💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › john-filiss-technocracy.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 11:16:00. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Technocracy Author: John Filiss Language: en Topics: primitivist, technology Source: Retrieved on 20 January 2011 from http://www.primitivism.com/technocracy.htm
The Sibyl of Cumae, whose famous Sibylline Leaves perished in a fire in
ancient Rome, was said to have gained her powers from Apollo. The
sun-god offered to grant the Sibyl any boon if she would spend the night
with him. She accepted his offer, asking him for as many years of life
as grains of sand she could squeeze within her hand. Apollo granted
this, and the Sibyl, overjoyed at realizing her wish, refused his
advances. Thereupon her wish became a curse; an extended life, but not
extended youth. Over many, many years, her aged form shriveled up so
small that it could fit into a jar. Needing neither food nor drink, as
she could neither die of hunger nor thirst, the jar was hung from a
tree. Occasionally she would spout new oracles while children would
watch her jar and tease, “Sibyl, Sibyl, what do you wish for?” In a
faint whisper, she would reply, “I wish to die.”
The story of the Sibyl of Cumae could well be a parable on modern
medicine, with its respirators and life-support equipment. More broadly,
it hints at the nature of technology itself, its reality vis-à-vis its
promise. If we were to travel back in time a thousand years, and tell
the first person we met of the marvels of our age — of cars and
airplanes, of telephones and computers, of fruits in winter and ice in
summer — our listener would doubtless imagine a world where magic
reigned, a world where humans had become demigods.
Yet few of us who live in the present find our era magical, rather the
opposite. Likewise, most of us don’t find modern society to be
particularly empowering or enriching so much as draining and devoid of
enchantment.
The most affecting moment for me in cinema is the beginning of George
Lucas’s dystopic nightmare THX-1138. The film opens with scenes from the
Buck Roger’s series of the ‘30s, as a narrator excitedly intones, “Buck
Rogers in the 25^(th) century!” And then, the screen goes blank as the
music changes, becoming bleak and ominous. The world of ray-guns and
jet-packs is left behind and we, the viewers, know, without anything
being shown us, the unreality of such innocent imaginings in the face of
the horrors the future might hold.
The film itself is perhaps the finest vision of a technocracy yet
produced. The specifics — society moved underground; robot cops and
drone-like, human workers sustained by behavioral drugs; the complete
erasure of the individual, with even names replaced by numbers; the
total conquest of nature by an arid, lifeless landscape of the
artificial — might vary from what we expect (in fact, almost certainly
does vary from what our bleak future portends), but the concept of a
society almost completely shaped by the demands of technology holds.
The concept of technocracy is ill-understood, even by many individuals
who are knowledgeable in the societal effects of technology. Much of the
literature on technology in relation to human freedom concerns itself
with the powers of the state; whether technology has the power to
emancipate the individual from governmental coercion; or conversely,
whether technology augments state power. Salient examples can be
elicited for either side; say, encryption software for the former, spy
satellites for the latter. The topic is fascinating, but limited.
Technology touches our lives in far more ways than can check or be
checked by the state. It affects our work, our culture, our social
relations, even our desires. Recognizing technology’s breadth is a
prerequisite to reaching any conclusions on its ultimate effects.
Technocracy is defined as “the management of society by technical
experts” (Webster’s 1971). More fundamentally, it is a society which
makes sustaining and, to some extent, advancing a given level of
technical achievement an issue of central importance. It should be noted
that, within a century, it is quite likely that “technical experts” may
mean artificial intelligence systems.
All civilizations have been, to some extent, technocracies. If our
civilization surpasses all others in terms of technical proficiency, it
still affords only the barest glimpse of what may lie ahead.
Science-fiction author Vernor Vinge coined the term “singularity” to
describe the future point at which technological development would
accelerate so rapidly that nothing beyond that point could be reliably
predicted. And the innovation which will give the primary impetus to a
post-singularity future — nanotechnology — is only a few decades away
from full development.