💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › samuel-edward-konkin-iii-hospercult.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 13:56:27. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Hospercult Author: Samuel Edward Konkin III Date: August 1, 1974 Language: en Topics: libertarianism Source: https://www.sek3.net/hospercult.html Notes: Southern Libertarian Review Volume 1 Number 3 / October, 1974 Page 4
In January 1973, Your Friendly Neighborhood Anarchocolumnist (YFNA—ed.)
tore into shreads an article written by John Hospers, Ph. D. The article
fuzzed up the archy/anarchy controversy, and it will probably be viewed
historically as the last ditch defense of minarchy through obfuscation.
As far as I know, Hospers has ceased & desisted in this area.
Let me keep the fuzz out of one realm: personalities. Go-betweens inform
me that Dr. John was offended by a lowly doctoral candidate in
theoretical chemistry blowing his professorial dissertation. Of course,
scientists are required to use rigour and logic on a day-to-day basis...
No, the good doctor need not feel miffed and was assured of no rancor.
Since his Abaco fomenting, he seems to have broadened his outlook and is
developing quite admiringly. As a person.
The critique I wrote was part of a general attack on REASON. The
magazine has improved somewhat since then, printing some tame
anarchists; and, as I said, so has Hospers. But a new phenomenon has
arisen, one which evokes guffaws as a response, hardly deserving of the
ponderous artillery of Aristotle.
I refer to Hosperscult.
YFNA has seen many “cults of personality” come and go. When he came
along in 1969, Rand was out, Branden was in decline, Leonard Read was
receding, and LeFevre and Rothbard were shining. Above all was the
intellectual giant, Ludwig von Mises.
These were individuals of achievement, men and women who stood as
examples of the efficacy of a single person—the unique one. The heresy
of “following” an individualist is damning enough—but so easily
understandable.
All of them earned this respect. By their own efforts. In the
all-too-hostile marketplace. Nobody “voted” them awards... until much
past their prime.
What then can we think of a movement which honours those of no visible
achievement? Surely libertarians, anti-Statists of all persuasions,
cannot regard vote-getting as a worthy achievement!
But, for the sake of a column, let’s suppose that we can admire it as an
accomplishment of some sort—as we might admire the Isolationist aspects
of Hitler’s or Mao’s foreign policy even while recoiling in choking fury
from their domestic. Very well. Now, let’s see, how many votes did
Hospers get?
No John C. Fremont here. Again, lest poor Doc John feel put upon, let us
throw in Fran “I Bring Much” Youngstein, who got one-third as many votes
as she got petition signatures! And let us mercifully forget the
quixotic campaigns of Messrs. Block and Greenberg, with their
ballotophelic “Outlook.” One thing we can say about libertarian
candidates in general—they sure don’t threaten us with their charisma.
That is, they are not going to turn the general public into fanatical
arm-banded followers for a coup.
There are charismatic libertarians. Dana Rohrbacher and Robert LeFevre
come quickly to mind. Is it coincidence that they are anti-“political”?
I would urge upon my fellow libertarians an end to attacks on—and thus
defense of—the professor. Let him gracefully slip away after the coming
debacle in California for the LP there, and get back to his work of
self-improvement. Perhaps his greatness lies waiting yet to blossom, and
we are distracting and stunting it by dumping on all this fertilizer
prematurely.
Perhaps the Libertarian Party could move back in tune with the Movement
by offering a joke candidate. Someone whose only claim to political
accomplishment is the acquisition of a meaningless office, and who would
campaign in a whimsical, folksy, one-of-the-rednecks manner. Like an
Electoral College graduate.
I can see it all now: “Don’t Leave MacBride at the Altar—He’s the Best
Man!”