💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › errico-malatesta-towards-anarchism.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 09:44:42. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Towards Anarchism Author: Errico Malatesta Date: December 9th, 1899 Language: en Topics: practice Source: Retrieved on March 4th, 2009 from http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_archives/malatesta/towardsanarchy.html Notes: First appeared in English in the Depression era periodical MAN! This little essay was highly regarded by the revolutionary anarchist prisoner Carl Harp (1949–1981) who suggested reprinting it in this form. First printing, 1982 by: Black Cat Press, P.O. Box 11261, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
It is a general opinion that we, because we call ourselves
revolutionists, expect Anarchism to come with one stroke — as the
immediate result of an insurrection which violently attacks all that
which exists and which replaces all with institutions that are really
new. And to tell the truth this idea is not lacking among some comrades
who also conceive the revolution in such a manner.
This prejudice explains why so many honest opponents believe Anarchism a
thing impossible; and it also explains why some comrades, disgusted with
the present moral condition of the people and seeing that Anarchism
cannot come about soon, waver between an extreme dogmatism which blinds
them to the realities of life and an opportunism which practically makes
them forget that they are Anarchists and that for Anarchism they should
struggle.
Of course the triumph of Anarchism cannot be the consequence of a
miracle; it cannot come about in contradiction to the laws of
development (an axiom of evolution that nothing occurs without
sufficient cause), and nothing can be accomplished without adequate
means.
If we should want to substitute one government for another, that is,
impose our desires upon others, it would only be necessary to combine
the material forces needed to resist the actual oppressors and put
ourselves in their place.
But we do not want this; we want Anarchism which is a society based on
free and voluntary accord — a society in which no one can force his
wishes on another and in which everyone can do as he pleases and
together all will voluntarily contribute to the well-being of the
community. But because of this Anarchism will not have definitively and
universally triumphed until all men will not only not want to be
commanded but will not want to command; nor will Anarchism have
succeeded unless they will have understood the advantage of solidarity
and know how to organise a plan of social life wherein there will no
longer be traces of violence and imposition. And as the conscience,
determination, and capacity of men continuously develop and find means
of expression in the gradual modification of the new environment and in
the realisation of the desires in proportion to their being formed and
becoming imperious, so it is with Anarchism; Anarchism cannot come but
little by little slowly, but surely, growing in intensity and extension.
Therefore, the subject is not whether we accomplish Anarchism today,
tomorrow, or within ten centuries, but that we walk towards Anarchism
today, tomorrow, and always.
Anarchism is the abolition of exploitation and oppression of man by man,
that is, the abolition of private property and government; Anarchism is
the destruction of misery, of superstitions, of hatred. Therefore, every
blow given to the institutions of private property and to the
government, every exaltation of the conscience of man, every disruption
of the present conditions, every lie unmasked, every part of human
activity taken away from the control of the authorities, every
augmentation of the spirit of solidarity and initiative, is a step
towards Anarchism.
The problem lies in knowing how to choose the road that really
approaches the realisation of the ideal and in not confusing the real
progress with hypocritical reforms. For with the pretext of obtaining
immediate ameliorations these false reforms tend to distract the masses
from the struggle against authority and capitalism; they serve to
paralyse their actions and make them hope that something can be attained
through the kindness of the exploiters and governments. The problem lies
in knowing how to use the little power we have — that we go on
achieving, in the most economical way, more prestige for our goal.
There is in every country a government which, with brutal force, imposes
its laws on all; it compels all to be subjected to exploitation and to
maintain, whether they like it or not, the existing institutions. It
forbids the minority groups to actuate their ideas, and prevents the
social organisations in general from modifying themselves according to,
and with, the modifications of public opinion. The normal peaceful
course of evolution is arrested by violence, and thus with violence it
is necessary to reopen that course. It is for this reason that we want a
violent revolution today; and we shall want it always — so long as man
is subject to the imposition of things contrary to his natural desires.
Take away the governmental violence and ours would have no reason to
exist.
We cannot as yet overthrow the prevailing government; perhaps tomorrow
from the ruins of the present government we cannot prevent the arising
of another similar one. But this does not hinder us, nor will it
tomorrow, from resisting whatever form of authority — refusing always to
submit to its laws whenever possible, and constantly using force to
oppose force.
Every weakening of whatever kind of authority, each accession of liberty
will be a progress towards Anarchism; always it should be conquered —
never asked for; always it should serve to give us greater strength in
the struggle; always it should make us consider the state as an enemy
with whom we should never make peace; always it should make us remember
well that the decrease of the ills produced by the government consists
in the decrease of its attributions and powers, and the resulting terms
should be determined not by those who governed but by those were
governed. By government we mean any person or group of persons in the
state, country, community, or association who has the right to make laws
and inflict them upon those who do not want them.
We cannot as yet abolish private property; we cannot regulate the means
of production which is necessary to work freely; perhaps we shall not be
able to do so in the next insurrectional movement. But this does not
prevent us now, or will it in the future, from continually opposing
capitalism or any other form of despotism. And each victory, however
small, gained by the workers against their exploiters, each decrease of
profit, every bit of wealth taken from the individual owners and put at
the disposal of all, shall be a progress — a forward step towards
Anarchism. Always it should serve to enlarge the claims of the workers
and to intensify the struggle; always it should be accepted as a victory
over an enemy and not as a concession for which we should be thankful;
always we should remain firm in our resolution to take with force, as
soon as it will be possible, those means which the private owners,
protected by the government, have stolen from the workers.
The right of force having disappeared, the means of production being
placed under the management of whoever wants to produce, the result must
be the fruit of a peaceful evolution.
Anarchism could not be, nor would it ever be if not for these few who
want it and want it only in those things they can accomplish without the
co-operation of the non-anarchists. This does not necessarily mean that
the ideal of Anarchism will make little or no progress, for little by
little its ideas will extend to more men and more things until it will
have embraced all mankind and all life’s manifestations.
Having overthrown the government and all the existing dangerous
institutions which with force it defends, having conquered complete
freedom for all and with it the means of regulating labour without which
liberty would be a lie, and while we are struggling to arrive at this
point, we do not intend to destroy those things which we little by
little will reconstruct.
For example, there functions in the present society the service of
supplying food. This is being done badly, chaotically, with great waste
of energy and material and with capitalist interests in view; but after
all, one way or another we must eat. It would be absurd to want to
disorganise the system of producing and distributing food unless we
could substitute for it something better and more just.
There exists a postal service. We have thousands of criticisms to make,
but in the meantime we use it to send our letters, and shall continue to
use it, suffering all its faults, until we shall be able to correct or
replace it.
There are schools, but how badly they function. But because of this we
do not allow our children to remain in ignorance — refusing their
learning to read and write.
Meanwhile we wait and struggle for a time when we shall be able to
organise a system of model schools to accommodate all.
From this we can see that, to arrive at Anarchism, material force is not
the only thing to make a revolution; it is essential that the workers,
grouped according to the various branches of production, place
themselves in a position that will insure the proper functioning of
their social life — without the aid or need of capitalists or
governments.
And we see also that the Anarchist ideals are far from being in
contradiction, as the “scientific socialists” claim, to the laws of
evolution as proved by science; they are a conception which fits these
laws perfectly; they are the experimental system brought from the field
of research to that of social realisation.