💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › james-mcbarron-after-nationalism.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 11:25:25. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: After Nationalism... Author: James McBarron Date: 2005 Language: en Topics: nationalism, Ireland, Red & Black Revolution Source: Retrieved on 9th August 2021 from http://struggle.ws/wsm/rbr/rbr9/nationalism.html Notes: This article is from Red & Black Revolution (no 9, Spring 2005)
I joined Sinn FĂ©in in the mid eighties with many others on the back of
what we saw as a radical shift to the left and a commitment to build a
32 county Democartic Socialist Republic. I find myself outside that
movement now, thoroughly disillusioned with it and its shift to a left
nationalist and social democratic electoralist future.
We are many years into the Irish peace process — how many depends on
your perspective — but we can at least agree that the Good Friday
agreement of 1998 is a key point in the evolution of the process. The
current impasse centres largely on the question of accomodating Sinn
FĂ©in into the political establishment north and south. Though the IRA
was defeated and Sinn FĂ©in began the journey towards an accomodation
with imperialism and the southern state, many of the activists and
indeed many in the communities from which the republican movement drew
its most hardcore support have had a difficulty adjusting to the new
realities. This has arisen primarily because of the lies that the
leadership of that movement have fed the grassroots in order to keep
them on board.
Mostly this has consisted of pretending that the road they are now on is
something new and innovative that will lead them to the Republic. But
time has taken its toll and the British and Irish states have become
impatient of the Adams leadership’s slow softly approach and want the
open capitulation of the republican movement, an end to the IRA and the
full integration of SF into the system.
This isn’t easy either for the republicans or the unionists who have to
also abandon their stated hardline approach. (Unionism represents the
politics of the former ruling class in the north, almost exclusively
protestant and pro the union with Britain, they monopolised power after
partition and used this power to build a sectarian little state.
Unionist politicians enjoy the support of the vast majority of the
protestant working class at election time. Unionists are a majority in
the north. The unionist leadership has realised that a carve-up of power
with nationalism is their only future hope of any power). The various
crises around the process have revolved around these issues.
Of course it is inevitable that Sinn FĂ©in in its current manifestation
will go in to the system and fully endorse policing, the courts the
prison system, the civil service etc. Sinn FĂ©in have always believed in
the use of the state and the division of people into leaders and lead.
All institutions of the state will be accepted and Sinn FĂ©in will become
the new and more organised SDLP of the north. They will share in power
eventually with a pragmatic and realistic unionist leadership which will
emerge more strongly as the old guard die off or become marginalised
with time. What we will have then will probably be a government in the
north enjoying a large degree of acceptability or at least benign
indifference amongst the population. Sinn FĂ©in n in the south will
follow the well worn path to participation in administering power in the
Dail. Outside of the mainstream republican movement some few of those
embittered by their experience will hang onto the old politics and
recruit, drill, train, fundraise and prepare for another round at some
day in the future.
And us, the working class, well we will again be faced with the same old
problems of exploitation, oppression, inequality and constant struggle
that we always are. But we will have to fight a movement that once
proclaimed itself revolutionary and keen to abolish capitalism north and
south but that is now bought and part of the structure. How many good
sincere activists will be destroyed, buried in the bullshit of
paliamentary politics, trying to get the odd pot-hole filled whilst the
whole show goes on as before and past dreams of social revolution slowly
ebb away to “a favour here or there” and a few dry empty commemorations
of past deeds.
If all the peace process had done was end the armed struggle that would
have been great, but it has done far more than that. It has strenghtened
the states north and south. The struggle for social justice continues.
Today fighting the Water Tax in Belfast, on a picket line in Dublin,
pushing for abortion rights in Cork, fighting racism in Galway,
demanding housing in Derry. All these struggles and many more push our
class interests forward. Unifying them in ideas of self reliance, mass
democracy and direct action, libertarian ideas, anarchist ideas — that
is where the struggle is at. Republicanism will rise again, taking many
good young activists to the grave, prison and despair unless we
popularise truly revolutionary ideas to act as a positive pole of
attraction.