💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › federazione-dei-comunisti-anarchici-mare-nostrum.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 09:55:48. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Mare Nostrum Author: Federazione dei Comunisti Anarchici Date: 11th September 2006 Language: en Topics: Italy, militarism, Middle East Source: Retrieved on 29th October 2021 from http://www.anarkismo.net/article/3730
The Italian army has taken up position on Lebanon’s southern border. The
fleet will be patrolling the coasts, now that Israel has lifted its
naval blockade. As far as the rebuilding of Lebanon is concerned, Italy
has good hopes of doing business with Beirut’s powerful construction
companies.
Hezbollah is contented. Israel says thank you. Syria, for the first time
in ages, is spoken to firmly, but this time without threats. Italy’s
head of government receives the Iranian delegation on the “nuclear
question”. France, Spain and Turkey follow behind and join up. On the
Mediterranean front of the great conflict there is now the chance for a
break in the war that nobody wants to win because it never ends.
In fact, after half destroying Lebanon, Israel goes on destroying and
spreading terror in Gaza and the West Bank, but announces that it is
looking forward to the Palestinian factions forming a government of
national unity that could be the precursor to a ceasefire. A ceasefire
which would bear the guarantee of the very clever Nasrallah, who is busy
trying to reconcile the image of national liberator with that one regret
(for the consumption of all those who reprimanded him for having caused
the disaster).
So how long will it last? Maybe not very long — depending on the other
fronts. It may also depend on a couple of questions (questions which lie
behind the ongoing war) that have an audience on opposing sides and that
are probably at the root of Italy’s eagerness to be involved, in the
name of the EU.
First, the energy question. Within a few years, 3 pipelines bringing oil
from Russian and the Caspian Sea will reach the Eastern Mediterranean
(Turkey and Greece). “Peaceful” access to those terminals requires
potential purchasers to agree with the local geopolitics. Israel has
insured itself against local competition by destroying Lebanon, but
Europe too, thirsty for oil and gas, is in the game. Italy’s in Lebanon
is a message to Algeria, which has made agreements with Gazprom
(Russia); it is a message to Syria, which will be home to a Russian
naval base in Tartus; it is also a message to Iran, which is seeking
outlets to the west for its gas and for oil. European access to these
energy resources and terminals, providing support for the USA but with a
change of tactics on the Mediterranean front, military intervention in
Lebanon along the lines of Bosnia and Kosovo, containing Russian
expansionism: these are the goals of Italy’s renewed enthusiasm for a
central role within the dynamics of imperialism — one step up in the
system of dependencies between world and regional powers. But only by
hoping that Israel renounces the next slaughter.
Then there is the security question. If there is one thing in the
European Mediterranean and in the Near East that, propaganda and
appearances aside, everyone agrees on — States, real or supposed
national liberation movements, various military elites — it is the fear
of Al-Qaeda (itself or by proxy) taking root in the Mediterranean with a
consequent contamination Ă la Iraq. Europe fears it, Israel fears it,
the regimes in power in Arab countries (all traitors in the eyes of
Al-Qaeda) fear it, and above all it is feared by Hamas, who realise that
they cannot prolong the crisis without running the risk of contamination
and losing control of its own supporters. It is probably not a good idea
even for Iran, which is seeking to impose its own “pax” as a regional
power.
But Italy has not developed an alternative to, nor has it districated
itself from, US unilateralism. It has not given the UN any sort of
boost, neither does it go any further to promote the much talked-about
multilateralism. It is just that the never-ending trouble on the Afghan
and Iraqi fronts demanded a break in hostilities on the Middle-Eastern
front. That the showdown between the USA and Iran could not count on an
adequate and approving audience. Hence this new opportunity for Italy’s
general.
The mission in Lebanon will cost €160 million every six months, to be
added to the €1,396 million for Kosovo, €155 million for Bosnia, €1,612
million for Afghanistan and €1,611 million for Iraq. Italy’s economic
recovery is going towards financing military expenditure rather than
social expenditure. But what does the centre-left government care, given
the “strategic” financial gains to be made? There is always Article 11
of the Constitution, which can be waved in an attempt to save face and
consciences.[1]
The anti-war movement which blossomed throughout Italy between 2003 and
2005 has become bogged down with its former leaders busy in parliament
or involved in political musical chairs between the various factions in
the ruling coalition. Many are fooling themselves into believing that
somehow our presence in Lebanon really is helping to keep the peace, not
like in Iraq. But an army is an army. It is a war machine, no matter
where it is!!
Peace in the Mediterranean cannot depend on military peace missions,
only on the re-birth of civil society and on the autonomy of the
workers’ movements in each country, together with de-militarization and
disarmament on all fronts.
We urgently need a new demonstration of committed civil, secular
solidarity. This country urgently needs a new pacifist, anti-militarist,
internationalist, feminist anti-war movement to oppose aggression and
oppression. A movement which can support local initiatives abroad in
their struggle for equal and free access to resources, to free
themselves from national and foreign oppressors, for the emancipation of
the poor and exploited classes. Because peace takes root and spreads
hand-in-hand with the freedom of thought and organization, with the
expansion of rights and policies for economic and civil equality.
[1] Article 11 of the Italian constitution states that “Italy rejects
war as an instrument of aggression against the freedom of other peoples
and as a means for the settlement of international disputes”.