💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › aragorn-review-locked-up.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 07:33:29. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Review: Locked Up by Alfredo M. Bonanno
Author: Aragorn!
Date: 2009
Language: en
Topics: prison, review, Alfredo M. Bonanno, AJODA, AJODA #67
Source: AJODA #67

Aragorn!

Review: Locked Up by Alfredo M. Bonanno

Elephant Editions/Quiver

PO Box 993

Santa Cruz, Ca 95061

60 pages

This new pamphlet by Elephant Editions is a transcript of a presentation

by Alfredo Bonanno on the distinction between prison abolition and the

destruction of all prisons. It is a particular pleasure to read not only

because of how personal the subject matter is to Bonanno, but because

the distinction itself raises interesting questions about future

solidarity and coordination with other so-called radical groups.

At the heart of the distinction is the idea that even the idea of prison

abolition (which in this country is seen as the height of radicalism

within the emaciated prison reform movement), is fully capable of being

integrated by a progressive prison reform movement into a new way for

the State to manage prisoners (perhaps without the cost but with the

same level of control). The central contention for Bonanno is that

abolition is in practice impossible because the social context of

capitalism and the state is such that prison is a requirement for the

existing social order.

“The destruction of prison, on the other hand, clearly linked to the

revolutionary concept of destruction of the State, exists within a

process of struggle”.

This kind of distinction is seemingly impossible in North America, where

nearly anyone who desires the end of the existing order appears to be

happy working with anyone who will frown in the general direction of

authority. Bonanno’s distinction implies that anarchists can set the bar

much higher, can challenge themselves on the actual meaning of their

rhetoric, and can use that challenge to refine exactly what order of

operation our direct action should take.