💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › emma-goldman-samuel-gompers.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 09:34:12. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Title: Samuel Gompers
Author: Emma Goldman
Date: 1925
Language: en
Topics: marxism, syndicalist
Source: Retrieved on March 15th, 2009 from http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/Goldman/Writings/Essays/gompers.html
Notes: Published in The Road to Freedom (New York), Vol. 1, March 1925.

Emma Goldman

Samuel Gompers

The numerous tributes paid to the late President of the American

Federation of Labor, emphasized his great leadership. “Gompers was a

leader of men,” they said. One would have expected that the disaster

brought upon the world by leadership would have proven that to be a

leader of men is far from a virtue. Rather is it a vice for which those

who are being led are usually made to pay very heavily.

The last fifteen years are replete with examples of what the leaders of

men have done to the peoples of the world. The Lenins, Clemenceaus, the

Lloyd Georges and Wilson, have all posed as great leaders. Yet they have

brought misery, destruction and death. They have led the masses away

from the promised goal.

Pious Communists will no doubt consider it heresy to speak of Lenin in

the same breath with the other statesmen, diplomats and generals who

have led the people to slaughter and half of the world to ruin. To be

sure, Lenin was the greatest of them all. He at least had a new vision,

he had daring, he faced fire and death, which is more than can be said

for the others. Yet it remains a tragic fact that even Lenin brought

havoc to Russia. It was his leadership which emasculated the Russian

revolution and stifled the aspirations of the Russian people.

Gompers was far from being a Lenin, but in his small way his leadership

has done a great harm to the American workers. One has but to examine

into the nature of the American Federation of Labor, over which Mr.

Gompers lorded for so many years, to see the evil results of leadership.

It cannot be denied that the late President raised the organization to

some power and material improvement, but at the same time, he prevented

the growth and development of the membership towards a higher aim or

purpose. In all these years of its existence the A. F. of L. has not

gone beyond its craft interests. Neither has it grasped the social abyss

which separates labor from its masters, an abyss which can never be

bridged by the struggle for mere immediate material gains. That does not

mean, however, that I am opposed to the fight labor is waging for a

higher standard of living and saner conditions of work. But I do mean to

stress that without an ultimate goal of complete industrial and social

emancipation, labor will achieve only as much as is in keeping with the

interests of the privileged class, hence remain dependent always upon

that class.

Samuel Gompers was no fool, he knew the causes underlying the social

struggle, yet he set his face sternly against them. He was content to

create an aristocracy of labor, a trade union trust, as it were,

indifferent to the needs of the rest of the workers outside of the

organization. Above all, Gompers would have none of a liberating social

idea. The result is that after forty years of Gompers’ leadership the A.

F. of L. has really remained stationary, without feeling for, or

understanding of the changing factors surrounding it.

The workers who have developed a proletarian consciousness and fighting

spirit are not in the A. F. of L. They are in the organization of the

Industrial Workers of the World. The bitterest opponent of this heroic

band of American proletarians was Samuel Gompers. But then, Mr. Gompers

was inherently reactionary. This tendency asserted itself on more than

one occasion in his career. Most flagrantly did his reactionary leanings

come to the fore in the MacNamara case, the War and the Russian

Revolution.

The story of the MacNamara case is very little known in Europe. Yet

their story has played a significant part in the industrial warfare of

the United States, the warfare between the Steel Trust, the Merchants’

Manufacturers’ Association, and the infamous Labor baiter, the Los

Angeles Times, arrayed against the Iron Structural Union. The savage

methods of the unholy trinity expressed themselves in a system of

espionage, the employment of thugs for the purpose of slugging strikers

with violence of every form, besides the use of the entire machinery of

the American Government, which is always at the beck and call of

American capitalism. This formidable conspiracy against labor, the Iron

Structural Union, in defence of its existence fought desperately for a

period of years.

J. J. and Jim MacNamara, being among the most ardent and unflinching

members of the Union, consecrated their lives and took the most active

part in the war against the forces of American industrialism and high

finance until they were trapped by the despicable spies employed in the

organization of William J. Burns, the infamous man hunter. With the

MacNamaras were two other victims, Matthew A. Schmidt, one of the finest

types of American proletarians, and David Caplan.

Samuel Gompers, as the President of the A. F. of L. could not have been

unaware of the things these poor men were charged with. He stood by them

as long as they were considered innocent. But when the two brothers, led

by their desire to shield “the higher ups” admitted their acts, it was

Gompers who turned from them and left them to their doom. The whitewash

of the organization was more to him than his comrades, who had carried

out the work in constant danger to their own lives, while Mr. Samuel

Gompers enjoyed the safety and the glory as President of the A. F. of L.

The four men were sacrificed. Jim MacNamara and Matthew A. Schmidt sent

to life imprisonment, while J. J. MacNamara and David Caplan received

fifteen and ten years respectively. The latter two have since been

released, while the former are continuing a living death in St. Quentin

Prison, California. And Samuel Gompers was buried with the highest

honors by the class which hounded his comrades to their doom.

In the War, the late President of the A. F. of L., turned the entire

organization over to those he had ostensibly fought all his life. Some

of his friends insist that Gompers became obsessed by the War mania

because the German Social Democrats had betrayed the spirit of

Internationalism. As if two wrongs ever made a right! The fact is, that

Gompers was never able to swim against the tide. Hence he made common

cause with the war lords and delivered the membership of the A. F. of

L., to be slaughtered in the War, which is now being recognized by many

erstwhile ardent patriots, to have been a war not for democracy, but for

conquest and power. The attitude of Samuel Gompers to the Russian

Revolution, more than anything else, showed his dominant reactionary

leanings. It is claimed for him that he had the “goods” on the

Bolsheviki. Therefore he supported the blockade and intervention. That

is absurd for two reasons: First, when Gompers began his campaign

against Russia, he could not possibly have had any knowledge of the evil

doings of Bolshevism. Russia was then cut off from the rest of the

world. And no one knew exactly what was happening there. Secondly, the

blockade and intervention struck down the Russian people, at the same

time strengthening the power of the Communist State.

No, it was not his knowledge of the Bolsheviki which made Gompers go

with the slayers of Russian women and children. It was his fear for and

his hatred of, the Revolution itself. He was too steeped in the old

ideas to grasp the gigantic events that had swept over Russia, the

burning idealism of the people who had made the Revolution. He never

took the slightest pains to differentiate between the Revolution and the

machine set up to sidetrack its course. Most of us who now must stand

out against the present rulers of Russia do so because we have learned

to see the abyss between the Russian Revolution, the ideals of the

people and the crushing dictatorship now in power. Gompers never

realized that.

Well, Samuel Gompers is dead. It is to be hoped that his soul will not

be marching on in the ranks of the A. F. of L. More and more the

conditions in the United States are drawing the line rigidly between the

classes. More and more it is becoming imperative for the workers to

prepare themselves for the fundamental changes that are before them.

They will have to acquire the knowledge and the will as well as the

ability to reconstruct society along such economic and social lines that

will prevent the repetition of the tragic debacle of the Russian

Revolution. The masses everywhere will have to realize that leadership,

whether by one man or a political group, must inevitably lead to

disaster.

Not leadership, but the combined efforts of the workers and the cultural

elements in society can successfully pave the way for new forms of life

which shall guarantee freedom and well-being for all.