💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › david-graeber-notes-on-desire.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 09:06:44. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-06-20)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Notes on Desire Author: David Graeber Date: 2012 Language: en Topics: notes, desire Source: Retrieved on 28th November 2021 from https://davidgraeber.org/articles/desire/
David Graeber: The idea that alienation is a bad thing is a modernist
problem. Most philosophical movements—and, by extension, social
movements—actually embrace alienation. You’re trying to achieve a state
of alienation. That’s the ideal if you’re a Buddhist or an early
Christian, for example; alienation is a sign that you understand
something about the reality of the world.
So perhaps what’s new with modernity is that people feel they shouldn’t
be alienated. Colin Campbell wrote a book called The Romantic Ethic and
the Spirit of Modern Consumerism [1987], in which he argued that
modernity has introduced a genuinely new form of hedonism. Hedonism is
no longer just getting the sex, drugs, and rock ’n’ roll or whatever but
it’s become a matter of selling new fantasies so that you’re always
imagining the thing you want. The object of desire is just an excuse, a
pretext, and that’s why you’re always disappointed when you get it.
Campbell’s argument makes total sense when you first read it. But in
fact, again, it’s backward. If you look at history—at, say, medieval
theories of desire—it’s utterly assumed that what you desire is—
Michelle Kuo: God.
DG: Or courtly love, yes. But whatever it ultimately is, the idea that
by seizing the object of your desire you would resolve the issue was
actually considered a symptom of melancholia. The fantasies themselves
are the realization of desire. So by that logic, what Campbell describes
is not a new idea. What’s actually new is the notion that you should be
able to resolve desire by attaining the object. Perhaps what’s new is
the fact that we think there’s something wrong with alienation, not that
we experience it. By most medieval perspectives, our entire civilization
is thus really a form of clinical depression. [laughter]
— “Another World: Michelle Kuo Talks with David Graeber” in Artforum
---
Insofar as it is useful to distinguish something called “desire” from
needs, urges, or intentions, then, it is because desire:
imaginary
recognition and, hence, an imaginative reconstruction of the self; a
process fraught with dangers of destroying that social relation, or
turning it into some kind of terrible conflict
— David Graeber, “Possibilities: Essays on Hierarchy, Rebellion, and
Desire”