she’s ready for you.”

“OK.”

It’s been years since she visited the gynecologist. She avoids medical

attention at all costs, in a reverse-hypochondriac denial of her right

to sickness. But she’s come now in honor of starting a new relationship,

out of respect for someone else’s body; in the interests of full

disclosure-- of the truth, about her body and her health.

The grad student insurance plan makes it cheap and easy to drop by the

student health center, gives her access to dentists and eyeglasses and

emergency treatment if she needs it. At the same time, it’s grad school

that’s tainted healthcare for her forever. After all, once you’ve read

Foucault, you can never go back to the doctor again. She feels the net

of surveillance; it grids her skin like a crossword puzzle, cinching

close, drawing and quartering. Metal probes winkle out secrets, decode

her heartbeat, peep through keyholes into her secret dark places. Then,

forming conclusions from this ransacked knowledge, they will pass

judgments and prescribe normalizing mechanisms for her own good.

Nor do they stop with the body. Her pen freezes over the column of blank

lines. Why should she tell them if she drinks, or smokes, or how many

times per week she has sex, whether she prefers to have it with boys or

girls, or whether she has ever in her life been diagnosed with

depression or bipolarity or an eating disorder? To what kind of further

scrutiny or intervention will her answers submit her? Maybe some day

they’ll have blood tests and brain-chemistry read-outs for all these

things, instant revelations of her personal history and phylogeny. For

now, she can keep safe her self-knowledge. She can lie.

Then comes the question that always stymies her most of all.

“Race/ethnicity: check all that apply.” They didn’t used to let you do

that. The boxes have changed over the years; you get far more detailed

options now. She usually just checks “Other.” It’s the easiest thing.

The good part about that is that from the time she filled out her first

form in pre-school, she’s had no choice but to think outside the box,

which can’t but be healthy, right? This time she checks “East Indian or

Pakistani” and “European(Anglo, Nordic)” and surrenders the clipboard to

wait until they call her name.

She imagines the British colonial administrators with their census books

and taxonomies, their cameras and calipers, fixing and filing the

natives of South Asia under infinitely differentiated race headings. The

martial, the effeminate, the subhuman. How would they have marked her?

Would they have been angry when they learned her secret? She might have

been allowed to be an ayah or a train conductor.

Her father once asked her if anyone had ever made her feel bad about

being “mixed”. She said no, she’d always felt special. So why does it

matter, the need for connection, belonging, for people “like me”? Why

does it ache? Especially since she doesn’t want in to either box. Her

externality gives her the perfect excuse to deviate from the strictures

of feminine behavior, class or caste expectations. Thus within both

sides of a proud and conservative extended family, she’s got an

open-ended license for eccentricity. She’s already disqualified to a

certain degree from standards of normalcy. She trusts the doctors will

agree.

“Ms. Raym... Ramm...Ramnath? You can come on in to room two.”

A friend of hers, a philosopher, has been doing work on identity and

identification, and the construction of race. The concept of phylogeny,

says the philosopher, as used within Freudian discourse, relates to the

necessity of fencing off permissible sexual behavior: too close and it’s

family, which is taboo. Too distant and it’s beyond the pale, outside of

us and into the realm of them, which is also taboo. Family lore has it

that her mother’s grandfather Obert Nordgaard, upon meeting her mother’s

fiancé Suresh, remarked with approval and wonder, “Well, that’s a Norse

of a different color. He’s all right.” The philosopher is also exploring

the implication that people’s perceptions determine what you are: that

is, that they assign you a category and treat you accordingly, which

inevitably shapes your self-concept, your experience, your way of being

in the world. So you come to be what you look like, or at least you’re

supposed to. It’s easy, so easy to acquiesce; to simply behave in the

way that corresponds to who or what people think you are. She passes.

People read her as white: does that make her white? After all, the

structural mechanisms of racial inequity in the United States do not

impact her negatively. She doesn’t need to worry about them. And yet to

take this access for granted, to blithely join the in-group because she

can, feels morally wrong.

“Could you roll up your sleeve a little more? That’s it. Just breathe

normally.”

Finally, the philosopher is elaborating the themes of guilt and shame in

relation to racial identity, and to dealing with racial oppression. I

don’t have white guilt, she thinks. I have survivor’s guilt. She passes.

She’s healthy and well-educated, telltale signs of a middle-class

upbringing. So if she checks this box, no one will ask her any

questions: not law enforcement, not bigots, not office staff. Her secret

is safe; the deception holds. But in keeping it, does she betray her

conscience? And in accordance with conscience, where must her political

solidarity go? It’s in the search for political community that the

cognitive dissonance of her race affiliation most becomes an issue.

In general she’s tended to pursue her activism among white radicals.

It’s easy. They accept her. But there are differences in emphasis and

prioritizing of issues within these circles that cause her increasing

discomfort. For one thing, there’s a tendency to push dogmas of

“radicalism,” based on contextually specific notions of ideological

purity, that if universally applied, would either discredit or misread

much of the language and strategy used by movements in the global south

and among politically radical communities of color-- communities for

whom capitalism cannot be separated from colonialism, and for whom the

term “nationalism,” though inherently problematic, has a historical

usage linked to liberatory struggle against both. Not least of all,

there’s the assumption that radicalism is expressed through particular

ways of dressing, speaking, acting, eating, thinking and music-making

which are typical of particular white countercultures. These too can

colonize.

On the other hand, among activists of color, to whom such discussions

make sense, her near-universally ascribed identity, along with her

experience of class and skin privilege, often make her presence a

strain. If she tries to act in ways that counter mainstream normativity,

i.e. white cultural hegemony, she may be taken for just another

orientalist commodity fetishizer. It’s happened before. South Asian eyes

range from hostility, to suspicion, to curiosity, to indifference.

Whichever of these it is, she’s not assumed to be part of the “we”. It’s

in white-majority spaces that the inclusive assumption is made, and

there she feels like a dissembler, telling half-truths. You think I’m

like you, but I’m not like you. She’s an impostor. A secret agent. She

can go deep undercover and listen to white people say ignorant things

about brown people.

“Blood pressure looks good. Pulse...yes, very good.”

“Achcha,” her not unchauvinistic uncle Vishwanath once pronounced, upon

seeing his brother’s chichi children for the first time. “They’ll have

Indian intellects and American health. A desirable combination.”

(“Thanks. A lot,” said her mom.)

After the nurse has dispensed with the preliminaries and she’s stripped

down to the paper robe, the gynecologist knocks discreetly. As the

doctor adjusts her splayed position on the table and begins the exam,

she makes pleasant conversation.

“I see you’re on the grad student health plan. What’s your field?”

“History.”

“Good for you. Any particular area or period you specialize in?”

“Yes. Colonialism and radical resistance movements in general. Modern

South Asia and the British Empire in particular.”

“Fascinating stuff,” the doctor says with animation. “I’ve read quite a

few books about the Raj. I’m sure this is kind of silly for your level

of knowledge, but PBS is going to be showing The Far Pavilions next

week, in case you want to try and catch it.”

“I’ll definitely look for it.”

She and her sister love lampooning colonial cinema. An actor, the sister

once went to a casting call that specified half-desi/half-white,

attractive female, mid-20s, but they told her she didn’t look ethnic

enough. “This is what it looks like,” she said, storming out. Maybe she

should have worn a bindi, and more eyeliner; isn’t that how they usually

do it in the movies?

“Right now I’m reading Heart of Darkness,” says the doctor. “Have you

read it?”

“Yes, I have.”

“Of course that’s Africa, not India, but...”

“But it applies.”

“It’s blowing my mind. Here, you’re going to feel some pressure for a

minute or two. Is this OK?”

She takes a deep (yogic) breath and nods.

“Relax your muscles a little bit. Everybody wants to tense up right

here. Good. Anyway, I was just reading that part where they’re going up

the river in the boat, and the tribesmen are shooting arrows from the

riverbank. You know the part I mean?”

“Yes, I remember that.” The overhanging jungle, the hot shadows, the

claustrophobia of the sluggish stream. The growing apprehension as one

moves further into the unknown interior of the dark continent. Into the

space of the speculum the doctor inserts a swab. Mistah Kurtz, you in

there? She wants to laugh out loud. If she tried to write this down, the

bluntness of the symbolism would sound crudely inept.

Meanwhile the doctor goes about her business with gentle efficiency.

“Anyway, I just can’t help but be struck by the sheer arrogance of it

all. I mean, the ignorance of the colonizers.” The doctor glances at her

as if prompting further discourse. As if maybe she’ll say something

erudite, perhaps suggest some sources for further reading. She only

grunts assent. There’s metal in her vagina.

“OK, now relax, you’re tensing up again. This is going to feel cold.”

Here comes the information regime, opening her to categorization and

control. Here comes the rational digital medical eye. Here comes the

west up the dark river, creating her identity through its perception.

But it’s a false ID; she’s itchy in the accoutrements of her skin. The

doctor eases out the lubricated instruments and rubber fingers and she

closes. She hears or imagines she hears that distinctive liquid glister

of when you stir macaroni and cheese.

“You can go ahead and get dressed. I’ll be back in a minute.”

She pulls on her jeans and sweatshirt: western, unisex.

Surface and depth: what’s real, what’s true? What did the doctor learn

inside in the dark? Inside, race is irrelevant, with no biological basis

as a valid category. Blood tests and pap smears reveal nothing. Outside,

it’s so much: a social construct by which arbitrary physical markers are

selected in order to assign people to roles in an inequitable system,

which process is then elaborately cloaked in the mystic justifications

of god, state and empire.

“Are you dressed?”

“Yeah, come on in.”

What’s behind the mask, beneath the clothes? It doesn’t matter. Race

politics aren’t about essentialized identity, whether imposed as a

source of oppression or claimed as a source of strength. Race politics

are about power dynamics, and one’s functional role within them. About

structures of privilege and control, and whether one’s actions

perpetuate these structures or break them down-- whoever, whatever,

wherever you are.

After a quick rundown of her options for the latest birth control

products, she is allowed to go. Examination inconclusive. Her official

classification is Other. She’s a free alien. Knowledge cannot cage her.

Truth escapes her.