💾 Archived View for library.inu.red › file › bob-black-left-rites.gmi captured on 2023-01-29 at 07:54:56. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Title: Left Rites Author: Bob Black Date: 1982 Language: en Topics: leftism Source: Retrieved on October 5th, 2009 from http://www.inspiracy.com/black/abolition/leftrites.html
In astronomy, “revolution” refers to a return to the same place. For the
left it seems to mean about the same. Leftism is literally reactionary.
Just as generals prepare to fight the last war, leftists incite the last
revolution. They welcome it because they know it failed. They’re
vanguardists because they’re always behind the times. Like all leaders,
leftists are least obnoxious when following their following, but in
certain crises they step to the fore to make the system work. If the
left/right metaphor has any meaning, it can only be that the left is to
the left of the same thing the right is to the right of. But what if
revolution means stepping out of line?
If there were no right, the left would have to invent it — and it often
has. (Examples: Calculated hysteria over Nazis and KKK which awards
these wimpy slugs the notoriety they need; or lowest-common-denunciation
of the Moral Majority obviating unmannerly attacks on the real sources
of moralist tyranny — the family, religion in general, and the
work-ethic espoused by leftists and Christians alike.) The right
likewise needs the left: its operational definition is always
anti-communism, variously drecked-out. Thus left and right presuppose
and recreate each other.
One bad thing about bad times is that they make opposition too easy, as
(for instance) the current economic crisis gets shoehorned into archaic
Marxist, populist or syndicalist categories. The left thereby positions
itself to fulfill its historic role as reformer of those incidental
(albeit agonizing) evils which, properly attended to, conceal the
system’s essential inequities: hierarchy, moralism, bureaucracy,
wage-labor, monogamy, government, money. (How can Marxism ever be more
than capital’s most sophisticated way of thinking about itself?)
Consider the acknowledged epicenter of the current crisis: work.
Unemployment is a bad thing. But it doesn’t follow, outside of
righto-leftist dogma, that employment is a good thing. It isn’t. The
“right to work,” arguably an appropriate slogan in 1848, is obsolete in
1982. People don’t need work. What we need is satisfaction of
subsistence requirements, on the one hand, and opportunities for
creative, convivial, educative, diverse, passionate activity on the
other. Twenty years ago the Goodman brothers guessed that 5% of the
labor then expended would meet minimum survival needs, a figure which
must be lower today; obviously entire so-called industries serve nothing
but the predatory purposes of commerce and coercion. That’s an ample
infrastructure to play with in creating a world of freedom, community
and pleasure where “production” of use-values is “consumption” of free
gratifying activity. Transforming work into play is a project for a
proletariat that refuses that condition, not for leftists left with
nothing to lead.
Pragmatism, as is obvious from a glance at its works, is a delusive
snare. Utopia is sheer common sense. The choice between “full
employment” and unemployment — the choice that left and right
collaborate to confine us to — is the choice between the Gulag and the
gutter. No wonder that after all these years a stifled and suffering
populace is weary of the democratic lie. There are less and less people
who want to work, even among those who rightly fear unemployment, and
more and more people who want to work wonders. By all means let’s
agitate for handouts, tax cuts, freebies, bread and circuses — why not
bite the hand that feeds you? the flavor is excellent — but without
illusions.
The (sur)rational kernel of truth in the mystical Marxist shell is this:
the “working class” is the legendary “revolutionary agent”: but only if,
by not working, it abolishes class. Perennial “organizers,” leftists
don’t understand that the workers have already been definitively
“organized” by, and can only be organized for — their bosses. “Activism”
is idiocy if it enriches and empowers our enemies. Leftism, that
parasite for sore l’s, dreads the outbreak of a Wilhelm Reichstag fire
which will consume its parties and unions along with the corporations
and armies and churches currently controlled by its ostensible opposite.
Nowadays you have to be odd to get even. Greylife leftism, with its
checklists of obligatory antagonisms (to this-ism, that-ism and the
other-ism: everything but leftism) is devoid of all humor and
imagination: hence it can stage only coups, not revolutions, which
change lies but not life. But the urge to create is also a destructive
urge. One more effort, leftists, if you would be revolutionaries! If
you’re not revolting against work, you’re working against revolt.